As China has entered a new era of high-quality development, it has focused on optimizing and upgrading the economic structure, enhancing innovation capabilities, and ensuring the sustainable development of environmental resources. The high-quality development of China's economy and green innovation by enterprises are the core driving forces, and reasonable guidance of government policies is also essential. Green innovation in enterprises cannot do without the support and guidance of fiscal and tax policies. The impact of fiscal and tax policies and institutional adjustments will continue to be transmitted to other areas at the macro level. The macro level of tax burden and the pattern of tax power allocation will have a linkage effect on the industrial system, economic growth, and other aspects, causing greater waves in economic and social development. The government systems of countries around the world are generally composed of several levels, and fiscal and tax policies can come from different levels of government. The important goal of the central government is to achieve coordinated economic development among various regions through the rational allocation of financial power, ultimately promoting the healthy and sustainable development of the entire national economy. Therefore, the financial relationship between governments, especially between the central government and local governments, has always been an important topic of high concern for government departments and research fields.
At present, most of the existing literature studies the impact of government behavior on corporate innovation from the perspectives of tax burden, fiscal decentralization, or intergovernmental competition. Value-added tax is currently the largest tax in China, and a series of reforms aimed at value-added tax are the top priority of China's financial system reform. According to the relevant theories and research results of fiscal decentralization, the tax sharing incentives generated by the value-added tax sharing reform will affect local government behavior and corporate strategic choices, ultimately improving the green innovation performance of enterprises. So, has China's value-added tax sharing reform, which began in 2016, played an important role in improving the performance of green innovation in enterprises? What are its mechanisms and influencing factors? What measures do central and local governments need to take to make the value-added tax sharing reform play its due role in green innovation? These issues are worth conducting empirical data analysis and exploration under the guidance of theories and research results related to fiscal decentralization.
Therefore,this study attempts to explore the impact of tax sharing on the green innovation performance of enterprises from the perspective of value-added tax. The reasonable allocation of fiscal power can motivate local governments and enterprises to improve green innovation performance, and promote the smooth transformation and upgrading of the entire national economy. The value-added tax sharing reform, as an important measure of China's fiscal decentralization reform, is bound to have an impact on the green innovation performance of enterprises. In order to verify this conclusion and analyze its mechanism and influencing factors, this study conducts empirical analysis using data from listed companies in manufacturing from 2012 to 2021 and the intensity DID model. The results show that (1) the value-added tax sharing reform has significantly improved the green innovation performance of enterprises; (2) the competition of local government fiscal expenditure and the level of corporate credit play an important intermediary role in it; and (3) the institutional environment plays a significant positive moderating role. Heterogeneity analysis confirms that the reform of value-added tax sharing has a more significant impact on the eastern region and state-owned enterprises.
With fiscal expenditure competition and corporate credit level as mediating variables and the institutional environment as moderating variables, this study analyzes tax sharing and corporate green innovation performance within the same research framework. The marginal contribution of this article mainly lies in the exploration of the improvement path of the green innovation performance of enterprises from the perspective of value-added tax sharing reform by using microdata and empirical methods to empirically test the mechanism and environment of action. This provides empirical evidence and ideas for optimizing fiscal decentralization reform, effectively stimulating the vitality of green innovation in enterprises, and promoting economic transformation and upgrading.
Wang Yinmei
,
Wu Xuanxi
,
Zhang Xinyue
. The Impact of VAT Sharing on the Green Innovation Performance of Enterprises:Empirical Evidence Based on Listed Manufacturing Companies[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(4)
: 67
-77
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023100867
[1] 席鹏辉,梁若冰,谢贞发.税收分成调整、财政压力与工业污染[J].世界经济,2017,40(10):170-192.
[2] 宋丽颖,张安钦,温军.税收分成与经济发展方式转变:机制分析和经验证据[J].财政研究,2022,43(7):3-15.
[3] JIANG SHAN-SHAN,LI JING-MEI. Do political promotion incentive and fiscal incentive of local governments matter for the marine environmental pollution? evidence from China′s coastal areas[J]. Marine Policy,2021,128:104505.
[4] 陈斌,李拓.财政分权和环境规制促进了中国绿色技术创新吗[J].统计研究,2020,37(6):27-39.
[5] LIU SHENG,MAI QING,CHEN XIUYING. The province-managing-county reform and green innovation of enterprises: evidence from the quasi-natural experiment[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2022,29(59):88823-88838.
[6] 李香菊,贺娜.地区竞争下环境税对企业绿色技术创新的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(9):73-81.
[7] 吕冰洋.政府间税收分权的配置选择和财政影响[J].经济研究,2009,44(6):16-27.
[8] ZHANG BOCHEN,ZHAO SHUKUAN,FAN XUEYUAN,et al. Corrigendum: green supply chain integration, supply chain agility and green innovation performance: evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science,2022,10:1128787.
[9] MARTIN MEURERS,JOHANNES MOENIUS. Market potential and fiscal incentives influence firms′ location decisions: evidence from U.S. counties[J].Economic Development Quarterly,2020,34(2):126-139.
[10] CAMILA GRAMKOW,ANNELA ANGER-KRAAVI. Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? the case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors[J]. Climate Policy,2018,18(2):246-257.
[11] 李建军,吴懿.税收分成、财政激励与制造业企业活力——来自“增值税分成”改革的证据[J].财贸经济,2021,42(9):5-19.
[12] 王燕武,王俊海.地方政府行为与地区产业结构趋同的理论及实证分析[J].南开经济研究,2009,25(4):33-49.
[13] 詹新宇,刘文彬.税收分成对经济增长目标管理的激励效应[J].税务研究,2021,37(4):128-133.
[14] HALIMATUSSADIAH ALIN,KURNIAWAN ROBI,FARAH MITA ARIA,et al. The impact of fiscal incentives on the feasibility of solar photovoltaic and wind electricity generation projects: the case of Indonesia[J].Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems,2023,11(1):1-16.
[15] 王馨,王营.绿色信贷政策增进绿色创新研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(6):173-188,11.
[16] 祝继高,岳衡,饶品贵.地方政府财政压力与银行信贷资源配置效率——基于我国城市商业银行的研究证据[J].金融研究,2020,63(1):88-109.
[17] 宋春霞,薛月.不同风险特征下国企混改对企业创新绩效的影响——资源效应与制度效应视角[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(3):73-82.
[18] 胡洪曙,李捷.财政竞争对企业税负不平等的影响[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2023,66(2):52-64.
[19] 马连福, 王丽丽, 张琦. 混合所有制的优序选择:市场的逻辑[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015,33(7): 5-20.
[20] 宋晓玲,李金叶.产业协同集聚、制度环境与工业绿色创新效率[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(4):56-65.
[21] WANG SUSHENG,CHEN GANG,HUANG DAWEI. Can the new energy vehicle pilot policy achieve green innovation and emission reduction——a difference-in-differences analysis on the evaluation of China′s new energy fiscal subsidy policy[J]. Sustainability,2021,13(15):8643.
[22] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[23] CAO QINGZI,WANG HUA,CAO LIFANG. "Business tax to value-added tax" and enterprise innovation output: evidence from listed companies in China[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,2022,58(2):301-310.
[24] 张江雪,朱磊.基于绿色增长的我国各地区工业企业技术创新效率研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,29(2):113-125.
[25] ZHANG MING,YAN TAIHUA,GAO WEN,et al. How does environmental regulation affect real green technology innovation and strategic green technology innovation[J]. The Science of the Total Environment,2023,872:162221.