In the era of "New Normal" with VUCA characteristics,how to enhance resilience has become the key for enterprises to avoid dangers and shift into safety and achieve sustainable development. As a strategic choice for knowledge expansion, technological diversification is beneficial for enterprises to diversify external risks, improve their perception and adaptability to the environment and then achieve resilient growth. Although existing research pays attention to the effect of technological diversification on enterprise resilience, the "bridge" between the two needs to be further explored. Continuous innovation related to operational efficiency and strategic flexibility is an important ability to achieve continuous development. According to the theoretical logic of "resource-capability-result", continuous innovation drives enterprises to change their mindset, continuously breaking through development bottlenecks and exploring new growth paths through the integration of diversified technologies. Therefore, continuous innovation may play a mediating role between technological diversification and enterprise resilience. In addition, the results of technological diversification depend on the combination of internal technological exploration and external technological relationships, making enterprises embedded in dual network relationships. In particular, the density of internal collaboration network characterizes the close relationship between internal inventors, which directly affects the effective transfer of diversified technological knowledge and information sharing; the heterogeneous resource advantages brought by the high degree of external collaboration network centrality can effectively alleviate the dilemma of knowledge homogenization in high-density internal cooperative networks, and then accelerate the process of diversified technological development and integration. However, existing research has not focused on the boundary effects of dual networks on the relationship between technological diversification and continuous innovation. Hence, this study aims to explore the internal mechanism between technological diversification and enterprise resilience, and investigate the boundary effect of internal collaboration network density and the three-way moderating effect of external collaboration network centrality from the perspective of dual network.
Following the resource-based theory and the theoretical logic of "resource-capability-result", this study conducts the empirical analysis using a sample of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed enterprises in the new energy automobile industry. The resilience and control variables information of these enterprises is collected from CSMAR and patent data is collected from Incopat. Finally, an unbalanced panel dataset of 285 enterprises from 2010 to 2021 is constructed. The hypotheses are tested by the individual and time-fixed effect models using Stata 15.0.
The results show that (1) there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between technological diversification and enterprise resilience; (2) continuous innovation plays the mediating role in the inverted U-shaped relationship between technological diversity and enterprise resilience; (3) internal collaboration network density negatively moderates the relationship between technological diversification and continuous innovation; (4) external collaboration network centrality further mitigates the negative impact of internal collaboration network density on the relationship between overall technological diversification, unrelated technological diversification, and continuous innovation.
The theoretical contributions of the study are as follows: firstly,it clarifies the relationship between technological diversification and enterprise resilience in the context of a long-term and turbulent environment, and expands the theoretical space of technological diversification and enterprise resilience; secondly,the paper provides empirical evidence for the effect of continuous innovation on enterprise resilience and bridges the gap in the discussion of mechanisms underlying technological diversification and enterprise resilience; finally, from the perspective of dual network,it reveals the boundary effects of dual networks in the relationship between technological diversification and continuous innovation, and deepens the contextual mechanism for the transformation of technological diversification into continuous innovation. The practical contributions are proposed. Enterprises should first cultivate internal skills and moderately expand diversified technology fields based on risk assessment. Then it is necessary to seek change proactively. Enterprises should cultivate continuous innovation ability to leverage the positive effects of technological diversification on enterprise resilience. Finally, enterprise should pay attention to collaboration,encourage inventors to "go out", maintain loose partnerships internally and build a wide collaborative R&D network externally.
[1] 龚红, 李昌昊. 突破“卡脖子”技术:知识开发模式对企业关键核心技术及其衍生技术的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(1):56-65.
[2] 单宇, 许晖, 周连喜,等. 数智赋能:危机情境下组织韧性如何形成——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 84-104,7.
[3] 李平, 竺家哲. 组织韧性:最新文献评述[J].外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(3): 25-41.
[4] 贾勇, 傅倩汪琳, 李冬姝. 技术创新与企业韧性:基于新冠疫情情景[J].管理科学, 2023, 36(2): 17-34.
[5] MAFABI S, MUNENE J, NTAYI J. Knowledge management and organizational resilience: organizational innovation as a mediator in uganda parastatals[J].Journal of Strategy and Management, 2012, 5(1): 57-80.
[6] TOGNAZZO A,GUBITTA P,FAVARON S D. Does slack always affect resilience?a study of quasi-medium-sized Italian firms[J].Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,2016,28(9/10):768-790.
[7] 徐娟. 技术多元化、核心技术能力与企业绩效——来自新能源汽车行业上市公司的面板数据[J].经济管理, 2016, 38(12): 74-88.
[8] 王耀德, 林良. 协同创新网络成员多样性如何影响企业探索式创新——技术多元化的中介效应[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(22): 76-82.
[9] 王海花, 李雅洁, 李烨,等. 数字化变革背景下技术多元化对企业韧性的影响[J].系统管理学报,2024,33(2):391-403.
[10] DO H, BUDHWAR P, SHIPTON H, et al. Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism[J].Journal of Business Research, 2022, 141(4): 808-821.
[11] 段海艳. 企业持续创新影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(15): 87-93.
[12] 李德辉, 潘丽君. 海归劣势、持续创新能力与新创科技企业生存:基于企业事件史的分析[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(5): 76-85.
[13] 张秀娥, 滕欣宇. 组织韧性内涵、维度及测量[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(10): 9-17.
[14] 张娜, 刘凤朝. 双层次合作网络构建对企业探索性创新绩效的影响[J].管理工程学报, 2021, 35(1): 1-11.
[15] 杜玉申, 刘梓毓. 技术多元化、协作研发网络中心度与企业创新绩效[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(15): 74-81.
[16] ZHANG N N, YOU D Y, TANG L, et al. Knowledge path dependence, external connection, and radical inventions: evidence from Chinese academy of sciences[J].Research Policy, 2023,52(4):104738.
[17] 李小丽, 陈蕾. 技术多元化、发明者网络嵌入与军民融合企业技术创新效率[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(23): 140-150.
[18] 郭叶波, 夏成, 张舰. 后疫情时代提升长三角地区汽车产业链发展韧性研究[J].中国物价, 2023,36(6): 46-49.
[19] CHEN Y S, CHANG K C. Using the entropy-based patent measure to explore the influences of related and unrelated technological diversification upon technological competences and firm performance [J].Scientometrics, 2012, 90(3): 825-841.
[20] CHIU Y C, LAI H C, LEE T Y, et al. Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008, 75(6): 875-892.
[21] CHEN Y M, YANG D H, LIN F J. Does technological diversification matter to firm performance? the moderating role of organization slack[J].Journal of Business Research, 2013, 66(10): 1970-1975.
[22] SAHEBJAMNIA N, TORABI S A, MANSOURI S A. Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 197(3): 63-83.
[23] BUSTINZA O F, VENDRELL-HERRERO F, PEREZ-AROSTEGUI M N, et al. Technological capabilities, resilience capabilities and organizational effectiveness[J].International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2019, 30(8): 1370-1392.
[24] 谢露群, 钱静舒, 王倩. IT能力对组织韧性的影响研究[J].管理学报, 2023, 20(9): 1295-1302.
[25] 孙国强, 杨晶, 闫绪娴. 网络嵌入、知识搜索与组织韧性——数字化转型的调节作用[J]. 科学决策, 2021,28(11):18-31.
[26] DESJARDINE M,BANSAL P,YANG Y.Bouncing back: building resilience through social and environmental practices in the context of the 2008 global financial crisis[J].Journal of Management, 2019,45(4):1434-1460.
[27] JUNGHO K, CHANG Y L, YUNOK C. Technological diversification, core-technology competence, and firm growth[J].Research Policy, 2016, 45(1):113-124.
[28] SABAHI S, PARAST M M. Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: a dynamic capability perspective[J].International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications, 2019, 23(3): 254-269.
[29] HALLAK R, ASSAKER G, O'CONNOR P, et al. Firm performance in the upscale restaurant sector: the effects of resilience, creative self-efficacy, innovation and industry experience[J].Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018,40(1): 229-240.
[30] 蒋舒阳, 庄亚明, 刘夏群. 企业如何进行内外部科研合作网络构建:以我为主抑或博才众长[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(19): 69-77.
[31] ORTIZ-DE-MANDOJANA N, BANSAL P. The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2016,37(8):1615 -1631.
[32] SAJKO M, BOONE C, BUYL T. CEO greed, corporate social responsibility, and organizational resilience to systemic shocks[J].Journal of Management, 2021, 47(4): 957-992.
[33] 白旻, 王仁祥. 企业社会责任如何影响企业持续创新[J].中国科技论坛, 2020,36(1): 107-115.
[34] HAANS R F J, PIETERS C, HE Z L. Thinking about U theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(7): 1177-1195.
[35] EDWARDS J R, LAMBERT L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J].Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1): 1-22.