In the digital era, the development of virtual agglomeration has enabled enterprises to become organizations that are not constrained by geographic boundaries, characterized by integration and synergy. While as data becomes a new production factor, organizations need to develop digitalization capabilities to harness the value of data elements, improve the level of synergy and operational efficiency, and adapt to the development trend of virtual agglomeration.This adaptation is essential for securing new spaces for growth and gaining competitive advantages. Against this backdrop, this study analyzes digitalization capabilities from the perspective of virtual agglomeration, including the formation, structure, and influence of digitalization capabilities in order to provide a systematic research model.
Firstly, this study defines the concept of organizational digitalization capability from the perspective of virtual agglomeration. Most of the research on digitalization capability in the literature focus on individual organizations at the micro level, and it is less likely to put digitalization capability into the organization's virtual agglomeration to study, and it has not formed a systematic system. This research defines digitalization capability as an organizational capability system that emerges from the application of digital technology to integrate the internal and external capabilities of an organization and create value. The aim is to optimize business synergy and resource sharing of interenterprise and obtain the scale effects of resources that virtual agglomeration can provide.
Secondly, this study discusses how organizations within virtual agglomerations form digitalization capabilities and what conditions and mechanisms are involved in their development. Considering the characteristics of virtualization and agglomeration, the analysis of digitalization capability formation is categorized based on virtual and agglomeration orientations. On the virtual orientation side, effectively linking organizations across different geographic spaces to achieve agglomeration requires the use of digital technology; the abundance of resources can exponentially enhance organizational capabilities in the virtual space; virtualization has led to a fragmented marketplace, necessitating that organizations strengthen their ability to adapt to market changes. Thus, the conditions for the formation of digitalization capabilities are driven by technology, resource, and market.On the agglomeration orientation side, inter-organizational links are needed to form agglomerations, and an efficient link is a fundamental requirement for the formation of digitalization capabilities; advantaged organizations can assist disadvantaged organizations by coordinating agglomeration activities to promote this capability; inter-organizational cultural distance makes cooperation unstable, and there is a need to build a culture of agglomeration and enhance trust. Therefore, the conditions for the formation of digitalization capabilities includes linkage, empowerment, and cultural factors.
Next, it explores and analyzes the structure of organizational digitalization capability in virtual agglomeration, and reviews the development of measurement methods. Because of the different research contexts and target objects, the structure of digitalization capabilities is divided into different levels. Virtual agglomeration emphasizes the interconnection between organizations, and these organizations formed can be conceptualized as a network organization composed of nodes and links, and the measurement of digitalization capabilities should focus on these two aspects. Additionally, considering integration, platform, and smart attributes is crucial. This study outlines key digitalization capability measurement approaches: using established scales for preliminary assessment, identifying substitute objective indicators, and employing grounded theory methods. However, these measurement methods are not accurate,highlighting a need for innovative measurement techniques tailored to virtual agglomeration contexts.
Finally, the influence of digitalization capabilities on organizations and the mechanisms of action are summarized. This study concludes that the direct influence of digitalization capability on agglomeration is manifested in agglomeration upgrading. Specifically, the influence of digitalization capability on agglomeration upgrading is reflected in the products, processes, and models. In addition, the analysis of the influence mechanism process shows that the agglomeration environment plays a moderating mechanism in the aftereffect of digitalization capability on agglomeration; while the dynamic capability plays a mediating mechanism in the after-effect of digitalization capability on agglomeration. This study broadens the theoretical framework for understanding organizational digitalization capabilities. It offers a more nuanced comprehension of the development, composition, and post-implementation dynamics of digitalization capabilities. Furthermore, it furnishes novel research insights and directions, enhancing the execution of digitalization capability initiatives within virtual agglomeration.
[1] 王如玉,梁琦,李广乾.虚拟集聚:新一代信息技术与实体经济深度融合的空间组织新形态[J].管理世界,2018,34(2):13-21.
[2] 田霖,张仕杰.我国虚拟集聚水平测度、空间差异与收敛性研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,53(7):75-97.
[3] ANNARELLI A, BATTISTELLA C, NONINO F, et al. Literature review on digitalization capabilities: co-citation analysis of antecedents, conceptualization and consequences[J]. Technological for Ecasting and Social Change, 2021, 166(3):1-22.
[4] MUGGE P, ABBU H, MICHAELIS T L, et al. Patterns of digitization: a practical guide to digital transformation[J]. Research-technology Management, 2020, 63(2):27-35.
〖LL〗[5] CHAKRABARTY S. Value creation in industrial clusters: the strategic nature of relationships with stakeholders and the policy environment[J]. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2020, 13(4):535-550.
[6] BLASCO-ARCAS L, ALEXANDER M, SORHAMMAR D, et al. Organizing actor engagement: a platform perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 118:74-85.
[7] VERHOEF P C, BROEKHUIZENA T, BARTB Y A, et al. Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 122(1):889-901.
[8] BELTAGUI A, ROSLI A, CANDI M. Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: the disruptive impacts of 3d printing[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(1):1-16.
[9] MATARAZZO M, PENCO L, PROFUMO G, et al. Digital transformation and customer value creation in made in Italy SMEs: a dynamic capabilities perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 123:642-656.
[10] WARNER K, WAEGER M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3):326-349.
[11] 黄璜,谢思娴,姚清晨,等.数字化赋能治理协同:数字政府建设的“下一步行动”[J].电子政务,2022,19(4):2-27.
[12] HENFRIDSSON O, NANDHAKUMAR J, SCARBROUGH H, et al. Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization, 2018,28(2):89-100.
[13] WESSEL L, BAIYERE A, OLOGEANU-TADDEI R, et al. Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2020, 22(1):1-58.
[14] LOON M, OTAYE-EBEDE L, STEWART J, et al. Thriving in the new normal: the HR micro foundations of capabilities for business model innovation: an integrated literature review[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2020, 57(3):698-726.
[15] ZHANG R, YANG Y, WANG W. Research on document digitization processing technology[J]. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2020, 309:02014.
[16] 李腾,孙国强,崔格格.数字产业化与产业数字化:双向联动关系、产业网络特征与数字经济发展[J].产业经济研究,2021,20(5):54-68.
[17] COREYNEN W,VANDERSTRAETEN J,WITTELOOSTUIJN A V,et al. What drives product-service integration? an abductive study of decision-makers' motives and value strategies[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 117:189-200.
[18] LEIPZIG T V, GAMP M, MANZ D, et al. Initialising customer-orientated digital transformation in enterprises[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, 8:517-524.
[19] 张睿倩,刘昊倬,谢一臻,等.虚拟集聚型网络关系、制度逻辑差异与数字赋能型企业成长——基于云计算企业的研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(8):92-101.
[20] CHATTERJEE S, MOODY G D, LOWRY P B, et al. Information technology and organizational innovation: harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(1):101595.
[21] MARFO J S. A Typology of big data capabilities from resources to dynamic capabilities. evidence from a Ghanaian health insurance firm[C]. Americas Conference on Information Systems,2017.
[22] 吉峰,贾学迪,林婷婷.制造企业数字化能力的概念及其结构维度——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(5):151-166.
[23] MIRZABEIKI V, SAGHIRI S S. From ambition to action: how to achieve integration in omni-channel[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020,110:1-11.
[24] HANELT A, BOHNSACK R, MARZ D, et al. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2020, 58(5): 1159-1197.
[25] GOLDFARB A, TUCKER C. Digital economics[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2019, 57(1):3-43.
[26] WU L, LOU B, HITT L. Data analytics supports decentralized innovation[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65(10):4863-4877.
[27] 范合君,吴婷.新型数字基础设施、数字化能力与全要素生产率[J].经济与管理研究,2022,43(1):3-22.
[28] 张昊,刘德佳.数字化发展对先进制造企业服务创新的影响研究——基于企业动态能力视角[J].中国软科学,2023,38(3):150-161.
[29] MIKALEF P, KROGSTIE J, PAPPAS I O, et al. Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: the mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(2):103169.
[30] BRADLOW E T, GANGWAR M, KOPALLE P, et al. The role of big data and predictive analytics in retailing[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2017, 93(1):79-95.