As technology convergence among strategic emerging industries deepens, the boundaries among technologies are increasingly blurred and redefined. Understanding the interconnections between technologies and grasping the structural dynamics and innovative trends within technology clusters from a global perspective are of significant value for efficiently allocating technological resources and enhancing innovation output. Currently, the studies related to technology convergence and innovation situation assessment mostly use small-sample patent data from specific industries or specific regions, which may lead to biased results. However, due to the difficulty of data acquisition and analysis, few scholars have conducted relevant research on technology integration and innovation situation assessment based on global patent big data. The importance of relevant research data in supporting the formulation of macro-innovation guidance policies is self-evident.
Therefore, this study utilizes global PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) big data to develop models for identifying key core technology clusters and assessing innovation trends. It first collects 4 611 149 PCT applications, 14 887 452 records of IPC categories, and 23 961 143 PCT citations.The RIT index is constructed to classify all technology domains into four technology categories, and this paper unfolds along two logical lines: "patent big data + technology convergence + technology clusters" and "PCT patents + RIT index + h-strength index." In details, IPC co-occurrence relationships of all domains are extracted to construct a global technology convergence network map; the core structure of the network map is extracted by using h-strength; and the results are carefully interpreted by combining the algorithmic identification of the network communities with the interpretation of technical experts. A total of 2 mega, 8 large, 30 medium and 34 smaller-sized key technology communities are identified in this study for global and domain-wide.
This research framework aims to provide data support for understanding global technological innovation hotspots and assisting in the formulation of macro-industrial innovation policies. In terms of theoretical innovation, this paper integrates three research topics: innovation measurement, technology convergence, and technology clusters. For instance, in the analysis of IPC co-occurrence network graphs, the paper combines the classification of key technology innovation trends with the analysis of the characteristics of key technology convergence clusters.
According to a new indicator, the relative impact of technology (RIT), its two-dimensional scatter chart and IPC co-occurrence core network, 76 core technology integration communities around the world and in all fields are identified, and their innovation trends are evaluated. The study finds that pharmaceuticals and the transmission of digital information and wireless communication networks are the main driving forces for global technological innovation. Optical elements, systems, and apparatus show strong characteristics on the whole, and semiconductor devices, new energy vehicles and autonomous driving present four different innovation situations, namely strong, emerging, recessionary and sleeping characteristics, which present obvious technological iteration. In addition, technical fields such as medium-scale catalysts, layered products, additive manufacturing, copolymers and copolymerization processes, semipermeable membranes and preparation, and surface liquid coatings also show distinctive characteristics.
In the conclusion section, the paper emphasizes technical interpretations, along with policy recommendations and future research prospects. In subsequent studies, it is suggested to systematically compare China's technological development context with international mainstream trends based on current technology community divisions. This would help clarify China's structural characteristics and directions of innovation, analyze China's technological advantages and disparities, identify potential technological development risks, and propose innovative governance strategies for China's cutting-edge technologies. Moreover, the paper provides policy suggestions for enhancing China's discourse power in global innovation strength evaluation and integrating into the global innovation ecosystem. Overall, this study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of global technology convergence and innovation dynamics, offering valuable insights for policymakers and researchers alike.As for the research deficiencies: on the one hand, h-strength is used to intercept the core network mapping of co-occurring relationships among IPCs, which makes isolated and smaller technologies excluded from the core network; on the other hand, the data sources and analysis indicators of this study are more limited, mainly relying on PCT patents, IPC classification numbers and citation indicators. Future research could incorporate more diverse data sources and analytical indicators, such as tripartite patent datasets, natural language processing models, and non-patent citations.
Sun Minghan
,
Wei Xueying
,
Zhu Xiuzhu
. Key Technology Identification and Model Construction ofInnovation Situation Assessment: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Global PCT Applications[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(12)
: 129
-139
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2024010280
[1] ACS Z J, ANSELIN L, VARGA A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(7): 1069-1085.
[2] 唐玉洁,李阳.基于时序指数随机图模型的共性技术涌现动力机制研究——以超级电容器绿色储能技术为例[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(4):23-32.
[3] OECD. Trends in water-related technological innovation [EB/OL].(2020-04-07)[2023-11-01].https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/821c01f2-en.
[4] OECD. Measuring environmental innovation using patent data[EB/OL]. (2015-06-26)[2023-11-01]. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/5js009kf48xw-en.
[5] XUAN Y, ZHANG S, LI X, et al. Identify cross-country knowledge flow and innovation trajectory: insights from patent citation network analysis of 5G technology[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2023,36(10):2997-3019.
[6] 孙明汉, 郭梦园, 朱秀珠. 基于专利图谱的全球船舶领域创新前沿探测研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2023, 39(3): 73-81.
[7] JIANG Y, XU J, WANG G. Trade in green patents: how do green technologies flow in China[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer,2024,49:823-856.
[8] 王格格,刘树林.国际专利分类号间的知识流动与技术间知识溢出测度——基于中国发明授权专利数据[J].情报学报,2020,39(11):1162-1170.
[9] 李姝影, 方曙. 测度技术融合与趋势的数据分析方法研究进展[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 38(7): 2-12.
[10] 娄岩, 赵培培, 黄鲁成. 基于专利共类的无人机技术融合趋势研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(11): 68-75,81.
[11] KIM K. Impact of firms′ cooperative innovation strategy on technological convergence performance: the case of Korea′s ICT industry[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(9): 1601.
[12] YUN J, GEUM Y. Analysing the dynamics of technological convergence using a co-classification approach: a case of healthcare services[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2019, 31(12): 1412-1429.
[13] WILFRED DOLFSMA, LOET LEYDESDORFF. Innovation systems as patent networks: the Netherlands, India and nanotech[J].Innovation, 2011,13(3):311-326.
[14] HUANG Y, ZHU D H, QIAN Y, et al. A hybrid method to trace technology evolution pathways: a case study of 3D printing[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111(1): 185-204.
[15] BRUCK P, RTHY I, SZENTE J, et al. Recognition of emerging technology trends: class-selective study of citations in the US patent citation network[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107: 1465-1475.
[16] ZHANG B, YU X, ZHANG R. Emerging technology identification based on a dynamic framework: a lifecycle evolution perspective[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2024, 36(2): 378-392.
[17] KELLEY D J, ALI A, ZAHRA S A. Where do breakthroughs come from? characteristics of high-potential inventions[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(6): 1212-1226.
[18] WIPO. Global innovation index 2022 what is the future of innovation driven growth[EB/OL].(2022-09-29)[2023-11-01].https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2022/.
[19] 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院. 技术焦点TOP100基本信息表[EB/OL]. (2023-01-18)[2023-11-01].http://www.casisd.cn/ttxw1/zlyjytt/202301/P020230118343856 071936.pdf.
[20] DE RASSENFOSSE G, DERNIS H, GUELLEC D, et al. The worldwide count of priority patents: a new indicator of inventive activity[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(3): 720-737.
[21] KUMAR R, TRIPATHI R C, TIWARI M D. A case study of impact of patenting in the current developing economies in Asia[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88(2): 575-587.
[22] BARRAGAN-OCANA A, GOMEZ-VIQUEZ H, MERRITT H, et al. Promotion of technological development and determination of or biotechnology trends in five selected Latin American countries: an analysis based on PCT patent applications[J]. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2019, 37: 41-46.
[23] 王小梅,韩涛,李国鹏,等. 科学结构图谱2017[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2017.
[24] MOED H F, LUWEL M, HOUBEN J A, et al. The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980's and early 1990's[J]. Scientometrics, 1998, 43(2): 231-255.
[25] LUNDBERG J.Lifting the crown-citation z-score[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(2): 145-154.
[26] OPTHOF T, LEYDESDORFF L. Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(3): 423-430.
[27] 宋艳辉, 罗力, 武夷山. 网络环境下新闻传播学文献老化规律研究[J]. 中国出版, 2016,39(11): 33-36.
[28] 赵星,李盛庆,叶鹰,等. H型指数和H型测度研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2018.
[29] ZHAO S X, ZHANG P L, LI J, et al. Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(5): 984-994.
[30] OECD. Intellectual property (IP) statistics and analysis [EB/OL]. (2023-09-14)[2023-09-14]. https://www.oecd.org/sti/intellectual-property-statistics-and-analysis.htm.