The manufacturing sector, foundational for a nation and integral to national rejuvenation and strength, serves as a powerful engine for constructing the basics of an industrial modernization system, propelling employment, and achieving shared prosperity. In the current era of the new development paradigm, the manufacturing industry is in a crucial period of overcoming challenges, necessitating urgent and comprehensive implementation of green practices as a novel approach for new industrialization. However, the extensive growth model of high investment, high consumption, high pollution, and low efficiency in China's manufacturing industry has resulted in escalating resource and environmental constraints. The uneven allocation of factors has led to pronounced issues of regional disparities and insufficient green development, prompting the urgent need to unleash the industry's "green genes". Consequently, scrutinizing the green competitiveness of regional manufacturing becomes a pivotal breakthrough for China to achieve high-quality development. The focus of research on green competitiveness has shifted from enterprise-centric environmental governance to encompass green management models, production, supply chains, and ultimately achieving transformation, upgrading, and green development.
Despite existing empirical research studies predominantly concentrating on specific aspects of the spatial distribution of green competitiveness in manufacturing, there is a lack of a comprehensive, multi-dimensional, and multi-scale examination. To address this gap, this study integrates the five new development concepts and the connotation of the new industrialization road, selecting 41 evaluation indicators comprehensively from five dimensions: economic drive, innovation output, energy conservation, environmental regulation, and social security. A vertical and horizontal grading method is introduced to systematically quantify China's manufacturing industry's green competitiveness across 30 provinces, revealing regional differences and sources using the Dagum Gini coefficient and spatial kernel density estimation to grasp dynamic evolution trends. The study further carries out trend predictions through the Markov limit solution.
The results indicate that the overall green competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry shows a growing trend, which can be broadly divided into three characteristic periods on a temporal scale: a fluctuation adjustment period (2006-2010), a stable growth period (2011-2015), and a period of ups and downs (2016-2020). On a regional scale, the distribution pattern reveals a "leading in the east, middle-ranking in the central region, and lagging in the west". Additionally, at both national and regional levels (east, central, and west), there is a pronounced skewness in the distribution of green competitiveness in the manufacturing industry. The overall Gini coefficient of China's manufacturing industry's green competitiveness shows a decreasing trend, with inter-group differences being the primary source of overall variations in green competitiveness. Notably, the differences between the eastern and western regions exhibit a significant expansion and growth trend. On the basis of the diagnostic results of obstacle factors, it is found that the proportion of coal consumption in manufacturing to total energy consumption is a major hindrance. From a dynamic evolution perspective, under conditions without spatial considerations, China's manufacturing industry's green competitiveness displays strong path dependence. A higher level of green competitiveness in the current period may propel a continuous rise in green competitiveness in the later period. Under spatial conditions, while static and dynamic estimation results are similar, there are some differences. Under static conditions, manufacturing green competitiveness shows a certain positive spatial correlation, with the addition of the time factor not significantly affecting the distribution position and shape of China's manufacturing industry's green competitiveness probability subjects. However, under dynamic conditions, spatial spillover effects in the three major regions of the east, central, and west are not uniform. Traditional Markov chain analysis suggests that the development trend of green competitiveness in China's provinces' manufacturing industry is relatively stable, with a low probability of leapfrog transfer. Spatial Markov chain analysis indicates a "club convergence" in China's manufacturing industry's green competitiveness. Looking at the long-term evolutionary trend, the future development of China's manufacturing green competitiveness is expected to gradually improve over time with a trend of concentration towards high values. Different neighborhood status types have heterogeneous effects on the evolution of regional manufacturing green competitiveness, and thus it is essential to shore up weak links and make targeted measures that follow local characteristics to enhance green competitiveness in the manufacturing industry.
Zhang Feng
,
Chen Jiawei
. Regional Gaps, Dynamic Evolution and Trend Prediction of China′s Manufacturing Green Competitiveness[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(4)
: 42
-54
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023070089
[1] PORTER M E,CLAAS V D L. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995, 9(4): 97-118.
[2] PORTER M E,VAN D L C. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate[J]. Harvard Business Review,1995, 8(6): 120-134.
[3] LI Y, ZHANG M. Green manufacturing and environmental productivity growth[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2018,118(6): 1303-1319.
[4] GUNASEKARAN A, SUBRAMANIAN N, YUSUF Y. Strategies and practices for inclusive manufacturing: twenty-first-century sustainable manufacturing competitiveness[J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2018, 31(6): 490-493.
[5] HAFEZALKOTOB A, ZAMANI S. A multi-product green supply chain under government supervision with price and demand uncertainty[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 2019, 15(1): 193-206.
[6] YANG H, LI L, LIU Y. The effect of manufacturing intelligence on green innovation performance in China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 178:121569.
[7] 孙薇,侯煜菲,周彩红.制造业绿色竞争力评价与预测——以江苏省为例[J].中国科技论坛,2019,35(4):124-132,141.
[8] 陈运平,黄小勇.区域绿色竞争力影响因子的探索性分析[J].宏观经济研究,2012,34(12):60-67.
[9] WANG Y, HU H, DAI W, et al. Evaluation of industrial green development and industrial green competitiveness: evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 124: 107371.
[10] 李琳,王足.我国区域制造业绿色竞争力评价及动态比较[J]. 经济问题探索,2017,38(1): 68-75.
[11] ZHANG H, GENG Z, YIN R, et al. Regional differences and convergence tendency of green development competitiveness in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 254: 119922.
[12] WANG N, ZHANG S J, WANG W. Impact of environmental innovation strategy on green competitiveness:evidence from China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(10): 5879.
[13] 杜龙政,赵云辉,陶克涛,等.环境规制、治理转型对绿色竞争力提升的复合效应——基于中国工业的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(10):106-120.
[14] APPOLLONI A, JABBOUR C J C, D'ADAMO I, et al. Green recovery in the mature manufacturing industry: the role of the green-circular premium and sustainability certification in innovative efforts[J]. Ecological Economics, 2022, 193: 107311.
[15] DOLGE K, AZIS R, LUND P D, et al. Importance of energy efficiency in manufacturing industries for climate and competitiveness[J]. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 2021, 25(1): 306-317.
[16] ZENG W, LI L, HUANG Y. Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: evidence from China′s provincial panel data[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123598.
[17] ZHAI X, AN Y. Analyzing influencing factors of green transformation in China′s manufacturing industry under environmental regulation: a structural equation model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 251: 119760.
[18] CHENG X, LONG R, CHEN H, et al. Green competitiveness evaluation of provinces in China based on correlation analysis and fuzzy rough set[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 85: 841-852.
[19] SHANG J, WANG L L. Research on regional industry competitiveness of biomass energy based on entropy weight and TOPSIS[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2011, 121:4646-4650.
[20] 刘华军,杜广杰.中国经济发展的地区差距与随机收敛检验——基于2000—2013年DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,34(10):43-59.
[21] 刘秉镰,秦文晋.中国经济高质量发展水平的空间格局与动态演进[J].中国软科学,2022,37(1):62-75.
[22] 赵宏波,岳丽,刘雅馨,等.高质量发展目标下黄河流域城市居民生活质量的时空格局及障碍因子[J].地理科学,2021,41(8):1303-1313.
[23] 陈明华,张晓萌,刘玉鑫,等.绿色TFP增长的动态演进及趋势预测——基于中国五大城市群的实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2020,36(1):20-44.
[24] 李廉水,程中华,刘军. 中国制造业“新型化”及其评价研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2015,33(2):63-75.