In the era of digital economy, digital innovation is an important way for enterprises to gain sustainable competitive advantage. However, the existing literature still lacks research on the concept connotation, classification, and theoretical construction of digital innovation. In view of the limitations of the research in the field of digital innovation, this study is committed to deepening and clarifying the essence and connotation of digital innovation, expanding the classification system of digital innovation, and further systematically constructing a comprehensive theoretical framework to grasp the whole process of digital innovation from germination to achievement.
Firstly, this study redefines the connotation of digital innovation by literature analysis and puts forward the key role of digital innovation ability in digital innovation. This study holds that digital innovation refers to the process that organizations with digital resources build their own digital innovation capabilities by means of digital technology, and then produce digital innovation results. The connotation of digital innovation under this definition includes four core points, namely, digital resources, digital technology, digital innovation ability and digital innovation output.
Secondly, the study redefines the types of digital innovation. In addition to the traditional digital product innovation, digital service innovation, digital process innovation, digital organization innovation and digital business model innovation, it puts forward a new type of digital innovation-digital technology innovation. This kind of innovation includes not only new digital products and services, but also new digital technologies and solutions, with an emphasis on the innovation iteration of digital technology itself.
Thirdly, on the basis of defining the connotation and types of digital innovation, a brand-new theoretical research framework of digital innovation is constructed. Through a comprehensive literature review and analysis, the framework is developed to encompass three dimensions. The first is the vertical realization mechanism of digital innovation. In accordance with the results of six types of digital innovation output, this study discusses a series of processes for how to realize digital innovation output by relying on digital resources, using digital technology and building digital innovation ability. Next, the horizontal driving mechanism of digital innovation reveals the cause and effect of digital innovation and its boundary conditions: from the motivation and demand of digital innovation, to the implementation and execution of digital innovation, and then to the result and influence of digital innovation. Finally, the influence of digital innovation environment on the process of realizing and driving digital innovation, including market environment, policy environment, and technical environment are explored.
Lastly, grounded in the above theoretical framework, the study puts forward four future research trends and directions of digital innovation. This involves delving into the capabilities for digital innovation, tracing the dynamic evolution and iterative processes of digital technology innovation, examining the underlying mechanisms that drive digital innovation, and enhancing theoretical studies on digital innovation within the unique context of China to offer theoretical insights that can inform and guide the practical implementation of digital innovation.
The research conclusion and theoretical contribution of this paper include three aspects: (1) In definies the connotation of digital innovation and puts forward the key role of digital innovation ability in the process of digital innovation. This not only enriches the understanding and knowledge of the connotation of digital innovation in the existing research, but also highlights the powerful supporting role of digital innovation ability in the process of digital innovation. (2) The types of digital innovation are re-divided, and a new type of digital innovation is put forward. On the basis of existing research, the essence and connotation of digital innovation are further explored. Considering the programmability of digital technology, it can realize its own updating and iterative upgrading in the process of digital innovation, and then a new digital technology is derived. It is proposed that digital technology innovation should also be one of the types of digital innovation, which has certain innovation. (3) The theoretical research framework of digital innovation is constructed. This not only expands and perfects the theoretical research of digital innovation in China, but also has certain guiding value for the practice of digital innovation in enterprises.
[1] PERGELOVA A, MANOLOVA T, SIMEONOVA-GANEVA R, et al. Democratizing entrepreneurship? digital technologies and the internationalization of female-led SMEs[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2019, 57(1):14-39.
[2] NAMBISAN S, WRIGHT M, FELDMAN M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8):103773.
[3] YOO Y, HENFRIDSSON O, LYYTINEN K. Research commentary——the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735.
[4] YOO Y, BOLAND JR R J, LYYTINEN K, et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1398-1408.
[5] FICHMAN R G, DOS SANTOS B L, ZHENG Z. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2014, 38(2):315-329.
[6] NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Digital innovation management[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
[7] 刘洋,董久钰,魏江. 数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J].管理世界,2020,36(7):198-217, 219.
[8] 陶锋,朱盼,邱楚芝,等.数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(5):68-91.
[9] 闫俊周,姬婉莹,熊壮. 数字创新研究综述与展望[J].科研管理,2021,42(4):11-20.
[10] CIRIELLO R F, RICHTER A, SCHWABE G. Digital innovation[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2018, 60(6): 563-569.
[11] JAHANMIR S F, CAVADAS J. Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88(7): 337-343.
[12] 陈晓红.数字经济时代的技术融合与应用创新趋势分析[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2018,24(5):1-8.
[13] 罗兴武,张皓,刘洋,等.数字平台企业如何从事件中塑造数字创新能力——基于事件系统理论的钉钉成长案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2023,26(4):234-247.
[14] 廖民超,蒋玉石,金佳敏,等.创新生态系统下的企业数字创新能力——内涵重构与量表开发[J].软科学,2023,37(5):62-70.
[15] WANG M, TENG W. Digital innovation and firm environmental performance: the mediating role of supply chain management capabilities[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 897080.
[16] PASCHOU T, RAPACCINI M, ADRODEGARI F, et al. Digital servitization in manufacturing: a systematic literature review and research agenda[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 89: 278-292.
[17] AMIT R, ZOTT C. Value creation in e-business[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6-7): 493-520.
[18] OSTERWALDER A, PIGNEUR Y, TUCCI C L. Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2005, 16(1):1-25.
[19] KHIN S, HO T C F. Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: a mediating role of digital innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2018, 11(2): 177-195.
[20] 阳镇.数字经济如何驱动企业高质量发展——核心机制、模式选择与推进路径[J].上海财经大学学报,2023,25(3):92-107.
[21] ADNER R, PURANAM P, ZHU F. What is different about digital strategy? from quantitative to qualitative change[J]. Strategy Science, 2019, 4(4): 253-261.
[22] 汪志红,周建波.数字技术可供性对企业商业模式创新的影响研究[J].管理学报,2022,19(11):1666-1674.
[23] HAEFNER N, WINCENT J, PARIDA V, et al. Artificial intelligence and innovation management: a review, framework, and research agenda[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 162: 120392.
[24] NASIRI M, SAUNILA M, UKKO J, et al. Shaping digital innovation via digital-related capabilities[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2023, 25(3): 1063-1080.
[25] LIU Y, DONG J, MEI L, et al. Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: an affordance perspective[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102458.
[26] YEOW A, SOH C, HANSEN R. Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2018, 27(1): 43-58.
[27] CHILD J. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment:retrospect and prospect[J]. Organization Studies, 1997, 18(1): 43-76.
[28] LIU Y, DONG J, YING Y, et al. Status and digital innovation: a middle-status conformity perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 168: 120781.
[29] SHU C, ZHOU K Z, XIAO Y, et al. How green management influences product innovation in China: the role of institutional benefits[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 133: 471-485.
[30] YANG J, ZHANG F, JIANG X, et al. Strategic flexibility, green management, and firm competitiveness in an emerging economy[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 101: 347-356.