Patents are the most effective carriers of technical information and have become key assets in the innovation competition between enterprises and countries. Universities are a major focus area for the National Intellectual Property Administration's crackdown on "abnormal" patents. While most university patents in China tend to be shelved after the grant of patent rights, and the investment in university scientific research resources has not produced practical application value, resulting in serious waste. Both the crackdown on abnormal patents and the transformation and utilization of patents are directly related to patent quality. Thus, it is urgent to evaluate the quality of university patents. However, it is difficult to assess the quality of patents manually through human means amidst millions of patent applications. Patent quality changes with market changes and technological development, so the dynamic nature of patent quality assessment can reflect the latest changes in the market and technology in a timely manner, which can improve the accuracy of patent assessment. Therefore, it is particularly important to seek a dynamic assessment method that is both accurate and generalizable to judge the quality of patents.
In order to achieve accurate assessment of the quality of announced patents, this study constructs a dynamic patent quality assessment model based on deep learning. The model takes into account both the static and dynamic characteristics of patents, including multiple indicators in legal, market, and technological aspects, making the assessment results more comprehensive and objective. In terms of static assessment, indicators include the remaining validity period of the patent right, the number of claims, and the number of examples, which reflect the basic attributes and legal value of the patent. By constructing a static assessment quality interval, the quality status of the patent is clarified at the static level. In terms of dynamic assessment, the market transaction situation and technological development trends of similar patents are considered, including indicators such as average monthly transaction price, average monthly transfer price, transaction volume, and technical feature indicators. These indicators help capture the performance and technological influence of patents in the market, thereby better reflecting the dynamic quality of patents. By integrating static and dynamic assessments, an open deep learning assessment model is constructed to provide the corresponding quality assessment interval according to the classification numbers. This not only improves assessment efficiency but also provides strong data support for the transformation and application of patents.
Through empirical analysis, this study uses the announcement patent data from the National Intellectual Property Administration to select 1 000 samples for the extraction of static assessment quality intervals and dynamic assessment quality intervals. By establishing distribution interval charts for static and dynamic assessments and using specific screening methods, high and low screening intervals are determined, and corresponding assessment quality intervals are calculated. On this basis, the results of static and dynamic assessments are integrated to construct a deep learning assessment model for accurately assessing the quality of announced patents. The model considers multi-dimensional factors such as the technical level of patents, degree of innovation, and market demand, and can output three levels of assessment grade signals: normal, low, and high. It also uses a redirection mechanism for further analysis of abnormal or borderline assessment results. In addition, the model's training used a BP neural network, including an input layer, a hidden layer, and an output layer, where the hidden layer was designed with two intermediate layers and three neuron units to enhance the model's processing capability and precision. With continuously updated patent data, the model can learn and adjust itself to improve the accuracy and reliability of the assessment.
The dynamic patent quality assessment model based on deep learning proposed in this study is not only innovative in theory but also has high practical application value. It provides a new perspective and method for patent assessment, and helps to promote the effective transformation and rational use of patents. Future research can further optimize the model structure and explore more valuable assessment indicators to improve the model's assessment precision and practicality.
[1] 来音,李婉丽,李峥峰,等.深度注意力机制下的高校专利价值评估方法——基于历史转化特征锚定效应视角[J].情报杂志,2023,42(8):200-207.
[2] 侯剑华,屠一云.基于专利计量的国家间技术竞争情报分析——以智能手机技术为例[J]. 现代情报,2014,34(10):119-123,129.
[3] 谢伟峰,文家春,袁晓东.非正常申请专利行为实证研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2022,42(5):179-185.
[4] 周艳丽,李庆,葛翔宇.一类专利权价值的动态实物期权定价方法[J].数理统计与管理,2019,38(5):940-950.
[5] 詹烨.基于ANP的市场法的专利权质押融资价值评估研究[D]. 成都:西南财经大学,2015.
[6] 孙胜祥,杨成斌,魏华.成本法在专利价值分析中的应用研究[J]. 海军工程大学学报(综合版),2020,17(1):69-73.
[7] 苏健美.基于收益法的专利权价值评估研究[D]. 昆明:云南大学,2014.
[8] 马治国,谢伟,张磊.技术、法律、市场三维视角下我国药品高价值专利评估体系构建研究[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,52(5):120-130.
[9] CHEN X,GAO F,WANG J, et al. Patent valuation: an improved method based on convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,2020,38(3): 2379-2386.
[10] WANG L,CHEN S,ZHOU W, et al. A patent value evaluation method based on recurrent neural network[C].International Conference on Brain Informatics. Springer,Cham,2018: 333-342.
[11] HUANG T,YAN M,MENG Y, et al. Patent value prediction based on deep learning[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2019,123: 422-432.
[12] 刘澄,雷秋原,张楠,等.基于BP神经网络的专利价值评估方法及其应用研究[J]. 情报杂志,2021,40(12): 195-202.
[13] 刘妍.专利价值评估研究综述与趋势展望[J].图书情报工作,2022,66(15):127-139.
[14] 张希,胡元佳.非市场基准的专利价值评估方法的理论基础、实证研究和挑战[J].软科学, 2010, 24(9):142-144.
[15] 刘子辰,李小娟,韦伟.基于循环神经网络的专利价格自动评估[J].计算机应用,2021,41(9):2532-2538.
[16] 林弘杰.基于深度学习的专利价值评估方法研究[D].合肥:中国科学技术大学,2018.
[17] 赵雪峰,胡瑾瑾,吴德林,等. 一种基于特征拼接、标签迁移及深度学习组合的专利价值评估方法[J]. 情报学报,2023,42(6):663-680.
[18] 万小丽.专利质量指标研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009.
[19] 郭青,戚湧,高盼军.基于技术、法律和经济三位一体的专利质量评价及应用研究[J]. 中国发明与专利,2021,18(1):21-29.
[20] WU M C.Antecedents of patent value using exchange option models: evidence from a panel data analysis[J].Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(1):81-86.
[21] 邓洁,张彩铃,李源信.高校专利质量对专利转化的影响效应研究——基于“双一流”高校的实证研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(10):200-207.
[22] 杨思思,戴磊,郝屹.专利经济价值度通用评估方法研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(1):52-60.
[23] 王颖特. 基于双向门控循环单元注意力机制的高校专利质量评估方法[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2022.
[24] 马晓雅.基于GRU-Attention机制的高校发明专利质量评估研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2020.
[25] 李欣,范明姐,黄鲁成.基于机器学习的专利质量评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(24):116-124.
[26] 付振康,王翔,罗启基,等.基于机器学习的高校专利质量评价实证研究——以山东省高校为例[J].中国发明与专利,2021,18(11):10-20.
[27] LIWEI Z,TONGTONG Z,YUTAO L, et al.Research on patent quality evaluation based on rough set and cloud model[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2024,235:121057.
[28] JHENG-LONG WU, PEI-CHANN CHANG, CHENG-CHIN TSAO, et al.A patent quality analysis and classification system using self-organizing maps with support vector machine[J].Applied Soft Computing,2016,41:305-316.
[29] HIGHAM K,GAETAN DE RASSENFOSSE, JAFFE A B.Patent quality: towards a systematic framework for analysis and measurement[J].Research Policy, 2021, 50(4):104215.
[30] 张杰,孙超,翟东升,等.基于诉讼专利的专利质量评价方法研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(5):138-146.
[31] LANJOUW O J,SCHANKERMAN M.Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J].The Economic Journal,2004,114(495):441-465.
[32] 蔡鸿宇,王向锋,徐宗煌,等.高价值专利有何特征——基于模糊集定性比较分析的组态效应研究[J].情报科学,2024,42(4):167-174,183.