New quality productive forces are the productivity driven by future technological innovation. Its formation and development are the result of the continuous impact of many emerging technologies like big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. In the digital economy era, data serves as a new production factor that can be applied across various scenarios and reused by multiple entities, enhancing the input-output efficiency of other production factors. It is becoming a powerful driving force for the formation of new quality productive forces. As crucial micro-entities within the economic system, enterprises are not only producers of goods and services, but also demanders of production factors. In modern enterprises, the value form of data elements is data resources. Ultimately, social productivity manifests its powerful dynamism and effectiveness through various types of enterprises. Therefore, it is necessary to explore how data resources empower the development of enterprises new quality productive forces from the perspective of micro-enterprises.
This paper conducts an analysis on three levels. Firstly, this paper systematically explains the connotations of productive forces, new quality productive forces and enterprise new quality productive forces, as well as analyzes the essence, attributes, and functional forms of data resources. Secondly, by exploring the substitution effect, synergy effect, innovation effect, and connection effect of data resources, this paper analyzes how these effects cultivate new-quality laborers, generate new-quality labor materials, and expand new-quality labor objects, so as to construct a theoretical logic framework for data resources to empower the development of enterprises new quality productive forces. Finally, starting from the three dimensions of cultivating new-quality laborers, generating new-quality labor materials, and expanding new-quality labor objects, this paper proposes practical constraints and enhancement paths for data resources to empower the development of enterprise new quality productive forces.
This paper contributes to promoting research on new quality productive forces from a micro-enterprise level and data element perspective, further enriching the relevant research on Marxist productivity theory and Xi Jinping's theoretical system of economic thought. This paper also aids in promoting the cultivation and implementation of new quality productive forces, providing theoretical research references for guiding enterprises to unleash the data multiplier effect and continuously advance new quality productive forces development.
The main research conclusions are threefold. Firstly, in terms of theoretical logic, data resources drive the development of enterprises new quality productive forces by cultivating new-quality laborers, promoting new-quality labor materials, and expanding new-quality labor objects. The underlying logic includes substitution effect, synergy effect, innovation effect, and connection effect. In the aspect of cultivating new-quality laborers, data resources drive high-quality workers to replace low-skilled workers, enhance employees' competencies, assist enterprises in utilizing various digital-intelligent workers, and help form value and emotional connections between enterprises and high-skilled workers. In the aspect of generating new-quality labor materials, data resources drive highly data-related labor materials to replace traditional labor materials, promote the intelligentization and greenization of traditional labor materials,, foster innovative development of labor materials, and effectively link internal and external labor materials. In the aspect of expanding new-quality labor objects, data resources drive new labor objects to replace traditional labor objects, promote intelligent use and green improvements, foster innovative development of labor materials, and effectively connect internal and external labor objects. Secondly, practical challenges hinder the empowerment of these new productive forces. These include a mismatch in the supply and demand for big data professionals, difficulty in improving workers' data literacy, integrating diverse data sources efficiently, and planning precise data infrastructure. There are also issues with unclear data ownership and the ineffective integration of data resources with application scenarios. Thirdly, in terms of improvement paths, to address challenges of cultivating new-quality laborers, efforts should focus on enhancing big data talent training and improving data literacy among general workers. To overcome constraints in generating new-quality labor materials, methods for integrating multi-source heterogeneous data should be explored, and enterprise-specific data infrastructure development should be promoted. To resolve limitations on expanding new-quality labor objects, efforts should focus on clarifying data ownership and enriching data resource application scenarios.
Yuan Zeming
,
Li Meng
,
Li Yuanzhen
. Data Resources Empowering the Development of Enterprise New Quality Productive Forces: Theoretical Logic, Practical Constraints and Improvement Paths[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(11)
: 22
-31
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.L2024XZ570
[1] 尹志超. 深化改革激发微观主体活力[N].人民日报,2024-07-10(10).
[2] 任保平.生产力现代化转型形成新质生产力的逻辑[J].经济研究,2024,59(3):12-19.
[3] 廖才茂. 现代企业生产力概论[M]. 上海:上海财经大学出版社, 1997.
[4] 马昀,卫兴华.用唯物史观科学把握生产力的历史作用[J].中国社会科学, 2013,34(11): 46-64,203.
[5] 黄群慧,盛方富.新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J].改革, 2024,37(2):15-24.
[6] 肖涛.生产力研究的方向——兼评《现代企业生产力概论》[J].当代财经,1998,19(4):17-18.
[7] 姜奇平.新质生产力:核心要素与逻辑结构[J].探索与争鸣,2024,40(1):132-141,179-180.
[8] VOICH D,WREN D. Principles of management: resources and systems[M]. New York: Ronald Press Company, 1968.
[9] LEVITIN A V, REDMAN T C. Data as a resource:properties, implications and prescriptions[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1998, 40(1): 89-101.
[10] BARNEY J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management,1991,17(1):99-120.
[11] 蔡继明, 刘媛, 高宏, 等. 数据要素参与价值创造的途径——基于广义价值论的一般均衡分析[J].管理世界,2022,38(7):108-121.
[12] 谢康,夏正豪,肖静华.大数据成为现实生产要素的企业实现机制:产品创新视角[J].中国工业经济,2020,38(5):42-60.
[13] WU L, HITT L, LOU B. Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(5): 2017-2039.
[14] 李晓梅,刘姗姗.数据要素赋能企业供应链韧性:理论机制与实证检验[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(5):1-11.
[15] 金骋路,陈荣达.数据要素价值化及其衍生的金融属性:形成逻辑与未来挑战[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(7):69-89.
[16] PERRONS R K, JENSEN J W. Data as an asset: what the oil and gas sector can learn from other industries about "Big Data"[J]. Energy Policy, 2015, 81: 117-121.
[17] LIU D, CHEN S, CHOU T. Resource fit in digital transformation: lessons learned from the CBC Bank global e-banking project[J]. Management Decision, 2011, 49(10): 1728-1742.
[18] ZHANG X, CHU Z, REN L, et al. Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: the role of organizational learning[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 186: 122114.
[19] KAMBLE S S, GUNASEKARAN A. Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: a review and framework for implementation[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58(1): 65-86.
[20] BOTOSAN C A. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital[J].The Accounting Review,1997,72(2):114-127.
[21] GOMPERS P A, MUKHARLYAMOV V, XUAN Y H. The cost of friendship[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2016,119(3):626-644.
[22] 洪银兴. 用习近平经济思想指导新的生产力理论研究[N].人民日报,2024-04-09(09).
[23] RACCUGLIA P, ELBERT K C, ADLER P D F, et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments[J]. Nature, 2016, 533(7601): 73-76.
[24] VAN D B T, VAN V A F. Governance of big data collaborations: how to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 129: 330-338.
[25] 孟浩,张美莎.人工智能如何影响劳动力就业需求——来自中国企业层面的经验证据[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2021,41(5):65-73,93.
[26] PARK Y K, MITHAS S. Organized complexity of digital business strategy: a configurational perspective[J]. Mis Quarterly, 2020, 44(1):85-127.
[27] 尹西明,陈劲,王冠.场景驱动:面向新质生产力的数据要素市场化配置新机制[J].社会科学辑刊,2024,46(3):178-188.