In the digital economy era, the traditional boundaries between enterprises and the market are gradually being dismantled. The deep integration of digital technology and production operations has become a crucial driver of innovation and development. By further stimulating group wisdom and deepening open innovation through this integration, manufacturing enterprises can gain a competitive edge. However, Chinese manufacturing enterprises currently face challenges in leveraging digital technology to promote open innovation. There is a lack of scientific and systematic theoretical methods to guide their efforts. Additionally, research on the composition of digital technology affordance and its mechanisms in promoting open innovation is still limited. This gap makes it difficult for enterprises to effectively implement open innovation strategies that are well-adapted to the complex and dynamic environment of the digital economy.
Drawing to technology affordance theory, this study delves into how the accumulative and variable affordances of digital technology drive open innovation in manufacturing enterprises. To ensure sample representativeness, the study selects four types of manufacturing enterprises undergoing digital transformation, namely "digital transport equipment manufacturing", "digital general and special-purpose equipment manufacturing", "digital electrical machinery,apparatus and instrument manufacturing", and "other smart manufacturing", based on the "Classification of Digital Economy and Its Core Industries (2021)" released by the National Bureau of Statistics. It also selects samples from enterprises in regions with different levels of digital development. The study employs a combination of paper-based and e-mail questionnaires to survey middle- and senior-level managers in relevant enterprises, using a multi-time-point data collection method to reduce common method bias and better capture the relationships between variables.
By empirically examining data from a sample of 312 manufacturing firms, the study finds that (1) both accumulation affordance and variation affordance have a significant positive impact on open innovation in manufacturing firms; (2) resource reorganization and resource relocation are key links connecting the affordance of digital technologies and open innovation in manufacturing firms, playing a partly mediating role; (3) managerial digital cognition is an important internal contextual factor in the process of enterprise digital transformation, which can enhance the effect of cumulative affordance on resource relocation, and at the same time improve the effect of variable affordance on resource reorganization; while it does not play a significant moderating role in the relationship between cumulative affordance and resource reorganization, and variable affordance and resource relocation.
This study makes both theoretical and methodological contributions as follows. First, it develops a novel theoretical analytical framework of 'digital technology affordance-resource reconfiguration-open innovation', which remedies the insufficient explanatory power of existing theories regarding the impact mechanism of digital transformation on open innovation in manufacturing enterprises. Second, it empirically verifies the role of managerial digital cognition in the transmission pathway through which digital technology affordance affects open innovation, thus further clarifying the key boundary conditions for effective open innovation in the context of manufacturing digital transformation.
From a practical perspective, the findings imply that manufacturing firms should take business needs as the guide and advance open innovation by integrating accumulative and variable affordances in a coordinated manner. Meanwhile, enterprises need to leverage the "multiplier effect" of digital resources and expand the scope of open innovation by utilizing market data to accurately capture customer demands and potential business opportunities, dynamically reshaping resource systems to enhance organizational agility, and adopting data analytics to explore new approaches to resource utilization and optimize targeted resource reallocation. In addition, organizations should actively upgrade managerial digital cognition to provide core strategic support for the formulation and implementation of innovation-driven development strategies in the digital era. This can be achieved by regularly conducting training programs on digital technology applications and data element utilization, as well as by strengthening managers' understanding and mastery of the underlying logical framework and architecture of digital operation systems.
Wu Linfei
,
Sun Jinshu
,
Sun Liwen
. How Digital Technology Affordance Enables Open Innovation in Manufacturing-Enterprises: The Perspective of Resource Reconfiguration[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026
, 43(2)
: 37
-47
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.D42025010603
[1] CHESBROUGH H W. The era of open innovation[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, 44(3): 35-41.
[2] 戚聿东, 肖旭. 数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(6): 135-152.
[3] XIE W H, ZOU Y K, GUO H Z, et al. What drives digital innovation cycles:evidence from manufacturing enterprises in China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 204: 123449.
[4] CHATTERJEE S, MOODY G, LOWRY P B, et al. Information technology and organizational innovation: harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(1): 101596.
[5] NORMAN D A. Affordance, conventions, and design[J]. Interactions, 1999, 6(3): 38-43.
[6] 程聪, 缪泽锋, 严璐璐, 等. 数字技术可供性与企业数字创新价值关系研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(5): 915-925.
[7] 苏郁锋, 周翔. “直播电商”情境下数字机会共创机制研究: 基于数字可供性视角的质性研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(1): 106-119.
[8] NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, et al. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
[9] WU L F, SUN L W, CHANG Q, et al. How do digitalization capabilities enable open innovation in manufacturing enterprises? a multiple case study based on resource integration perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 184: 122019.
[10] 金珺, 陈赞, 李诗婧. 数字化开放式创新对企业创新绩效的影响研究——以知识场活性为中介[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2020, 32(6): 39-49.
[11] 张华, 顾新. 数字化能力、开放式创新与企业绩效——创新独占性的调节效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2023, 44(6): 132-149.
[12] 陶小龙, 刘珊, 钟雨芮, 等. 大数据应用与企业开放式创新的协同演化——基于扎根理论的对比性案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(5): 69-78.
[13] 汪志红, 周建波. 数字技术可供性对企业商业模式创新的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(11): 1666-1674.
[14] BRIEL F V, DAVIDSSON P, RECKER J. Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018, 42(1): 47-69.
[15] KHIN S, HO T C. Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance[J]. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2019, 11(2): 177-195.
[16] NAMBISAN S, SIEGEL D, KENNEY M. On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(3): 354-368.
[17] 张培, 吴溧楠. 企业数字创新过程中关键主体数字技术可供性的影响机理: 基于自研数字平台的纵向案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(24): 23-35.
[18] 周丹, 魏江. 制造企业—知识型服务机构互动作用与运营绩效的机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(12): 8-16.
[19] BOWMAN C, AMBROSINI V. How the resource-based and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform competitive and corporate level strategy[J]. British Journal of Management, 2003, 14(4): 289-303.
[20] AMIT R, HAN X. Value creation through novel resource configurations in a digitally enabled world[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2017, 11(3): 228-242.
[21] 张昆贤, 陈晓蓉. 谁在推动数字化 ——一项基于高阶理论和烙印理论视角的经验研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2021, 42(10): 68-87.
[22] HAMBRICK D C, FINKELSTEIN S. Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1987, 9: 369-406.
[23] 陈岩, 高程, 杜慧林. 专精特新中小企业高层管理者认知对精一创业能力影响机理研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(21): 151-160.
[24] 李云健, 张振刚, 李莉, 等. 管理者认知、开放式创新与企业成长——两职合一的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(8): 86-93.
[25] JIAO H, ZHAO G Z. When will employees embrace managers' technological innovations the mediating effects of employees' perceptions of fairness on their willingness to accept change and its legitimacy[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(4): 780-798.
[26] RASS M, DUMBACH M, DANZINGER F, et al. Open innovation and firm performance: the mediating role of social capital[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2013, 22(2): 177-194.