Specialized, refined, differentiated and innovative (SRDI) enterprises, as the main carrier of innovation-driven strategy, have become the key stabilizer of the new development paradigm. SRDI enterprises driven by independent innovation have shown a good development trend in their industries. Against the backdrop of building an innovative country, it has become an important issue whether SRDI enterprises can play an exemplary role in innovation and affect the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Some scholars have paid attention to the peer effect of manufacturing enterprises, general enterprises, leading enterprises and competitors. However, no studies have yet examined the peer effect of innovative leading enterprises such as SRDI enterprises.
In view of this, this study selects listed companies from 2011 to 2021 as research samples,and examines the direct impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry as well as the moderating roles of industry competition degree and financing constraint;it further investigates the heterogeneity of the above impacts across enterprises with different ownership nature and different scales, and analyzes the threshold effect of the impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry.
The conclusions include three aspects. Firstly, from the perspective of peer effect, the innovation of SRDI enterprises positively affects the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Industry competition degree and financing constraint respectively exert positive and negative moderating roles in the impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Secondly, the results of heterogeneity analysis show that in terms of the enterprise ownership nature, the moderating role of financing constraint is not significant in state-owned enterprises in the same industry, but it is significantly negative in non-state-owned enterprises. In terms of the enterprise scale, the innovation of SRDI enterprises has a significant impact on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry of different scales, with large-scale enterprises being more affected; the moderating role of industry competition degree is not significant in large-scale enterprises in the same industry, but it is significant in small-scale enterprises; compared with small-scale enterprises in the same industry, the moderating role of financing constraint is stronger in large-scale enterprises. Thirdly, there is a double threshold effect on the innovation of SRDI enterprises positively affecting the innovation of enterprises in the same industry, and the promotion role weakens as the threshold value increases.
The theoretical contributions include three aspects. Firstly, this study focuses on the peer effect of SRDI enterprises, and expands the research on the relationship between the innovation of SRDI enterprises and the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Secondly, this study clarifies the moderating roles of industry competition degree and financing constraint, and enriches the situational research on the impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Thirdly, this study reveals the threshold effect of the impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry, clarifies the differential impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry at different levels, and deepens the research on the peer effect of SRDI enterprises.
The management implications include four aspects. Firstly, enterprises in the same industry should pay attention to the importance of the peer effect, actively keep pace with SRDI enterprises, adjust imitative behavior according to the innovation level of SRDI enterprise, and stimulate innovation vitality. Secondly, enterprises in the same industry should actively face the industry competition, give full play to the positive role of industry competition degree in the impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Thirdly, enterprises in the same industry should take the initiative to deal with financing constraint, alleviate the negative role of financing constraint in the impact of the innovation of SRDI enterprises on the innovation of enterprises in the same industry. Fourthly, enterprises in the same industry should adjust innovative strategies based on the present situations of ownership nature and scale.
[1] 董志勇, 李成明. “专精特新” 中小企业高质量发展态势与路径选择[J].改革, 2021, 37(10): 1-11.
[2] MANSKI C F. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem[J].The Review of Economic Studies, 1993, 60(3): 531-542.
[3] BIZJAK J, LEMMON M, WHITBY R. Option backdating and board interlocks[J].Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(11): 4821-4847.
[4] 王旭, 褚旭. 制造业企业绿色技术创新的同群效应研究——基于多层次情境的参照作用[J].南开管理评论, 2022, 25(2): 68-81.
[5] LIU L, YANG J G, ZHENG M N, et al. Peer effect of enterprise innovation: empirical evidence from China[J].Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 921127.
[6] MEYER J W, ROWAN B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony[J].American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83(2): 340-363.
[7] 霍春辉, 吕梦晓, 许晓娜. 数字化转型“同群效应” 与企业高质量发展——基于制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(4): 77-87.
[8] 武永霞, 刘亦楠. 企业创新效率的同群效应研究: 影响机制与经济后果[J].现代管理科学, 2025, 44(1): 124-137.
[9] 王晓亮, 杨雪. 企业绿色创新的同群效应研究——基于共同机构所有权视角[J].软科学, 2024, 38(9): 108-118.
[10] 刘淑春, 邓杭坤, 潘李鹏. 龙头企业和竞争对手对企业开放式创新的影响——基于同群效应理论[J].财经问题研究, 2025, 47(4): 41-54.
[11] 杨鑫瑶, 蔡云鹏. 上市公司自主创新同群效应研究[J].税务与经济, 2023, 45(2): 70-81.
[12] 纪玉俊, 郑敏婕. 产业集聚: 赋能企业数字化转型的空间动力[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 45(3): 28-41.
[13] 刘柏, 王馨竹. 企业创新成果与创新质量的驱动因素研究——基于同群和竞争的视角[J].宏观质量研究, 2021, 9(2): 43-58.
[14] 周绍妮, 杨欣月, 喻陈铭. 数字并购对企业创新质量的影响研究[J].经济问题, 2025, 47(4): 59-69.
[15] MANSKI C F. Economic analysis of social interactions[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000, 14(3): 115-136.
[16] 吴崇, 陈美花. 焦点同构和领先者模仿的进入模式促进企业创新绩效吗[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报), 2021, 35(5): 127-143.
[17] 张琨, 连璐瑶. 企业ESG表现具有同群效应吗——基于空间计量模型的实证检验[J].河北经贸大学学报, 2025, 46(1): 80-91.
[18] 连燕玲, 李沁, 郑伟伟. 地区间制度期望落差与企业社会责任响应行为——基于中国上市公司的经验分析[J].上海财经大学学报, 2022, 24(3): 61-75.
[19] 孙锦萍, 李亚飞, 侯麟科. 上市公司创新决策的区域同群效应研究[J].经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(7): 115-131.
[20] KNOTT A M, TURNER S F. An innovation theory of headquarters value in multi-business firms[J].Organization Science, 2019, 30(1): 19-39.
[21] 冯戈坚, 王建琼. 企业创新活动的社会网络同群效应[J].管理学报, 2019, 16(12): 1809-1819.
[22] 张艳, 方怡文. 企业绿色技术创新的策略选择——来自地区同群效应的经验证据[J].商业研究, 2022, 65(5): 58-69.
[23] 连燕玲, 叶文平, 刘依琳. 行业竞争期望与组织战略背离——基于中国制造业上市公司的经验分析[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(8): 155-172, 191-192.
[24] 蒋伟杰, 程琴琴, 王埝柯. 数字金融发展促进企业跨区域投资了吗——来自2亿工商登记注册信息的经验证据[J].南方经济,2025,44(8):46-69.
[25] 罗栋梁, 孟永涛, 刘春燕, 等. 连锁股东持股背景下企业绩效的社群效应分析[J].经济管理, 2023, 45(7): 154-172.
[26] LI R, RAO J, WAN L Y. The digital economy, enterprise digital transformation, and enterprise innovation[J].Managerial and Decision Economics, 2022, 43(7): 2875-2886.
[27] 赵奇锋, 王永中. 薪酬差距、发明家晋升与企业技术创新[J].世界经济, 2019, 42(7): 94-119.
[28] 诸竹君, 陈航宇, 王芳. 银行业外资开放与中国企业创新陷阱破解[J].中国工业经济, 2020, 37(10): 175-192.
[29] 陈金勇, 汪小池, 长昊东, 等. “专精特新” 认定政策与中小企业技术创新[J].科研管理, 2024, 45(3): 20-30.
[30] KAPLAN S N, ZINGALES L. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(1): 169-215.
[31] 高志辉, 赵浏寰, 张心灵. 企业扶贫社会责任的同群效应及其启示[J].统计与决策, 2022, 38(23): 171-175.
[32] 何欢浪, 古莲子. 社会信用体系建设与出口贸易转型升级: 来自城市失信人的经验证据[J].世界经济研究, 2025, 44(4): 58-72, 135.
[33] 陈小辉, 张红伟, 吴永超. 数字经济如何影响产业结构水平[J].证券市场导报, 2020, 30(7): 20-29.
[34] 江唐洋, 于洋, 聂军. 数字化转型会促进企业产学研合作创新吗[J].中南财经政法大学学报, 2024, 68(2): 29-39, 148.
[35] 庄序莹, 周子轩. 地方财政压力会影响企业税负粘性吗——一种企业税负“痛感” 的解释[J].当代财经, 2022, 43(6): 37-49.