ESG information disclosure is regarded as a systematic and comprehensive way of releasing corporate non-financial responsibilities such as ecological environmental responsibilities,social responsibilities,and corporate governance responsibilities to the stakeholders. More and more listed companies have taken ESG information disclosure as an important means of establishing their green corporate image and gaining momentum for achieving high green innovation performance,and how the companies can improve green innovation performance through ESG information disclosure motivation has attracted attention from the research field. Many scholars have found that internal factors such as corporate financial performance,values,risks,and investment evaluation,and external factors like pressure from governmental environment regulation,public environmental concern,and consumers' green consumption intentions,have a great impact on the corporate motivation to disclose ESG information to outsiders. ESG information disclosure is beneficial for corporate reputation management,exerting green spillover effects and value transmission effects to generate altruistic social value. However,there is still controversy about whether ESG information disclosure motivation can positively affect green innovation. Some scholars argue that corporate ESG information disclosure motivation is restricted by macro policy and institutional factors and may have no significant impact on green innovation performance; besides,the impact mechanism of ESG report information disclosure motivation upon corporate green image is still unclear and remains an unsolved “black box” for the present researchers. Therefore,it is of significance to have a comprehensive understanding on the correlation between ESG information disclosure motivation,green image and green innovation and thus know how to help companies promote green development.
Following the motivation theory,the signal transmission theory and the environmental psychological value-belief-norm theory,this study constructs a conceptual model of the relationship among the dual motivations of corporate ESG report information disclosure,green image,green value cognition,and green innovation performance,taking green image as a mediating variable and green value cognition as a moderating variable,to explore the impact mechanism of ESG information disclosure motivation upon green innovation performance. It divides the motivators of corporate ESG information disclosure into egoistic ones and altruistic ones,in which the egoistic motivators mainly refer to those generated by the corporates to meet the needs of self-growth reputation,resource needs,etc. ,while the altruistic motivators mean those generated by the corporates to meet the needs of social responsibility and social value realization. The study adopts the questionnaire survey method of 254 samples from the listed companies that have released ESG reports between 2018 and 2022 and finds that ESG information disclosure motivators,no matter egoistic ones or altruistic ones,both have a significant positive impact upon corporate green innovation performance; green image plays a mediating role in the relationship between ESG information disclosure motivation and green innovation performance; and the top managers' green value cognition positively adjusts ESG information disclosure motivation and green innovation performance. This study also discovers that ESG information disclosure motivation can help companies solve the problems of information asymmetry and agency conflicts,convey environmental,social and governance information to stakeholders,and meet the corporate green development needs. The more attention corporates have paid to ESG information disclosure motivation,the higher the green innovation performance they are likely to achieve.
In summary,by adopting the environmental psychological value-belief-norm theory,this study expands the field of interdisciplinary theoretical research and enriches theoretical research perspectives; it uncovers the impact mechanism “black box” of ESG information disclosure upon green innovation performance,discusses the role and significance of green image construction from multiple dimensions,and provides basic theoretical support for improving the self-utility and social utility of corporate green image,enhancing the top managers' green image awareness,and thus improving the corporate green innovation performance.
In order to gain continuous momentum for improving green innovation performance,the companies should actively promote ESG information disclosure motivation,improve corporate green image and the top managers' green value awareness. Besides,in the current context of China's comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development,the government should strongly enforce the corporate ESG information disclosure laws,insistently strengthen the supervision and technical guidance on ESG information disclosure,and stimulate corporates' enthusiasm for their ESG information disclosure by providing green subsidies and other preferable policies.
[1] ARVIDSSON S,DUMAY J.Corporate ESG reporting quantity,quality and performance:where to now for environmental policy and practice[J].Business Strategy and the Environment,2021,31(3): 1091-1110.
[2] 石凡,王克明.地方政府官员环保考核压力与上市公司ESG表现[J].财经问题研究,2023,45(6):116-129.
[3] 黄大禹,谢获宝,邹梦婷.双碳背景下环境规制与企业ESG表现——基于宏观和微观双层机制的实证[J].山西财经大学学报,2023,45(10):83-96.
[4] 胡洁,于宪荣,韩一鸣.ESG评级能否促进企业绿色转型——基于多时点双重差分法的验证[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(7):90-111.
[5] BROGI M,LAGASIO V.Environmental,social and governance and company profitability: are financial intermediaries different[J].Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,2019,26(3):576-587.
[6] 孟猛猛,谈湘雨,刘思蕊,等.企业ESG表现对绿色创新的影响研究[J].技术经济,2023,42(7):13-24.
[7] 李媛媛,殷俊明,钱驾佳,等.ESG表现与绿色创新[J].南京财经大学学报,2023,21(2):32-42.
[8] FRIEDMAN M.The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits[J].New York Times Magazine,2008,13(33):173-178.
[9] GARCIA A S,ORSATO R J.Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: a study about environmental performance [J].Business Strategy and the Environment,2020,29(8):3261-3272.
[10] 杨皖苏,杨善林.中国情境下企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——基于大、中小型上市公司的对比分析[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(1):143-150.
[11] 王琳,李欢,高伊琳,等.信息披露质量对企业声誉的影响及作用机制——基于上海电气财务爆雷事件的案例分析[J].管理评论,2022,34(8):341-352.
[12] 刘飞燕,李昕冉.消费者主动性人格对绿色产品购买意愿的影响研究——绿色品牌形象的调节作用[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(2): 68-80.
[13] PRIOR D,SURROCA J,TRIBO J A.Are socially responsible managers really ethical? exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility[J].Corporate Governance: An International Review,2008,16(3):160-177.
[14] MAI N K,NGUYEN A K T,NGUYEN T T.Implementation of corporate social responsibility strategy to enhance firm reputation and competitive advantage[J].Journal of Competitiveness,2021,13(4):96-114.
[15] 刘柏,卢家锐,琚涛.形式主义还是实质主义:ESG评级软监管下的绿色创新研究[J].南开管理评论,2023,26(5):16-28.
[16] STERN P C,DIETZ T,ABEL T,et al.A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism[J].Human Ecology Review,1999,6(2): 81-97.
[17] RYAN R M,DECI R L.Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,2000,25(1): 54-67.
[18] FRIEDE G,BUSCH T,BASSEN A.ESG and financial performance:aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies [J].Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment,2015,5(4): 210-233.
[19] 王治,彭百川.企业ESG表现对创新绩效的影响[J].统计与决策,2022,38(24):164-168.
[20] 王波,杨茂佳.ESG表现对企业价值的影响机制研究——来自我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].软科学,2022,36(6):78-84.
[21] XIE J,NOZAWA W,YAGI M,et al.Do environmental,social,and governance activities improve corporate financial performance[J].Business Strategy and the Environment,2019,28(2): 286-300.
[22] RUF B M,MURALIDHAR K,BROWAN R,et al.An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder theory perspective[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2001,32(2):143-156.
[23] ECCLES R G,IOANNOU I,SERAFEIM G.The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance[J].Management Science,2014,60(11): 2835-2857.
[24] GODFREY P C.The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2005,30(4): 777-798.
[25] 冯丽艳,肖翔,程小可.社会责任对企业风险的影响效应:基于我国经济环境的分析[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(6):141-154.
[26] LENA E.The role of green marketing and green brand image in enhancing purchase intention[J].International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development,2021,5(6): 2456-2470.
[27] PAVELIN S,PORTER L A.The corporate social performance content of innovation in the U.K.[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2008,80(4):711-725.
[28] 谢佩洪,陈昌东.品牌认知的双轨驱动机制与市场细分取向[J].管理学报,2019,16(2):263-272.
[29] 方先明,胡丁.企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证[J].经济研究,2023,58(2):91-106.
[30] 谭劲松,黄仁玉,张京心.ESG表现与企业风险-基于资源获取视角的解释[J].管理科学,2022,35(5):3-18.
[31] 付丙海,张庆明,孙秀梅.跨界学习、价值认知激活与裂变型新创企业绩效[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-10[2024-03-01].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20230221.0951.004.html.
[32] STERN P C.Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior[J].Journal of Social Issues,2000,56(3):407-424.
[33] 张峰,任仕佳,殷秀清.高技术产业绿色技术创新效率及其规模质量门槛效应[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(7):59-68.
[34] 李杰义,张汞,谢琳娜.环境知识学习、绿色创新行为与环境绩效[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(15):122-128.
[35] 翟胜宝,程妍婷,许浩然,等.媒体关注与企业ESG信息披露质量[J].会计研究,2022,43(8):59-71.
[36] CHEN Y S.The drier of green innovation and green image-green competence[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2008,81(3):531-543.