As China's strategy for independent innovation continues to deepen and the trend of "de-globalization" in the restructuring of industrial chains intensifies, the issue of "bottlenecks" in key industries is becoming increasingly serious. In the new stage of high-quality economic development in China, it is imperative to accelerate the breakthrough innovation capabilities of "Specialized, Refined, Differential, and Innovative" (SRDI) enterprises, to promote new drivers of development through technological innovation, and to achieve innovation-driven and intrinsic growth. In recent years, SRDI enterprises have made significant progress in the field of standard setting. Technical standards are gradually becoming a key guarantee to lead SRDI enterprises in breakthrough innovation, and to achieve autonomous control, security and stability in industrial and supply chains.
At present, the formulation of technical standards as an important way to integrate into the innovation network has attracted the attention of scholars. Most existing studies focus on the role of technical standards in improving information asymmetry, reducing business operational risks, and constraining technological diversity. Few literatures examine the innovative effects of technical standard formulation from the perspective of the innovation network, especially the impact on breakthrough innovation. Moreover, relevant studies are mainly based on theoretical analysis; due to the difficulty of collecting information on the technical standardization of microenterprises, there is a lack of empirical studies that systematically examine the relationship between technical standardization and breakthrough innovation of SRDI enterprises. From the perspective of innovation network, the innovation network formed by the formulation of technical standards can help SRDI enterprises achieve subversive goals through knowledge sharing and resource complementarity among innovation subjects.
Hence, in order to explore the impact of technical standardization on the breakthrough innovation of SRDI enterprises and its functioning mechanism from the perspective of innovation network, this study takes breakthrough innovation as the dependent variable and the formulation of technical standards as the independent variable, and selects enterprise size, growth rate of business income, cash flow, property rights nature, enterprise age, asset-liability ratio, and enterprise performance as control variables to establish the model. It then takes the listed SRDI enterprises announced by the state since 2019 as a sample, and the final sample obtained includes 960 SRDI listed companies, of which 668 samples have participated in the formulation of technical standards, and 292 samples have never participated in the formulation of technical standards, with a total of 7 723 observations.
It is concluded that, firstly, the formulation of technical standards can significantly promote the breakthrough innovation of SRDI enterprises. Secondly, the impact of technical standard setting is more significant in non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with stronger absorptive capacity and enterprises with higher proportion of female supervisors. Thirdly, the formulation of technical standards can promote the breakthrough innovation of SRDI enterprises by broadening the knowledge breadth and improving innovation efficiency. Fourth, the supplier’s technical standard setting has significantly improved the breakthrough innovation of SRDI enterprises. However, due to the substitutability and specificity of input, the innovation spillover effect of customer technology standard setting is not significant.
This study has made contributions in three aspects. Firstly, following the theory of innovation networks, the study explores the relationship between standard setting and breakthrough innovation in SRDI enterprises, and verify its mechanism from the perspectives of knowledge breadth and innovation efficiency, which enriches and supplements relevant research. Secondly, the study attempts to shift the present research focus from incremental innovation to breakthrough innovation, actively exploring new technological paradigms and unknown knowledge areas, and deepening existing research on SRDI enterprise innovation. Thirdly, utilizing the supplier and customer data of SRDI enterprises, the study characterizes the innovation interaction effects of upstream and downstream enterprises in the ecosystem, and by the end it proposes to pay full attention to the technological changes of suppliers and customers, actively carry out strategic learning, promote upstream and downstream integration and collaborative innovation.
Wang Aiming
,
Zhu Zhiyong
. How the Formulation of Technical Standards Promotes the Breakthrough Innovation of SRDI Enterprises: A Mechanism Test Based on Knowledge Breadth and Innovation Efficiency[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(16)
: 82
-90
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2024040585
[1] 申杰,昌忠泽.工业智能化赋能民营中小企业高质量发展——基于“专精特新”视角的研究[J].现代经济探讨,2024,43(5):52-64.
[2] PIHLAJAMAA M. Going the extra mile: managing individual motivation in radical innovation development[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2017,43(1): 48-66.
[3] 路风.论产品开发平台[J].管理世界,2018,34(8):106-129,192.
[4] MOWERY D C, ROSENBERG N. Paths of innovation: technological change in 20th century America[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2000,16(3):319-321.
[5] 胡亚男,余东华.互联网、技术路径选择与制造业高质量发展[J].财贸研究,2023,34(11):1-13.
[6] 徐细雄,林翠梁,吴林春,等.政企联动情境下中小企业的资源编排与二次创业机理研究——以江西南康家具为例[J].管理学报,2024,21(7):960-969.
[7] 吕冲冲,林冬冬,欧建猛.外部搜寻策略对突破式创新绩效影响的研究——知识特征和实际吸收能力的调节作用[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,41(3):161-172.
[8] 王伦,林润辉.研发伙伴组合多样性对突破式创新的影响研究——企业内外部环境因素的调节作用[J].软科学,2023,37(10):32-38.
[9] 李泽鑫,刘青,赵忠秀.协同创新网络与制造业企业出口国内附加值率[J].中国人民大学学报,2024,38(3):100-114.
[10] WANG C, HU Q. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance[J]. Technovation,2020,94(4):102010.
[11] 孙冰,刘晨,田胜男.社会网络视角下联盟成员合作关系对技术标准形成的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(4):21-27.
[12] WAKKE P, BLIND K, RAMEL F. The impact of participation within formal standardization on firm performance[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2016,45(3):317-330.
[13] BLIND K, LORENZ A, RAUBER J. Drivers for companies' entry into standard-setting organizations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2021,68(1):33-44.
[14] 孙慧波,姜余轲,李鹏.技术标准与制造业资源配置优化——来自中国工业企业的微观证据[J].经济学家,2024,36(4):108-117.
[15] HEINRICH T. Standard wars, tied standards, and network externality induced path dependence in the ICT sector[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2014,81(1):309-320.
[16] 祝继高,梁晓琴.企业标准化建设与成本弹性研究——来自中国A股制造业上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2022,57(12):31-50.
[17] ZHANG M, WANG Y, ZHAO Q. Does participating in the standards-setting process promote innovation? evidence from China[J]. China Economic Review, 2020, 63(1):1-49.
[18] 崔维军,孙成,吴杰,等.标准“背书”如何影响企业创新——基于组织优化视角的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2022,37(7):105-117.
[19] 周青,高延孝,刘瑶,等.面向“一带一路”企业技术标准联盟的主体互动机制研究[J].管理评论,2023,35(5):66-76,88.
[20] 张运生,何瑞芳.高科技企业技术标准竞争优势形成机理研究[J].财经理论与实践,2015,36(4):126-130.
[21] 李哲,黄静,孙健.突破式创新对分析师行为的影响——基于上市公司专利分类和引证数据的证据[J].经济管理,2021,43(5):192-208.
[22] 吴楠,赵嵩正,张小娣.企业创新网络中外部知识获取对双元性创新的影响研究[J].情报理论与实践,2015,38(5):35-41.
[23] BEERS C, ZAND F. R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014,31(2):292-312.
[24] KAFOUROS M, WANG C, PIPEROPOULOS P, et al. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: the role of region-specific institutions[J]. Research Policy, 2015,44(3):803-817.
[25] 戚聿东,杜博,叶胜然.知识产权与技术标准协同驱动数字产业创新:机理与路径[J].中国工业经济,2022,40(8):5-24.
[26] 高智林,谭文浩,毛凌翔.组织韧性与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(10):99-109.
[27] 刘小鲁.标准化与企业的R&D投入倾向:基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018,38(5):84-95.
[28] MAKRI M, HITT M A, LANE P J. Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010,31(6):602-628.
[29] 伍晨,张帆.数字并购如何影响企业突破性创新——基于知识宽度和创新效率的分析[J].财经论丛,2023,39(10):103-113.
[30] 焦豪,李宛蓉.资质认定与企业供应链伙伴数量——基于专精特新“小巨人”企业的准自然实验[J].经济学动态,2023,64(12):109-125.