Innovation and Entrepreneurship Theory

Characteristics and Evolution of the Innovation System for Key Core Technologies: Deconstructing the Multi-Layer KTI Coupled Network

  • Yu Qian ,
  • Dong Bingxue ,
  • Liu Nian
Expand
  • (School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Received date: 2024-09-10

  Revised date: 2025-02-05

  Online published: 2025-11-04

Abstract

In the context of the rapid advancement of new technological revolution and industrial transformation,key core technologies serve as a decisive force in enhancing national competitiveness and ensuring national security, directly influencing a country′s ability to seize the initiative in international strategic competition. Unlike general technologies, key core technologies encompass a series of continuously evolving innovation processes, including knowledge innovation, technology incubation, and the development of key products. The complexity and dynamics of these technologies have led to a lack of consensus in research concerning their definition and identification. This paper thus focuses on the issue of innovation breakthroughs in key core technologies from multidimensional perspectives, including knowledge, technology, and industry. Existing literature primarily emphasizes single-dimensional analyses of knowledge, technology, or industry, without fully developing a comprehensive theoretical framework that encapsulates the intricate dynamics of an integrated innovation system. Moreover, the dynamic and complex coupling interaction mechanisms between system innovation actors during technological breakthroughs, as well as the laws of technological evolution, remain areas in need of further investigation. Therefore, this paper, from the perspective of multi-layer coupled networks, explores the characteristics and evolution of the "knowledge-technology-industry" (KTI) coupled innovation system for key core technologies.
This study first defines the concept of key core technologies. Next, it delves into the analysis of the KTI coupled innovation system through the lens of a multi-layered coupled network approach, which reveals the core logic of innovation. This logic is structured around a sequence of stages: starting with fundamental knowledge innovation, proceeding to breakthroughs in technological principles, and culminating in the development of new technologies. On the basis of the definition of key core technologies and system characteristics, a method for identifying such technologies based on multi-layer coupled innovation network analysis is proposed. This method integrates complex network topology feature measurements, higher-order invariant models, and multiple PageRank centrality algorithms. Finally, the study explores the evolutionary characteristics and critical conditions of the KTI coupled innovation system at different stages of its lifecycle and proposes future research directions to promote breakthroughs in key core technologies.
The results show that the multi-layer coupled innovation network of key core technologies exhibits both multi-layeredness and coupling, with corresponding nodes displaying dynamic core and critical properties. To refine the concept of key core technologies, it is essential to adopt a holistic approach that transcends the examination of individual technologies or isolated layers. The process should initiate with a thorough evaluation of the foundational technological knowledge, the underlying structural framework, and the platforms facilitating transformational applications.A significant focus should be on the (KTI) coupled innovation system, which is central to understanding the complex interactions and couplings between knowledge, technology, and industry subsystems. By analyzing the joint effects within and between layers of knowledge, technology, and collaborative R&D networks in the multi-layer coupled network, key core technologies can be identified. The pursuit of breakthroughs in key core technologies is a dynamic and long-term systemic challenge. By analyzing the stage-specific characteristics and critical conditions of the KTI coupled innovation system′s lifecycle and designing network governance mechanisms, the effectiveness and resilience of system innovation can be enhanced, facilitating breakthroughs in key core technologies.
This paper introduces innovation system theory and complex system theory, providing new research perspectives and directions for the multidimensional exploration of the KTI coupled innovation system. It also offers new methods for exploring the dynamic and complex coupling interaction mechanisms among actors within the innovation system. On the basis of the evolution of the KTI coupled innovation system, the paper investigates the evolution patterns and breakthrough development directions of key core technologies. The paper provides theoretical and methodological support for systematically understanding the essence and evolution of key core technologies, guiding innovation actors in overcoming technological bottlenecks. The findings are crucial for promoting the effective coupling of innovation resources and R&D needs, formulating technological innovation policies and strategic plans by governments and management departments, achieving independent and controllable key core technologies, and ensuring national security and international competitiveness.

Cite this article

Yu Qian , Dong Bingxue , Liu Nian . Characteristics and Evolution of the Innovation System for Key Core Technologies: Deconstructing the Multi-Layer KTI Coupled Network[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026 , 43(2) : 24 -36 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.D2024090276

References

[1] 陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦.“十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解: 识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J]. 改革,2020,42(12):5-15.
[2] 王超,许海云,齐砚翠,等.知识网络视角下科学、技术、产业间创新驱动关系识别方法研究[J].情报学报,2024,43(1):10-24.
[3] 余江,陈凤,张越,等.铸造强国重器:关键核心技术突破的规律探索与体系构建[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(3):339-343.
[4] 阳镇.关键核心技术:多层次理解及其突破[J]. 创新科技,2023,23(1):14-24.
[5] 冯堃,李显君,熊昱,等.关键核心技术研究综述:概念、结构、突破路径与机制[J].科研管理,2023,44(12):21-30.
[6] 余维新,熊文明.关键核心技术军民融合协同创新机理及协同机制研究——基于创新链视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2020,41(12):34-39.
[7] 曹琨,吴新年,白光祖,等.基于“科学—技术”复杂网络的关键核心技术识别研究——以数控机床领域为例[J].数据分析与知识发现,2025,9(3):42-55.
[8] LUNDVALL B A. Product innovation and user-producer interaction[M]. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press, 1985.
[9] BERGEK A, JACOBSSON S, CARLSSON B, et al. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 407-429.
[10] MARKARD J,TRUFFER B.Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(4): 596-615.
[11] BOLLOBAS B. Modern graph theory[M]. New York: Springer, 1998.
[12] MINCHENG W, SHIBO H, YONGTAO Z, et al. A tensor-based framework for studying eigenvector multicentrality in multilayer networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 116(31): 15407-15413.
[13] 习近平.在网络安全和信息化工作座谈会上的讲话(2016年4月19日)[M].北京:人民出版社,2016.
[14] European Commission. Commission recommends carrying out risk assessments on four critical technology areas: advanced semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum, biotechnologies[EB/OL]. [2023-10-03].https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_4735.
[15] CAROLINE S WAGNER, STEVEN W POPPER.Identifying critical technologies in the United States: a review of the federal effort[J].Journal of Forecasting,2003,22(2):113-128.
[16] NONAKA I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organizational Science, 1994, 5(1): 14-37.
[17] 韩凤芹,史卫,陈亚平.以大战略观统领关键核心技术攻关[J].宏观经济研究,2021,43(3):111-119,159.
[18] 袁野,汪书悦,陶于祥.人工智能关键核心技术创新能力测度体系构建:基于创新生态系统视角[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(18):84-93.
[19] 陈峰.论国家关键核心技术竞争情报[J].情报杂志,2019,38(11):1-5.
[20] 卢秉恒.增材制造技术——现状与未来[J].中国机械工程,2020,31(1):19-23.
[21] 阳镇,陈劲.拨开迷雾:“卡脖子”技术的再审视及其破解[J].开放时代,2023,42(4):79-92,7.
[22] 马费成,刘向.科学知识网络的演化模型[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(2): 437-443.
[23] 高霞,陈凯华.合作创新网络结构演化特征的复杂网络分析[J].科研管理,2015,36(6):28-36.
[24] 刘晓燕,孙丽娜,裘靖文,等.基于多层网络的人工智能领域跨界技术融合[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2022,19(1):45-51.
[25] MIKKO K, ALEXANDRE A, MARC B, et al.Multilayer networks[J]. Journal of Complex Networks, 2014, 2(3): 203-271.
[26] FREEMAN C. The determinants of innovation: market demand, technology, and the response to social problems[J]. Futures, 1979, 11(3): 206-215.
[27] 杨博旭,王玉荣,李兴光.“厚此薄彼”还是“雨露均沾”——组织如何有效利用网络嵌入资源提高创新绩效[J].南开管理评论,2019,22(3):201-213.
[28] KIVELA M, ARENAS A, BARTHELEMY M, et al. Multilayer networks[J]. Journal of Complex Networks, 2014, 2(3): 203-271.
[29] NG M K, LI X, YE Y. MultiRank: co-ranking for objects and relations in multi-relational data[C]. New York: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,2011.
[30] LV L S, ZHANG K, ZHANG T, et al. Nodes and layers PageRank centrality for multilayer networks[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2019, 28(2): 129-136.
[31] BURT S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2): 349-399.
[32] SAHNEH F D,SCOGLIO C,CHOWDHURY F N.Effect of coupling on the epidemic threshold in interconnected complex networks: a spectral analysis[C]. Washington:2013 American Control Conference, 2013.
Outlines

/