The transformation to intelligent manufacturing is a crucial pathway for Chinese enterprises to achieve high-quality development and serves as a key strategy for advancing new industrialization and enhancing new productive forces. However, existing literature predominantly focuses on the benefits of smart manufacturing transformation for individual enterprises, including aspects such as total factor productivity, energy efficiency, and cost management, with limited attention to the disparities in transformation progress across enterprises or the spillover effects on upstream and downstream segments of the supply chain.
To address these gaps in the literature,this study empirically examines the supply-chainspillover effects of smart manufacturing transformation using supply-chain relationship data from Chinese A-share listed manufacturing companies between 2009 and 2022, and analyzes the underlying mechanisms driving these effects. First, it develops a theoretical framework centered on "vertical leadership" and "peer group effects". It posits that the transformation to intelligent manufacturing is not only characterized by technological innovation and network externalities, but also generates a closed-loop, synergistic diffusion effect throughout the supply chain via demonstration effects, knowledge sharing, and technology transfer. Empirical results indicate that the intelligent manufacturing capability of focal firms has a significant positive impact on their supply-chain partners; specifically, an increase of one standard deviation in the focal firm′s intelligent manufacturing level is associated with a 7-percentage-point increase in the intelligent manufacturing level of linked firms. Further robustness checks—using first-difference model, controls for industry and regional trends, instrumental variable methods, and difference-in-differences approaches—consistently confirm the robustness and significance of this positive spillover effect.
Then, the mechanism test reveals that key leading firms, particularly those in core supply-chain positions and state-owned enterprises, are more likely to exercise vertical leadership, thereby significantly enhancing the spillover effects of intelligent manufacturing transformation. Moreover, when supply-chain firms share common shareholders, the resultant peer group effect effectively facilitates the transmission of intelligent manufacturing expertise and technological information from focal firms, accelerating the coordinated transformation process among upstream and downstream enterprises.
Moreover, by analyzing the heterogeneity in the propagation direction of supply-chain spillover effects, this study finds that the intelligent manufacturing transformation of focal firms predominantly spills over to upstream suppliers, creating a "reverse pressure mechanism" that compels suppliers to proactively enhance their intelligent manufacturing capabilities to meet the transformation demands of the focal firms. In contrast, the effect on downstream customer firms is not significant, indicating that upstream supply-chain partners face greater pressure and driving forces during the transformation process. Regarding the learning behaviors of supply-chain firms, further empirical tests reveal that when firms are at a disadvantage in intelligent manufacturing within their industry or region, their transformation largely relies on conservative learning strategies—characterized by passive imitation and following—in order to mitigate market risks and swiftly narrow the gaps with more advanced peers; conversely, when conditions for proactive learning exist, this positive effect is not significant.
In summary, this paper provides an in-depth investigation of intelligent manufacturing transformation from the perspective of supply-chain spillovers, thereby supplementing and extending the existing literature on collaborative effects in firm transformation. The study not only reveals the significant positive spillover effect of focal firms′ intelligent manufacturing transformation on their supply-chain partners, but also elucidates the crucial role of core enterprises—particularly those exercising vertical leadership through their dominant positions and state ownership—in promoting overall supply-chain digitalization. Furthermore, the paper highlights that supply-chain firms generally adopt conservative and passive imitation strategies, which offers new insights for small and medium-sized enterprises confronting high-risk transformations. Drawing on these insights, the paper recommends strengthening systematic policy support for intelligent manufacturing transformation, fully leveraging the leading role of flagship and state-owned enterprises, and promoting deep inter-connectivity and information sharing among all supply-chain participants through demonstration projects and cross-sector collaborations, thereby achieving coordinated enhancement and high-quality transformation across the entire industrial chain.
Hong Xiangzhen
,
Guo Wanshan
,
Song Qi
,
Xu Dan
. The Spillover Effects and Synergy Mechanism of Intelligent Manufacturing Transformation:The Perspective of Supply Chain[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026
, 43(2)
: 48
-56
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.D202409017W
[1] 孟凡生, 赵刚. 传统制造向智能制造发展影响因素研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(1): 66-72.
[2] 沈坤荣, 乔刚, 林剑威. 智能制造政策与中国企业高质量发展[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(2): 5-25.
[3] 黄卓, 陶云清, 刘兆达, 等. 智能制造如何提升企业产能利用率——基于产消合一的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(5): 40-59.
[4] 权小锋, 李闯. 智能制造与成本粘性——来自中国智能制造示范项目的准自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(4): 68-84.
[5] 范合君, 吴婷, 何思锦. 企业数字化的产业链联动效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023,41 (3): 115-132.
[6] 焦小静. 供应链关系嵌入的创新溢出效应——基于主要客户的视角[J]. 企业经济, 2021, 40(7): 83-93.
[7] 孙慧, 夏学超, 祝树森, 等. 企业降碳减污协同推进的产业链联动效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(3): 16-29.
[8] 史梦昱, 闫佳敏. 企业ESG表现与供应商绿色创新——基于供应链视角的研究[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024, 39(3): 97-106.
[9] 黄群慧,倪红福.基于价值链理论的产业基础能力与产业链水平提升研究[J].经济体制改革,2020, 38(5):11-21.
[10] 党琳, 李雪松, 申烁. 制造业行业数字化转型与其出口技术复杂度提升[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2021,47(6): 32-47.
[11] 霍春辉, 吕梦晓, 许晓娜. 数字化转型 “同群效应” 与企业高质量发展——基于制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(4): 77-87.
[12] 齐平, 宋威辉. 链主企业对中国制造业产业链高质量发展的影响[J]. 南方经济, 2023,41 (5): 84-106.
[13] 马忠,芦雅琳.“链主”企业如何带动链上企业全要素生产率提升[J].广东财经大学学报,2024,39(3):52-65.
[14] LEARY M T, ROBERTS M R. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2014, 69(1): 139-178.
[15] 陈庆江, 王彦萌, 万茂丰. 企业数字化转型的同群效应及其影响因素研究[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(5): 653-663.
[16] FREEMAN K M. Overlapping ownership along the supply chain[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2025, 60(1): 105-134.
[17] 陈凯旋, 张树山. 产业链链主何以赋能本地企业全要素生产率[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2023,41(6): 1-11.
[18] DAI R, LIANG H, NG L. Socially responsible corporate customers[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 142(2): 598-626.
[19] 温素彬, 张金泉, 焦然. 智能制造、市场化程度与企业运营效率——基于A股制造业上市公司年报的文本分析[J]. 会计研究, 2022, 43(11): 102-117.
[20] 马骏, 李书娴, 李江雁. 被动模仿还是主动变革 ——上市公司互联网涉入的同群效应研究[J]. 经济评论, 2021, 42(5): 86-101.