The rapid pace of technological innovation and paradigm shifts has elevated accurate technological forecasting from an academic pursuit to a strategic necessity in the global competition for technological leadership. Emerging technologies, with their strategic importance, are pivotal for innovation strategy, especially in the face of oligopolistic and monopolistic pressures in key technological sectors. Accurately predicting these technologies is vital for China's tech advancement and innovation-driven growth, despite their inherent uncertainty and complexity posing significant challenges.
This paper proposes an innovative technological forecasting model that integrates patent analysis methods with TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) to accurately identify and predict the development stages and future trends of emerging technologies. The core innovation of the study lies in breaking through the limitations of traditional technology forecasting methods. Commonly used technology forecasting methods include qualitative methods (such as expert surveys, systems analysis) and quantitative methods (such as trend analysis, econometric models). Qualitative forecasting methods often rely on experts' judgment, and when facing rapidly developing emerging technologies, cognitive biases and other subjective limitations are magnified. Quantitative forecasting models, although scientific to a certain extent, are usually based on historical data and struggle to capture the nonlinear leaps of emerging technologies. Moreover, existing research mainly focuses on patent numbers, lacking sufficient understanding and interpretation regarding the essence of technology. TRIZ theory, as a systematic innovation methodology, can predict the possible future evolution paths of technology by studying the objective laws and development trends of technological systems. This theory considers the internal contradictions and problems of technological systems, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of the maturity of existing technologies, and its predictive results are more forward-looking and scientifically valuable. This paper creatively combines patent analysis with TRIZ theory to form a forecasting model that complements qualitative and quantitative methods. Patent analysis provides objective data support for the model, while TRIZ theory injects a systematic innovative thinking framework, allowing for a deeper exploration of the internal contradictions and development laws of technological systems.
The methodology of the model is based on a systematic patent data analysis strategy. First, high-quality patent information sets are established through precise collection and strict preprocessing from multiple patent databases. Second, time series analysis methods are used to deeply mine the temporal trends of patent applications and publications. By constructing multi-dimensional indicators such as the number of patent applications and citation frequency, technology evolution maps are drawn, forming a dynamic and panoramic understanding of emerging technology fields. Third, technology development directions are accurately identified through patent text clustering and multi-dimensional analysis of International Patent Classification (IPC) numbers. Fourth, the S-curve method and patent calculation methods are combined to judge the level of technology development by analyzing the technology life cycle. Fifth, a multi-dimensional assessment model for technology development potential is established through literature text clustering and patent portfolio analysis techniques.
The paper takes the technology of new energy vehicle power battery as a specific research object to empirically test the proposed forecasting model. The study selects patent data from 2000 to 2023, and the model's prediction accuracy reaches 86.67%, fully verifying the scientific reliability of the model. The study finds that this emerging technology field has shown a continuous high-speed growth trend in recent years and exhibits significant dynamic technological evolution characteristics. In various subfields such as energy management technology, system optimization technology, electrical measurement and state monitoring, vehicle air conditioning, mechanical balance testing, and vehicle maintenance, there is significant technological development potential and broad innovation space. Specifically, innovation in energy management technology has become a key driver for breakthroughs in new energy vehicle battery technology. The rapid development of battery recycling and cascade utilization technology not only reflects the systematic progress of technology but also reflects China's strategic layout in the field of sustainable development technology. This research fills the theoretical void in existing technology forecasting methods and provides significant methodological support for national strategies for scientific and technological innovation.
Sun Xiaoming
,
Yuan Siyi
,
Peng Zhenzhen
,
Zhang Shuo
,
Liu Tianli
. An Emerging Technology Forecasting Model Based on Patent Analysis and TRIZ:A Case Study of New Energy Vehicle Power Batteries[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(17)
: 101
-112
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.Q202407086
[1] 牢牢把握在国家发展大局中的战略定位 奋力开创黑龙江高质量发展新局面[N].人民日报,2023-09-09.
[2] 魏明珠,郑荣,高志豪,等.融合知识图谱和深度神经网络的产业新兴技术预测模型研究[J].情报学报,2022,41(11):1134-1148.
[3] 孙笑明,王晨卉,李泽贤,等.产品预研研究回顾及展望[J].创新科技,2024,24(2):14-30.
[4] 王玏,吴新年.新兴技术识别方法研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(4):125-135.
[5] ALTSHULLER G S. The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity[M].MA:Technical Innovation Center, Inc., 1999.
[6] 郭彦彦,吴福象.基于TRIZ的中国关键技术突破路径研究——一个系统框架[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(21):1-10.
[7] 旷景明,兰小筠.基于专利信息分析的创新技术预测方法综述[J].情报杂志,2014,33(9):33-39,50.
[8] 姚威,储昭卫,胡顺顺.TRIZ真的是创新“点金术”吗——对浙江省TRIZ应用效果的分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(4):10-19.
[9] 门玉英,邓援超,吴德胜,等.面向湖北重要创新主体的技术创新方法服务功能与模式研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(19):50-57.
[10] ROTOLO D, HICKS D, MARTIN B R. What is an emerging technology[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(10): 1827-1843.
[11] 王宏,刘沁莹,胡玉峰,等.基于多源数据融合的新兴技术识别方法研究[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(5):21-31.
[12] LENZ R C. A heuristic approach to technology measurement[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1985, 27(2-3): 249-264.
[13] MARTIN B R. Foresight in science and technology[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1995, 7(2): 139-168.
[14] CHO Y, DAIM T.OLED TV technology forecasting using technology mining and the Fisher-Pry diffusion model[J]. Foresight, 2016, 18(2): 117-137.
[15] 张韵君,柳飞红.基于专利分析的技术预测概念模型[J].情报杂志,2014,33(3):22-27.
[16] 张昱,曾文.面向产业技术创新的情报分析方法思考[J].情报理论与实践,2023,46(12):14-20.
[17] 刘玉梅,温馨,孟翔飞.基于技术轨道跃迁的突破性技术预测方法及应用研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(11):39-45.
[18] SCHIEBEL E, HRLESBERGER M, ROCHE I, et al. An advanced diffusion model to identify emergent research issues: the case of optoelectronic devices[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(3): 765-781.
[19] 黄璐,朱一鹤,张嶷.基于加权网络链路预测的新兴技术主题识别研究[J].情报学报,2019,38(4):335-341.
[20] 董放,刘宇飞,周源.基于LDA-SVM论文摘要多分类新兴技术预测[J].情报杂志,2017,36(7):40-45,133.
[21] 刘宇飞,尹力,张凯,等.基于深度迁移学习的技术术语识别——以数控系统领域为例[J].情报杂志,2019,38(10):168-175.
[22] 许学国,桂美增.基于深度学习的技术预测方法——以机器人技术为例[J].情报杂志,2020,39(8):53-62.
[23] 楼旭明,张程锦,唐影. 基于专利分析和TRIZ理论的无人机技术态势研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(2): 56-62.
[24] EKMEKCI I, NEBATI E E. TRIZ methodology and applications[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2019, 158: 303-315.
[25] ILEVBARE I M, PROBERT D, PHAAL R. A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice[J]. Technovation, 2013, 33(2-3): 30-37.
[26] 张治河,高中一,檀润华,等.突破“卡脖子”技术的思维模式——基于TRIZ的设计[J].科研管理,2022,43(12):54-68.
[27] 李春燕.基于专利信息分析的技术生命周期判断方法[J].现代情报,2012,32(2):98-101.
[28] 张厚明. 我国新能源汽车动力电池产业发展面临的问题与建议[J]. 科学管理研究, 2018,36(6): 58-61.
[29] DENG J, BAE C, DENLINGER A, et al. Electric vehicles batteries: requirements and challenges[J]. Joule, 2020, 4(3): 511-515.
[30] MANN D L. Better technology forecasting using systematic innovation methods[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2003, 70(8): 779-795.
[31] 张文焘,张建辉,张文旭,等.基于多方法融合的需求提取模型研究[J].机械设计与研究,2021,37(1):10-15,20.