Enabled by digital technology, innovation ecology can efficiently realize the transfer, interaction, expansion and evolution of knowledge, and form the core competitiveness of the digital age. At present, China has initially explored an innovation ecosystem supported by "new infrastructure" such as 5G, Internet of Things, industrial Internet and artificial intelligence, with industry leading enterprises as the main body and "platform + a large number of small and medium-sized enterprises" as the main structure, which has become a prototype of the integration of China's digital economy and the real economy, and can meet the needs of future scenarios better. The long-term development of the innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform is the key to the integration of China's digital economy and the real economy.
However, the current academic research on industrial Internet platform dwells on connotation analysis, exploration and application, and business model analysis, and there is a lack of research on industrial Internet clusters and their ecology. In addition, current studies on the value co-creation of innovation ecosystems are mainly conducted from the perspectives of the innovation ecosystem subjects, and the network relationship formed between the subjects and the external innovation environment, but less attention is paid to the co-creation relationship between the platform and manufacturing enterprises, between intelligent devices and humans, and between machines and data to explain the value co-creation process mechanism of the innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform. The value co-creation mechanism of the innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform is yet to be revealed.
The innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform takes digital resources and digital infrastructure as key production factors, reshaping the win-win cooperation logic in the industrial value network, and reflecting unique characteristics different from the general innovation ecosystem. Therefore, drawing on the value co-creation theory of the innovation ecosystem, this study explores three mechanisms, including modularity, scenario, and complementarity from the intrinsic attributes, and analyzes their interactive utility. This paper selects the COSMOPlat Industrial Internet platform as the case study object; it adopts a structured data analysis method to analyze the case, encodes and abstracts the original data, realizes the analysis and induction of the theme, and finally extracts a rigorous theoretical theme, forming a data structure composed of first-order constructs, second-order themes and third-order categories.
It is found that (1) the innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform is a value creation and value acquisition system composed of multiple participants in different fields. It is an open, supply-and-demand-driven, loosely coupled innovation system based on a multi-platform interactive architecture, and the innovation system can improve the initiative of each subject to participate and the digital ability and innovation diffusion ability through the sharing and symbiosis of technology, resources and scenes, so as to achieve the goal of system innovation. (2) The innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform achieves a win-win situation of efficiency and collaboration within the ecosystem on the supply side through modularity and complementarity, and integrates the demand side into the ecosystem through the scenario mechanism to form a future-oriented co-creation system. The modularity mechanism effectively integrates information technology infrastructure, big data technology, blockchain technology, and artificial intelligence technology, and builds a multi-platform interactive architecture to promote the integration of data and reality. The scenario-based mechanism accesses the scalable new generation of intelligent technology to construct the user scenario-based experience, and activates multiple subjects to actively embed the ecology through the governance scene to create a win-win situation. The complementary mechanism and modular technology are nested in multiple layers to complete the industry technology complementarity and digital technology complementarity, match scenarios to iterate the solution covering the whole life cycle of users, optimize collaborative innovation among various entities in the ecosystem through the platform enabling process complementarity. (3) The innovation ecosystem led by the industrial Internet platform integrates resources efficiently to achieve value co-creation through the modular mechanism, scenario mechanism, and complementary mechanism, improves the ecological digitization ability, and forms the same side network effect, cross-side network effect and cross-domain network effect of the innovation ecosystem.
Wang Shuilian
,
Fu Hanhan
. The Value Co-creation Mechanism of Innovation Ecosystem Led by Industrial Internet platform: A Case Study of COSMOPlat[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2025
, 42(2)
: 31
-39
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023090091
[1] 孙新波,张明超,王永霞.工业互联网平台赋能促进数据化商业生态系统构建机理案例研究[J].管理评论,2022,34(1):322-337.
[2] GAWER A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework[J]. Research Policy,2014,43(7):1239-1249.
[3] 陈武,陈建安,李燕萍.工业互联网平台:内涵、演化与赋能[J].经济管理,2022,44(5):189-208.
[4] KUMAR N, QIU L, KUMAR S. Exit,voice, and response on digital platforms: an empirical investigation of online management response strategies[J]. Information Systems Research,2018,29(4):849-870.
[5] O'HALLORAN D,E KVOCHKO.Industrial internet of things: unleashing the potential of connected products and services[R]. Switzerland: Davos-Klosters,2015.
[6] 周晓阳,李长长,刘莹,等.工业互联网平台、开发商与企业的三方协作演化策略——兼论政府补贴和收益共享的作用[J].中国管理科学,2024,40(1):276-287.
[7] 赵宏霞,王梦娟,王国涛.工业互联网平台生态嵌入对参与企业探索式创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(15):89-98.
[8] ANDER R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem[J]. Harvard Business Review,2006,84(4):98-107.
[9] 孙鑫,张路娜,刘肖肖.中国工业互联网产业创新生态系统的现状、问题及优化对策[J].科技和产业,2023,23(9):98-104.
[10] 赵艺璇,成琼文,李紫君.共生视角下技术主导型与市场主导型创新生态系统价值共创组态路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(11):21-30.
[11] YIN R K.Case study research: design and methods[M]. New York: Sage publications, 2014.
[12] YOO Y, HENFRIDSSON O, LYYTINEN K. Research commentary——the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research,2010,21(4):724-735.
[13] MIOZZO M, GRIMASHAW D. Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK[J]. Research Policy, 2005,34(9):1419-1439.
[14] 王水莲,于程灏,张佳悦.工业互联网平台价值创造过程研究[J].中国科技论坛,2022,39(4):78-88.
[15] TILSON D, LYYTINEN K. Research commentary——digital infrastructures: the missing is research agenda[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4):748-759.
[16] 吕文晶,陈劲,刘进.工业互联网的智能制造模式与企业平台建设——基于海尔集团的案例研究[J].中国软科学,2019,34(7):1-13.
[17] HANSETH O, LYYTINEN K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet[C].Enacting research methods in information systems[M].Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2016:104-142.
[18] 尹西明,苏雅欣,陈劲,等.场景驱动的创新:内涵特征、理论逻辑与实践进路[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(15):1-10.
[19] MILLMAN T F. Global key account management and systems selling[J]. International Business Review, 1996, 5(6): 631-645.
[20] LENKA S V, PARIDA, J WINCENT. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2017, 34(1):92-100.
[21] 李晓华,高旭东,李纪珍.柔性框架:AI领域的学术创业企业如何跨越“死亡之谷” [J].南开管理评论,2023,26(10):1-20.
[22] 焦豪.数字平台生态观:数字经济时代的管理理论新视角[J].中国工业经济,2023,40(7):122-141.
[23] 王倩,柳卸林.企业跨界创新中的价值共创研究:基于生态系统视角[J].科研管理,2023,44(4):11-18.
[24] 廖民超,金佳敏,蒋玉石,等.数字平台能力与制造业服务创新绩效——网络能力和价值共创的链式中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(5):55-63.
[25] JACOBIDES M G,CENNAMO C , GAWER A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2018,39: 2255-2276.
[26] 王水莲,钱鹏浩,王静.场景赋能驱动下的工业互联网平台成长演化——“柠檬豆”案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(6):11-20.