Innovation and Entrepreneurship Theory

Digital Innovation: Dimension Exploration, Scale Development, and Enterprise Performance

  • Zou Yukun ,
  • Xie Weihong ,
  • Wang Zhong ,
  • Li Zhongshun
Expand
  • (1.School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology;2.School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology;3.Key Laboratory of Digital Economy and Data Governance, Guangdong University of Technology;4.Big Data Strategy Research Center, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China)

Received date: 2024-02-19

  Revised date: 2024-07-15

  Online published: 2025-08-25

Abstract

In the digital era, businesses are increasingly facing unprecedented challenges and opportunities. Digital innovation has become a crucial driver for high-quality development and maintaining a competitive edge. Despite its importance, there is a significant gap in the literature concerning the comprehensive understanding and multidimensional deconstruction of the internal processes of digital innovation. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the dimensions of digital innovation, developing a robust measurement scale, and investigating its impact on enterprise performance. The significance of this research lies in providing a deeper theoretical understanding of digital innovation and offering practical tools for businesses to enhance their innovation practices.
To achieve these objectives, the study employs grounded theory methodology, incorporating perspectives from recombination innovation, supply-demand interaction, and service-dominant logic. The interview data came from managers of four manufacturing enterprises, especially managers of information or digitalization departments. Through this rigorous process, two critical dimensions of digital innovation were identified: enterprise design recombination and user use recombination. Enterprise design recombination focuses on how enterprises reorganize resources on a large scale to enhance efficiency and innovation capacity. User use recombination emphasizes the reconfiguration of resources through use, highlighting the role of users as active participants in the innovation process. From two identified dimensions, a digital innovation scale comprising 28 items was developed. The scale underwent thorough validation processes, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), to assess its reliability and validity. The scale demonstrated high internal consistency and construct validity, making it a reliable tool for measuring various aspects of digital innovation within enterprises.
The study further employs this scale to empirically examine the impact of digital innovation on enterprise performance. Data is collected from 254 enterprises across the manufacturing industry through questionnaires. The analysis utilizes regression analysis to test the hypothesized relationships between digital innovation dimensions and enterprise performance. The results show that both enterprise design recombination and user use recombination significantly contribute to improving enterprise performance. These results indicate a strong positive correlation between digital innovation and enterprise performance, validating the predictive validity of the developed scale.The study offers several key conclusions. Firstly, the reconceptualization of digital innovation as a recombination of resources provides a nuanced understanding of its internal processes. This perspective shifts the focus from merely applying digital technologies and developing digital products to emphasizing the reconfiguration and integration of digital technologies, data, and experiential knowledge. This aligns with identified characteristics of digital innovation such as reconfigurability, data homogenization, and self-referentiality.Secondly, the study underscores the importance of the interactive roles of both enterprises and users in the innovation process, incorporating the supply-demand interaction and service-dominant logic perspectives. This highlights the role of users as active participants and collaborators in digital innovation, addressing the call for greater focus on user innovation and extending the theoretical foundation for continuous innovation in the digital context.Thirdly, the developed digital innovation scale serves as a valuable tool for subsequent empirical research, offering a robust framework for assessing the multidimensional characteristics of digital innovation. By examining the relationship between digital innovation and enterprise performance, this study validates and extends existing discussions on the positive impact of digital innovation on enterprise performance, underscoring its importance as a strategic choice for future business development.
In conclusion, this study offers a comprehensive exploration of digital innovation dimensions, develops a validated measurement scale, and demonstrates the positive impact of digital innovation on enterprise performance. The innovative perspective on digital innovation’s internal processes and the interactive roles of enterprises and users significantly enriches the theoretical discourse and provides practical guidance for businesses navigating digital transformation. This study not only enhances academic understanding but also equips practitioners with valuable tools to leverage digital innovation for sustained competitive advantage.

Cite this article

Zou Yukun , Xie Weihong , Wang Zhong , Li Zhongshun . Digital Innovation: Dimension Exploration, Scale Development, and Enterprise Performance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025 , 42(16) : 37 -48 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2024020204

References

[1] XIE W,ZOU Y,GUO H,et al. Digital innovation and core competence of manufacturing industry: moderating role of absorptive capacity[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2024, 60(1): 185-202.
[2] 谢卫红, 李忠顺, 李秀敏, 等. 数字化创新研究的知识结构与拓展方向[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(12): 184-202.
[3] LIU Y, DONG J, YING Y, et al. Status and digital innovation: a middle-status conformity perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 168: 120781.
[4] 张振刚, 户安涛, 叶宝升. 制造企业数字创新的过程机制及其对企业绩效影响研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(6): 83-97.
[5] 张振刚, 户安涛, 叶宝升. 制造企业数字创新如何促进企业绩效提升[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(11): 44-54.
[6] HANELT A, FIRK S, HILEBRANDT B, et al. Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: an empirical investigation[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2021, 30(1): 3-26.
[7] NAMBISAN S, LYYTINEN K, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
[8] HENFRIDSSON O,NANDHAKUMAR J,SCARBROUGH H, et al. Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(2): 89-100.
[9] HUND A, WAGNER H T, BEIMBORN D, et al. Digital innovation: review and novel perspective[J]. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2021, 30(4): 101695.
[10] HUANG J, HENFRIDSSON O, LIU M J, et al. Growing on steroids: rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 301-314.
[11] FLOWERS S, MEYER M. How can entrepreneurs benefit from user knowledge to create innovation in the digital services sector[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 119: 122-130.
[12] YOO Y, HENFRIDSSON O, LYYTINEN K. Research commentary-the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735.
[13] YOO Y,BOLAND R J,LYYTINEN K,et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1398-1408.
[14] 谢卫红, 林培望, 李忠顺, 等. 数字化创新:内涵特征、价值创造与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(9): 19-31.
[15] 刘洋, 董久钰, 魏江. 数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(7): 198-217,219.
[16] OPAZO-BASAEZ M,VENDRELL-HERRERO F,BUSTINZA O F. Digital service innovation: a paradigm shift in technological innovation[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2022, 33(1): 97-120.
[17] URBINATI A, CHIARONI D, CHIESA V, et al. The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis[J]. R&D Management, 2020, 50(1): 136-160.
[18] PORTER M E, HEPPELMANN J E. How smart, connected products are transforming companies[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2015, 93(10): 96-114.
[19] D′IPPOLITO B, MESSENI PETRUZZELLI A, PANNIELLO U. Archetypes of incumbents′ strategic responses to digital innovation[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2019, 20(5): 662-679.
[20] ABRELL T, PIHLAJAMAA M, KANTO L, et al. The role of users and customers in digital innovation: insights from B2B manufacturing firms[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(3): 324-335.
[21] LIU Y, DONG J, MEI L, et al. Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: an affordance perspective[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102458.
[22] DONG J Q, YANG C H. Information technology and innovation outcomes: is knowledge recombination the missing link[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2019, 28(6): 612-626.
[23] NASIRI M, SAUNILA M, UKKO J, et al. Shaping digital innovation via digital-related capabilities[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2023, 25(3): 1063-1080.
[24] CHEN D Q, ZHANG Y, XIAO J, et al. Making digital innovation happen: a chief information officer issue selling perspective[J]. Information Systems Research, 2021, 32(3): 987-1008.
[25] 刘思慧, 李文, 俞荣建, 等. 商业模式创新和数字赋能对数字化转型的驱动机制研究——基于TJ-QCA的案例分析[J]. 管理评论, 2023, 35(8): 342-352.
[26] HILBOLLING S, BERENDS H, DEKEN F, et al. Complementors as connectors: managing open innovation around digital product platforms[J]. R&D Management, 2020, 50(1): 18-30.
[27] 程豹, 于晓彤, 蒋建武. 持续导向型人力资源管理量表开发与验证研究[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(4): 534-544.
[28] 邵云飞, 范波, 杨雪程. 突破性创新视角下的互补性资产与企业绩效关系研究[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(2): 3-15.
[29] 李忆, 司有和. 知识管理战略、创新与绩效的关系——基于企业战略的分析[J]. 科研管理, 2009, 30(3): 154-165.
Outlines

/