Industrial Innovation Development

Multiple Pathways and Implementation Mechanism of Digital Intelligence Empowerment in Industrial Internet Platforms from a Configurational Perspective

  • Zhu Xiaohong ,
  • Zhong Chenxin ,
  • Zhou Xinyu
Expand
  • (Department of Economics and Management, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China)

Received date: 2024-10-10

  Revised date: 2025-01-26

  Online published: 2025-11-10

Abstract

The Chinese government has endeavored to accelerate the popularization and application of new-generation information technologies, promoting the development of industrial Internet, and positioning it as a key engine for new-type industrialization and a strategic foundation for the creation of new productive forces. Industrial Internet platforms, such as AeroCloud Network and Haier COSMOPlat, have empowered enterprises with digital intelligence, helping them achieve lean management, transformation and upgrading, as well as innovative development. However, with the rapid emergence of industrial Internet platforms, how to fully leverage their digital intelligence empowerment value and explore the underlying mechanisms of its realization has become a key issue to be addressed. Existing research has shown that digital intelligence empowerment can create new business logics and value paradigms, innovate manufacturing service models, and promote intelligent manufacturing and high-quality enterprise development. However, current theoretical exploration lags behind practical applications, focusing mostly on single-factor aspects. The systematic and complex nature of platform ecosystems is overlooked, with insufficient analysis of the combined effects and synergies of multiple factors. Additionally, there is a lack of quantitative assessment and systematic elaboration of the empowerment effects.
From a configurational perspective, this study develops an integrated theoretical framework that captures the essence of the digital intelligence era and the developmental requirements of platforms. Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, the study examines 49 national “dual-cross” industrial Internet platforms. It focuses on the core question of how these platforms can achieve high digital intelligence empowerment and explores the digital intelligence empowerment of industrial Internet platforms influenced by the interplay of the platforms themselves, platform-enabling enterprises, and the operational environment. By addressing these questions, this study reveals the dynamic and complex nature of the unique driving mechanisms and realization pathways of digital intelligence empowerment. It also offers precise theoretical guidance and practical solutions for formulating strategies and optimizing operations to enhance the digital intelligence empowerment of industrial Internet platforms.
The study reaches the following conclusions: (1) The valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable resources (hereinafter referred to as “VRIN resources”) are essential for achieving the digital intelligence empowerment of industrial Internet platforms. Optimizing these resources significantly enhances the platforms' empowerment effects and drives the digital intelligence transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry. (2) The digital intelligence empowerment of industrial Internet platforms follows multiple pathways and complex mechanisms. Three key factors of“ecological synergy and linkage”, “market stabilization and collaboration” and “resource decision-driven”are critical in achieving high digital intelligence empowerment. These three factors represent significant types of high digital intelligence empowerment among industrial Internet platforms. Each mode reflects the strategic actions of different platforms to achieve high digital intelligence empowerment based on their unique ecological characteristics and strengths, collectively forming a multi-dimensional strategic framework for high digital intelligence empowerment. “Ecological looseness and imbalance” and “weak market competition” are typical types of low digital intelligence empowerment among industrial Internet platforms, exhibiting asymmetric relationships with the high empowerment patterns. (3) Under specific configurations, the elements of “platform subject-platform object-platform environment” can achieve high digital intelligence empowerment through complementary interactions and equivalent substitutions. This process follows a “diverse pathways to a common goal” approach.
This study develops a theoretical framework for the digital intelligence empowerment of industrial Internet platforms from a configurational perspective, thereby enriching the theoretical understanding of digital intelligence empowerment within the digital intelligence context. Meanwhile, this study develops an evaluation framework for assessing the digital intelligence empowerment effect of industrial Internet platforms, thereby expanding the quantitative evaluation of digital intelligence empowerment. In addition, it examines the realization of digital intelligence empowerment based on platform ecosystem theory, and extends the application of platform ecosystem theory. The study emphasizes that industrial Internet platform enterprises must strategically prioritize the cultivation of VRIN resources, focus on their development, and utilize them to enhance digital intelligence empowerment. Achieving high digital intelligence empowerment is not a one-size-fits-all process. Instead, enterprises should comprehensively analyze the characteristics of platform ecosystem elements and external environmental conditions, conduct effective strategic planning, and choose appropriate empowerment pathways.

Cite this article

Zhu Xiaohong , Zhong Chenxin , Zhou Xinyu . Multiple Pathways and Implementation Mechanism of Digital Intelligence Empowerment in Industrial Internet Platforms from a Configurational Perspective[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026 , 43(8) : 74 -84 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.D202410077W

References

[1] 孙新波,刘剑桥,张明超,等.工业互联网平台赋能参与型制造企业价值链数字重构绩效的组态分析[J]. 管理学报,2024,21(6):811-820.
[2] 陈武,陈建安,李燕萍.工业互联网平台:内涵、演化与赋能[J]. 经济管理,2022,44(5):189-208.
[3] 孙新波,张明超,王永霞.工业互联网平台赋能促进数据化商业生态系统构建机理案例研究[J]. 管理评论,2022,34(1):322-337.
[4] LABRECQUE L I, VOR D E J, MATHWICK C, et al. Consumer power:evolution in the digital age[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2013,27(4):257-269.
[5] DONG Y, YAO X, WEI Z. Research on the process of knowledge value co-creation between manufacturing enterprises and internet enterprises[J]. Knowledge Management Research&Practice, 2024,22(3):282-297.
[6] LI Z, CHEN J, LI Z. Strengthen or weaken? how industrial internet platform affects the core competitiveness of manufacturing companies[J]. Operations Management Research, 2024,17(1):220-232.
[7] 孙新波,张明超.工业互联网平台赋能智能制造生态系统构建——基于海尔卡奥斯的案例研究[J]. 经济管理,2023,45(11):5-26.
[8] LI H, YANG Z, JIN C, et al. How an industrial internet platform empowers the digital transformation of SMEs: theoretical mechanism and business model[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2023,27(1):105-120.
[9] WANG P, LUO M A. Digital twin-based big data virtual and real fusion learning reference framework supported by industrial internet towards smart manufacturing[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2021,58:16-32.
[10] SUN B, LIU Y. Business model designs, big data analytics capabilities and new product development performance: evidence from China[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2021,24(4):1162-1183.
[11] 张任之.数字平台企业高质量发展驱动形成新质生产力的内在逻辑和实现路径[J]. 理论学刊,2024,35(4):122-130.
[12] WANG J, XU C, ZHANG J. A collaborative architecture of the industrial Internet platform for manufacturing systems[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2020,61(2):101854.
[13] 权锡鉴,史晓洁,宋晓缤,等.资本配置结构优化的企业混合所有制:工业互联网平台的赋能机理与本质[J]. 会计研究,2020,36(12):99-112.
[14] GAWER A.Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(7):1239-1249.
[15] KRETSCHMER T, LEIPONEN A, SCHILLING M. Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations:implications for platform strategies[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2022,43(3):405-424.
[16] 周冬梅,朱璇玮,陈雪琳.数字平台生态系统:概念基础、研究现状与未来展望[J]. 科学学研究,2024,42(2):335-344.
[17] 邱毅,周亚铭,王节祥,等.企业如何嵌入平台生态系统推进数字化转型[J]. 外国经济与管理,2024,46(12):20-36.
[18] 杨佳铭,魏江,杨升曦.外源型参与者、平台赋能与竞争优势构建——基于资源编排理论视角[J]. 南开管理评论,2025,28(1):92-102.
[19] 左文明,丘心心.工业互联网产业集群生态系统构建——基于文本挖掘的质性研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2022,39(5):83-93.
[20] PORTER M E, HEPPELMANN J E. How smart, connected products are transforming competition[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2014,92(11):64-88.
[21] 伍先福,黄骁.工业互联网对战略性新兴产业企业盈利能力的影响[J]. 软科学,2024,38(6):82-90.
[22] ENDRES H, INDULSKA M, GHOSH A. Unlocking the potential of Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT) in the age of the industrial metaverse: business models and challenges[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2024,119:90-107.
[23] BARNEY J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991,17(1):99-120.
[24] LIN Y, WU L Y. Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014,67(3):407-413.
[25] CHEN D Q, PRESTON D S, SWINK M. How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2015,32(4):4-39.
[26] MIKALEF P,KROGSTIE J,PAPPAS I O.Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: the mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities[J].Information&Management,2020,57(2):103-169.
[27] QI Q, XU Z, RANI P. Big data analytics challenges to implementing the intelligent industrial Internet of things (IIoT) systems in sustainable manufacturing operations[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023,190:122401.
[28] ALBINSSON P A, PERERA B Y, SAUTTER P T. DART scale development: diagnosing a firm's readiness for strategic value co-creation[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2016,24(1):42-58.
[29] WU W, WANG H, WU Y J. Internal and external networks, and incubatees' performance in dynamic environments: entrepreneurial learning's mediating effect[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2021,46(6):1707-1733.
[30] CHEN H, TIAN Z. Environmental uncertainty, resource orchestration and digital transformation: a fuzzy-set QCA approach[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022,139:184-193.
[31] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
[32] FISS P C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011,54(2):393-420.
[33] 杜运周,李佳馨,刘秋辰,等.复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界,2021,37(3):180-197.
[34] 王水莲,付晗涵.工业互联网平台主导的创新生态系统价值共创机制——以海尔卡奥斯为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2025,42(2):31-39.
Outlines

/