Promoting the sound and fast development of new quality productive forces is a crucial step for China to respond to the new challenges of the global science and technology revolution and industrial transformation in the new era and achieve high-quality economic development. In the context of the digital era, the infiltration of digital technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence, and blockchain into the real economy has given rise to new models and industries such as smart manufacturing and digital agriculture, and changed the way traditional industries produce and operate. The integration of digital economy and real economy has become an important systemic base and strategic driving force for the development of new quality productive forces. However, infrastructure bottlenecks and uneven regional development limit the role of digital-physical integration in promoting the development of new quality productive forces. How to further promote the integration of digital economy with real economy, with a focus on developing new quality productive forces, is a key question that must be addressed at present.
Existing research has addressed the role of economic activities generated in the process of digital-physical integration in promoting new quality productive forces, but it has not yet clarified how digital-physical integration can better form new quality productive forces. In fact, no single factor can adequately elucidate the intricate dynamics propelling the advancement of new quality productivity; thus, a broader perspective is essential for a more holistic understanding. While a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient for guiding regions in selecting development drivers that align with their unique circumstances, necessitating further investigation into diverse pathways tailored to specific realities. Additionally, empirical research that systematically examines the evolution of data-physical integration and its qualitative influence on new quality productivity remains scarce.
Considering the complex interactive effects of the elements of digital-physical integration, this paper, based on the view of complex systems, constructs an analysis framework of "digital foundation-digital industry-digital finance-industrial structure-industrial agglomeration-industrial chain modernization" for digital-physical integration. It uses the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis method to analyze and reveal the relationship between the path evolution of digital-physical integration and the emergence of new quality productive forces in the case of 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities across China from 2013 to 2022.
The research results show that (1) neither the digital economy nor the real economy possesses a single, indispensable condition for fostering high new quality productive forces. (2) In the aggregated configuration analysis, there are mainly three constituting pathways, namely, digital finance empowerment type, full-chain digital upgrade type, and high-tech industry agglomeration type. (3) A comparison of the configuration results indicates that a robust digital foundation and a thriving digital industry are pivotal in catalyzing new quality productive forces during digital-physical integration, whereas digital finance and industrial agglomeration exhibit a substitutable relationship. (4) The inter-group analysis shows that the aggregated configuration has a temporal universality, while the formation of new quality productive forces has undergone an evolutionary process from high-tech industry agglomeration-oriented to digital finance empowerment-oriented and further differentiation. (5) The intra-group analysis indicates that the formation of new quality productive forces requires tailored development, and the agglomeration-oriented configuration of high-tech industries is suitable for areas where the industrial chain is not yet fully developed, while areas with better digital finance development are more poised to cultivate new quality productive forces.
This paper establishes an analytical framework of "digital economy-real economy" linkage configuration for the emergence of new-quality productive forces, revealing the complex causal relationships behind the emergence of new-quality productive forces. It analyzes the development of new-quality productive forces, which has undergone a transformation from the regulation of a materialized economic system to the regulation of a virtualized economic system. The paper has developed the perspective of complex systems regarding the creation of new technologies.Furthermore, it offers tailored recommendations for enhancing new-quality productive forces, tailored to local contexts, such as bolstering the construction of digital infrastructure and the digital industry, encouraging and supporting the development of digital finance, and accelerating the industrial chain's modernization.
Hu Haichen
,
Zhao Ruitong
,
Yang Meng
,
Lin Qiaohua
. The Path of New Quality Productive Forces Generated in the Integration of Digital and Real Economy: An Analysis Based on Dynamic QCA[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024
, 41(22)
: 37
-47
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2024050763
[1] 中央财办有关负责同志详解2023年中央经济工作会议精神[N]. 人民日报, 2023-12-08.
[2] 张姣玉,徐政,丁守海. 数实深度融合与新质生产力交互的逻辑机理、战略价值与实践路径[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(3): 114-124.
[3] 卢鹏.数实融合驱动新质生产力涌现的逻辑与实践进路[J/OL].电子政务:1-11[2024-05-13].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5181.TP.20240422.0908.002.html.
[4] 张志鑫,郑晓明,钱晨.“四链”融合赋能新质生产力:内在逻辑和实践路径[J/OL].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版):1-12[2024-05-13].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail /37.1100.C.20240320.0940.002.html.
[5] 张夏恒,刘彩霞.数据要素推进新质生产力实现的内在机制与路径研究[J/OL].产业经济评论:1-21[2024-05-13].https://doi.org/10.19313/j.cnki.cn10-1223/f.20240313.002.
[6] 周文, 许凌云. 论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J]. 改革, 2023,36(10): 1-13.
[7] 杨秋菊,王文福. 数字普惠金融、新质生产力与城乡共同富裕 [J]. 中国流通经济, 2024, 38 (6): 115-126.
[8] 孙献贞,李言,高雨晨. 数字普惠金融发展与企业新质生产力 [J/OL]. 兰州学刊, 1-13[2024-06-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1015.C.20240615.2141.002.html.
[9] 刘志彪,凌永辉,孙瑞东. 新型支柱产业:发展新质生产力的主阵地与政策选择 [J/OL]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1-14[2024-06-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/37.1100.C.20240607.1643.018.html.
[10] 任保平. 生产力现代化转型形成新质生产力的逻辑[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(3): 12-19.
[11] 黄群慧, 盛方富. 新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J]. 改革, 2024,37(2): 15-24.
[12] IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL, CAMINO DEL CERRO DEL AGUILA, MADRID, et al. A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research[J]. Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2016, 1(1): 11-41.
[13] ARTHUR W B. Foundations of complexity economics[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3(2): 136-145.
[14] 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-145.
[15] 布莱恩·阿瑟. 复杂经济学[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社, 2018.
[16] SOUSA M J, ROCHA A. Skills for disruptive digital business[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 94: 257-263.
[17] 李治国, 王杰. 数字经济发展、数据要素配置与制造业生产率提升[J]. 经济学家, 2021,33(10): 41-50.
[18] 黄先海, 高亚兴. 数实产业技术融合与企业全要素生产率——基于中国企业专利信息的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023,41(11): 118-136.
[19] PARK Y, PAVLOU P A, SARAF N. Configurations for achieving organizational ambidexterity with digitization[J]. Information Systems Research, 2020, 31(4): 1376-1397.
[20] RADICIC D, PETKOVIC S. Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 191: 122474.
[21] 王军, 朱杰, 罗茜. 中国数字经济发展水平及演变测度[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(7): 26-42.
[22] 韩文龙,张瑞生,赵峰.新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(6):5-25.
[23] 付凌晖. 我国产业结构高级化与经济增长关系的实证研究[J]. 统计研究, 2010, 27(8): 79-81.
[24] 王林辉, 姜昊, 董直庆. 工业智能化会重塑企业地理格局吗[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022,40(2): 137-155.
[25] 张虎, 张毅, 韩爱华. 我国产业链现代化的测度研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(11): 3-18.
[26] PAPPAS I O. Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 58: 102310.
[27] 荆玲玲,黄慧丽. 时空双维下数字创新生态系统对区域创新能力的激发与影响研究——基于省域面板数据的动态QCA分析 [J/OL]. 科技进步与对策, 1-11[2024-06-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20240112.1408.012.html.
[28] 张吉昌,龙静,王泽民. 什么样的制度环境有利于产生高创业活跃度——基于省域面板数据的动态QCA分析 [J/OL]. 科技进步与对策, 1-13[2024-06-20]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20231205.2223.016.html.
[29] 任相伟,孙丽文.因情施策:如何激活制造企业多元绿色转型路径——基于模糊集定性比较分析方法的研究[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-9[2024-06-20].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20240425.1330.002.html.
[30] NAVARRO S, LLINARES C, GARZON D. Exploring the relationship between co-creation and satisfaction using QCA[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(4): 1336-1339.
[31] 胡玥,张涵萌.数字金融发展与企业技能劳动力结构优化[J/OL].外国经济与管理:1-17[2024-05-13].https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20240331.201.
[32] 徐丹, 于渤. 高技术产业集聚对区域阶段创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3): 113-121.