Enterprise Sci-tech Innovation

How Does U.S. Policy of Technology Decoupling from China Affect the Resilience of Enterprise Supply Chains?

  • Liu Fan ,
  • Qin Xutian
Expand
  • (School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China)

Received date: 2024-07-12

  Revised date: 2024-11-22

  Online published: 2025-11-03

Abstract

Led by the US, developed countries have modified supply policies towards China, seeking technological decoupling via a "de-Chinaized" supply chain. In response, China has introduced a “double-cycle” development strategy. Enterprises are the core forces to cope with changes in the trade pattern, and ensuring the resilience of enterprise supply chains and security is the top priority for realizing high-quality economic development. Currently, there are few studies in the academic community that utilize U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China as an empirical target to investigate the resilience of enterprise supply chains. This research gap could potentially hinder China's ability to manage the risks inherent in a volatile global market. Therefore, in the context of China's new round of opening-up policy, it is important to explore how U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China affects the resilience of enterprise supply chains, which provides a basis for how enterprises can enhance supply chain resilience in the complex international situation. This research is of great theoretical significance and practical value for the promotion of high-level opening to the outside world in line with the double-cycle development strategy.
To explore the impact of U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China on the resilience of enterprise supply chains, this study utilizes a sample of A-share listed firms from the period 2010-2022 to investigate this impact. The starting time of the US-China technology decoupling policy is identified as 2018. The impact of the US-China tech-nology decoupling policy on the cooperation between enterprises and their upstream and downstream partners is significant. Specifically, customer sales (Y1) and supplier procurement (Y2) are considered as the dependent variables.
The analysis yields some findings . First, the U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China significantly enhances the resilience of enterprise supply chains, and this finding remains reliable after the robustness test. Second, the heterogeneity analysis shows that the resilience of enterprise supply chains is more significantly positively affected by U.S. technology decoupling from China for the non-state-owned enterprises, eastern region, and high-tech industry categories. Third, further research has found that the U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China promotes corporate supplier procurement volumes by driving supply chain efficiency. Additionally, this policy enhances the resilience of enterprise supply chains by increasing supply chain concentration. However, the U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China also inhibits the improvement of resilience of enterprise supply chains through the complexity of supply chain collaborations.
This article makes novel contributions to the research on enterprise supply chain resilience. Firstly, it offers fresh empirical evidence, a significant advancement since the current literature is heavily reliant on qualitative analyses and lacks empirical studies on the relationship between the U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China and supply chain resilience. By integrating both qualitative and quantitative analysis methods, this paper uncovers this relationship, thereby providing valuable empirical evidence for management science research on supply chain resilience. Secondly, it expands and enriches the theoretical research on U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China and resilience of enterprise supply chains. Most of the existing studies examine this issue from the macro level of industry and national strategy. In this paper, from the micro level of enterprises, we discuss how the enterprise supply chains can cope with the unfavorable impacts brought by the changes in the international situation, so as to enrich the theoretical content of the relevant research. Lastly, the paper provides actionable strategies to bolster the resilience of Chinese enterprise supply chains. Given the frequent occurrence of unforeseen events in science and technology policies and international relations, and the scarcity of studies on the influence mechanisms and operational frameworks behind these uncertainties, this paper elucidates the mechanism of U.S. policy of technology decoupling from China affecting the resilience of enterprise supply chains, and provides effective practical insights for enterprises to enhance the resilience of supply chain.

Cite this article

Liu Fan , Qin Xutian . How Does U.S. Policy of Technology Decoupling from China Affect the Resilience of Enterprise Supply Chains?[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2026 , 43(1) : 93 -102 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2024070412

References

[1] 周琪.美国对中国科技“脱钩”的战略动机及政策措施[J].太平洋学报,2022,30(8):1-25.
[2] 李峥.美国推动中美科技“脱钩”的深层动因及长期趋势[J].现代国际关系,2020,14(1):32-40.
[3] 陈绍锋.国家间商品贸易的武器化与反武器化[J].国际政治研究,2023,44(6):70-91,6-7.
[4] 戴建平,骆温平.供应链多边合作价值创造实证研究——基于物流企业与供应链成员多边合作的视角[J].当代经济管理,2018,40(5):15-25.
[5] 何明珂.新阶段全球半导体供应链重构及其思考[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2023,38(1):62-76.
[6] 李宏兵,赵路犇,翟瑞瑞.全球芯片供应链调整的新动向及中国应对[J].国际贸易,2023,3(2):19-27.
[7] 张杰.中美战略格局下全球供应链演变的新趋势与新对策[J].探索与争鸣,2020,10(12):37-52,198.
[8] 苏庆义.全球供应链安全与效率关系分析[J].国际政治科学,2021,6(2):1-32.
[9] ZHANG Y L, ZHU X D .Analysis of the global trade network of the chip industry chain: does the U.S.-China tech war matter[J].Heliyon,2023,9(6):e17092.
[10] ELLIOT M, GOLUB B, LEDUC M V. Supply network formation and fragility[J]. American Economic Review,2022,112(8):2701-2747.
[11] KINNET M R, WEMPE W F. Futher evidece on the extent and origins of JIT′s profitability effects [J]. The Accounting Review,2022,77(1):2701-2747.
[12] CHRISTOPHER M, PECK H. Building the resilient supply chain[J]. The International Journal of Logistics Management,2004,15(2):1-14.
[13] 张杰,陈容.中国产业链供应链安全的风险研判与维护策略[J].改革,2022,2(4):12-20.
[14] 朱战国,张彤.三重冲击下农业企业如何实现供应链韧性提升——以温氏为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(5):178-190.
[15] GONELLA L S D J,DELIBERADOR R L,VFIHO G M,et al.Resilience and risk management in agribusiness supply chain: a systematic literature review[J].World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research,2022,11(2):155-170.
[16] BROWN A, BADURDEEN F. Increased supply chain resilience through consideration of disruption impact severity in the supplier segmentation process[C]//IISE Annual Conference. Proceedings. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), 2015: 1815.
[17] 杨长春,张潇,何明珂. 大变局下全球中高端制造供应链重构趋势及我国对策[J]. 经济管理,2022,44(5):5-23.
[18] 余振,周冰惠,谢旭斌,等.参与全球价值链重构与中美贸易摩擦[J].中国工业经济,2018,1(7):24-42.
[19] 郎昆,李新成.贸易政策不确定性是否倒逼中国企业创新[J].国际贸易问题,2024,6(1):87-104.
[20] 夏芸,张茂,熊泽胥,等.贸易政策不确定性与企业技术创新投融资决策——基于中美贸易摩擦的分析[J].产业经济评论,2023,5(3):75-95.
[21] 袁淳,肖土盛,耿春晓,等.数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济,2021,8(9):137-155.
[22] TALBI S,ACHOUR S,ABKARY B.Communication catalysts: how personal ties enhance supply chain efficiency[J].Journal of Business and Management Studies,2024,6(2):17-31.
[23] 刘婧怡.供应链中断:成因、后果及对策——供应链治理视角下的文献述评[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2022,11(4):130-144.
[24] 盛昭瀚,王海燕,胡志华.供应链韧性:适应复杂性——基于复杂系统管理视角[J].中国管理科学,2022,30(11):1-7.
[25] 崔晓敏,熊婉婷,杨盼盼,等.全球供应链脆弱性测度——基于贸易网络方法的分析[J].统计研究,2022,39(8):38-52.
[26] 巫强,姚雨秀.企业数字化转型与供应链配置:集中化还是多元化[J].中国工业经济,2023,6(8):99-117.
[27] 谷城,徐杰.供应链政策与供应链效率——基于供应链创新与应用的准自然实验[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2024,40(1):33-48.
[28] FENG M. Does ineffective internal control over financial reporting affect a firm′s operations? evidence from firms′ inventory management[J]. The Accounting Review, 2015,90(2):529-557.
[29] 焦豪,李宛蓉.资质认定与企业供应链伙伴数量——基于专精特新“小巨人”企业的准自然实验[J].经济学动态,2023,8(12):109-125.
[30] 渠慎宁,杨丹辉.逆全球化下中美经济脱钩风险的领域与应对策略[J].财经问题研究,2021,11(7):102-109.
[31] HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, Todd E P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1997, 65(4): 605-654.
Outlines

/