With the rapid development and wide application of digital technology, the digital economy is promoting profound changes in the modes of production, living and governance, and has become a key force in changing the pattern of global competition. In order to improve their competitiveness and achieve sustainable development in the complex and changing digital environment, many enterprises are accelerating digital transformation. Manufacturing enterprises as the micro embodiment of the deep integration of the digital economy and the real economy, promoting their successful digital transformation not only helps to enhance their own competitive advantage, but also has great significance for the construction of a manufacturing power and digital China. Digital transformation is a transformation process characterized by dynamism, continuity and adaptability, which is essentially the use of digital technology to achieve insights into external stimuli and make agile responses, and most companies do not have a smooth ride in the digital transformation process. In this context, it is crucial to have an agile workforce adapted to the digital transformation and upgrading of manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, how to better cultivate and improve employee agility has become a focus of attention in both the academic and business worlds.
Existing research on the factors affecting employee agility mainly focuses on organizational and individual factors, and few scholars have explored its impact on employee agility from a leadership perspective. Existing research shows that leadership is an important antecedent variable that affects employees' psychology, attitude and behavior. Digital leadership is a concept developed for successful digital transformation and refers to the ability of leaders to create a clear and meaningful vision for their organization's digital transformation, to encourage employees to actively participate in their organization's digital transformation, and to lead their organization's members in executing and successfully implementing their digital transformation strategy. Digital leadership reflects the strong willingness of leaders to change, and leaders will actively promote the digital transformation of the enterprise. In addition, leaders focus on improving employees' digital capabilities during the transformation process, and are happy to provide employees with more information sharing and work autonomy. This helps to stimulate employees' sense of efficacy and passion for their work, encouraging them to take the initiative to learn new skills, adapt themselves to changes in the environment, and present greater flexibility in their work. Therefore, this study investigates the mechanism and boundary conditions of digital leadership on employee agility with employees in manufacturing companies as the research object.
This study uses the questionnaire survey method to collect data, and after screening and eliminating invalid data, a total of 570 valid samples are obtained. Descriptive statistical analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, homology bias test, etc. are conducted by SPSS and AMOS to verify the hypotheses. The results show that digital leadership has a positive effect on employee agility; digital self-efficacy and harmonious work passion play a partially mediating role in the relationship between digital leadership and employee agility; and openness to change has a positive moderating effect between digital leadership and the relationship between employee agility, digital self-efficacy, and harmonious work passion.
The results of this study have enriched and deepened research in relevant fields, and have certain theoretical innovation and practical significance. First, the antecedent research on employee agility is enriched from a leadership perspective. Combined with the context of digital transformation, exploring the impact of digital leadership on employee agility not only enriches the theoretical research results on employee agility, but also has important practical significance. Second, following the cognitive-affective personality systems theory, this study reveals how digital leadership impacts employee agility through the dual paths of digital self-efficacy and harmonic work passion, filling the theoretical caps in the existing literature. Third, the boundary conditions of digital leadership on employee agility are clarified by introducing individual-level openness to change as a moderating variable. Finally, this study provides managerial recommendations on how to improve employee agility, including cultivating digital leadership, stimulating employees' digital self-efficacy and harmonious work passion, and enhancing employees' openness to change.
[1] 王守义, 刘柄呈. 制造业企业数字化转型的区域差异及其动态演进[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2023,38(7): 32-45.
[2] BRAUN T J, HAYES B C, DEMUTH R L F, et al. The development, validation, and practical application of an employee agility and resilience measure to facilitate organizational change[J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2017,10(4): 703-723.
[3] VARSHNEY D, VARSHNEY N K. Workforce agility and its links to emotional intelligence and workforce performance: a study of small entrepreneurial firms in India[J]. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 2020,39(5): 35-45.
[4] ALAVI S, ABD WAHAB D, MUHAMAD N, et al. Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014,52(21): 6273-6295.
[5] CAI Z, HUANG Q, LIU H, et al. Improving the agility of employees through enterprise social media: the mediating role of psychological conditions[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018,38(1): 52-63.
[6] ZHU M, SUN Y, JEYARAJ A, et al. Impact of task characteristics on employee agility: the moderating effect of enterprise social media visibility[J]. Internet Research, 2021,31(3): 931-960.
[7] MUDULI A,PANDYA G.Psychological empowerment and workforce agility[J]. Psychological Studies, 2018,63(3): 276-285.
[8] LAI H, PITAFI A H, HASANY N, et al. Enhancing employee agility through information technology competency: an empirical study of china[J]. SAGE Open, 2021,11(2):1-18.
[9] 邹艳春, 彭坚, 侯楠. 参与式领导与创新绩效:一个被调节的双中介模型[J]. 管理科学, 2020,33(3): 39-51.
[10] 朱健, 张彬. 因循守旧,还是独辟蹊径?数字化领导对团队与个体创造力的多层次影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023,40(23): 129-139.
[11] 李燕萍, 苗力. 企业数字领导力的结构维度及其影响——基于中国情境的扎根理论研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020,73(6): 125-136.
[12] SALANCIK G R, PFEFFER J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978,23(2): 224-253.
[13] 欧阳晨慧, 马志强, 朱永跃. 工作场所数字化对员工创新行为的影响:一个被调节的中介模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023,40(9): 129-139.
[14] MISCHEL W, SHODA Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure[J]. Psychological Review, 1995,102(2): 246-268.
[15] 褚昊, 黄宁宁. 悖论式领导对员工工作绩效的影响:二元工作激情和角色认同的作用[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2020,41(6): 133-140.
[16] MARAN T K, LIEGL S, DAVILA A, et al. Who fits into the digital workplace? mapping digital self-efficacy and agility onto psychological traits[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022,175: 121352.
[17] KLUS M F, MULLER J. The digital leader: what one needs to master today' s organisational challenges[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2021,91(8): 1189-1223.
[18] 谢鹏, 马璐, 韦依依, 等. 数字化领导力与组织创新:数字平台能力和环境竞争性的作用[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2023,44(1): 129-144.
[19] KANE G C, PHILLIPS A N, COPULSKY J, et al. How digital leadership is (n' t) different[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2019,60(3): 34-39.
[20] 刘追, 张媛媛. 团队情境下电子领导力对工作重塑的影响研究——基于社会交换理论和组织变革理论[J]. 领导科学, 2021,37(22): 92-96.
[21] BANDURA A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J]. Psychological Review, 1977,84(2): 191-215.
[22] ULFERT-BLANK A, SCHMIDT I. Assessing digital self-efficacy: review and scale development[J]. Computers & Education, 2022,191: 104626.
[23] VALLERAND R J, BLANCHARD C, MAGEAU G A, et al. Les passions de l'ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003,85(4): 756-767.
[24] ZIGARMI D, NIMON K, HOUSON D, et al. Beyond engagement: toward a framework and operational definition for employee work passion[J]. Human Resource Development Review, 2009,8(3): 300-326.
[25] 许黎明, 赵曙明, 张敏. 二元工作激情中介作用下的辱虐管理对员工建言行为影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018,15(10): 988-995.
[26] WANBERG C R, BANAS J T. Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000,85(1): 132-142.
[27] MILLER V D, JOHNSON J R, GRAU J. Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change[J]. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1994,22(1): 59-80.
[28] ZEIKE S, BRADBURY K, LINDERT L, et al. Digital leadership skills and associations with psychological well-being[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(14): 2628.
[29] KIM M, OH J, KIM B. Experience of digital music services and digital self-efficacy among older adults: enjoyment and anxiety as mediators[J]. Technology in Society, 2021,67: 101773.
[30] ASHKANASY N M, HUMPHREY R H, HUY Q N. Integrating emotions and affect in theories of management[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2017,42(2): 175-189.