Enterprise Innovation Management

Digital Transformation Path of Small and Medium-Sized Private Manufacturing Enterprises within the Framework of "Strategic Triangle"

  • Wang Ye ,
  • Jiang Zongzheng
Expand
  • (School of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300382, China)

Received date: 2023-06-27

  Revised date: 2023-08-29

  Online published: 2024-11-11

Abstract

According to Accenture's "China Enterprise Digital Transformation Index 2021" report, only 16% of China's leading enterprises have achieved significant results in digital transformation, and the majority of enterprises are still in the early stages of digital transformation. As the main carriers of industrial digital transformation, small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises are confronted with greater barriers than large enterprises due to their limited resources of digital technologies and talents. While digital transformation is subject to the interaction of multiple factors, such as system, environment, organization, and technology, and the absence of any key factors or mismatch between the factors may lead to the failure of the transformation. There is relatively little research on digital transformation of small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs), and from the research methodology, most of the existing literature uses qualitative analysis to discuss the influencing factors and process models of digital transformation of small and medium-sized enterprises, and quantitative research is rare; from the content of the research, most of the existing quantitative studies on digital transformation of SMEs have been conducted from the perspectives of resources and capabilities to analyze the "net effect" of individual factors on the digital transformation of enterprises, paying less attention to factors at other levels (such as industry and system, etc.), and ignoring the coordination and interaction between factors at different levels, which makes it difficult to figure out how SMEs with heterogeneous resources can choose the appropriate path of digital transformation.
Within the "strategy triangle" framework constructed by Peng et al., this study adopts the research method of combining qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and necessary conditions analysis (NCA) to elucidate the configuration effects of the six conditions of the marketization process, digital policy support, leadership structure, concentration ratio, digital resource infrastructure, and adaptation capacity on the digital transformation of enterprises. Meanwhile, the private manufacturing enterprises listed on China GEM in 2021 are selected as the initial research object, and after eliminating the serious lack of relevant data and ST and *ST enterprises, this paper finally obtains valid data from 653 listed companies.
The study shows that, firstly, there is not any single factor as a necessary condition for SMEs to generate high-maturity digital transformation, which implies that the factors leading to the high-maturity digital transformation of SMEs are multiple and that there is a need to focus on the coordinated interaction between multiple factors. Secondly, two types of configuration paths lead to high-maturity digital transformation in private SMEs, namely, efficient adaptation and resource-capability coordination. Meanwhile, the resource-capability coordination type can be further refined into the resource-capability dominant type, the resource-capability coordination type under the dual assistance of government and market, and the resource-capability coordination type under the dual drive of government and industry. By comparing the four configuration paths of high-maturity digital transformation horizontally, it can be seen that enhancing enterprise adaptation capability plays a universal role in generating high-maturity digital transformation for small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises. Finally, the study also identifies four configuration paths that lead to non-high-maturity digital transformation in small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises, and through comparison, it is found that all four paths have weak digital resource infrastructure and insufficient adaptation capability, which belong to the "type of resource-capability deficiency".
This study adopts a combination of NCA and fsQCA to explore the complex causal mechanisms of the digital transformation of small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises, which enriches the qualitative and quantitative research on the digital transformation of SMEs. Meanwhile, different from previous studies, this paper innovatively constructs a research framework for the digital transformation of small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises based on the theory of the "strategic triangle", analyzing how factors at the level of "resource-industry-institution" coordination with each other to produce high-maturity digital transformation from the perspective of configuration. It also identifies a variety of configuration paths leading to high or non-high-maturity digital transformation in small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises, which provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for managers of small and medium-sized private manufacturing enterprises to formulate appropriate digital transformation routes rooted in their contexts.

Cite this article

Wang Ye , Jiang Zongzheng . Digital Transformation Path of Small and Medium-Sized Private Manufacturing Enterprises within the Framework of "Strategic Triangle"[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024 , 41(21) : 77 -86 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023060696

References

[1] 池毛毛, 叶丁菱, 王俊晶, 等. 我国中小制造企业如何提升新产品开发绩效——基于数字化赋能的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020,23(3):63-75.
[2] MARIA C A, FEDERICA B, ALBERTO M, et al. Is the trend your friend? an analysis of technology 4.0 investment decisions in agricultural SMEs[J]. Computers in Industry, 2019,109(41):59-71.
[3] WARNER K S R, WAEGER M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: an ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019,52(3):326-349.
[4] VIAL G. Understanding digital transformation:a review and a research agenda[J]. The journal of strategic information systems, 2019,28(2):118-144.
[5] ELLER R, ALFORD P, KALLMNZER A, et al. Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020,112(55):119-127.
[6] MATARAZZO M, PENCO L, PROFUMO G, et al. Digital transformation and customer value creation in made in Italy SMEs: a dynamic capabilities perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021,123(56):642-656.
[7] PENG M W, DENIS Y L W, YI J. An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2008,39(5):920-936.
[8] WANG C L, AHMED P K. Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007,9(1):31-51.
[9] 杨林, 和欣, 顾红芳. 高管团队经验、动态能力与企业战略突变:管理自主权的调节效应[J]. 管理世界, 2020,36(6):168-188.
[10] JAWORSKI B J, KOHLI A K. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1993,57(3):53-70.
[11] 樊纲, 王小鲁, 张立文, 等. 中国各地区市场化相对进程报告[J]. 经济研究, 2003,49(3):9-18.
[12] 董静, 余婕. 外层网络资源获取、制度环境与孵化器创新绩效研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020,37(10):1-10.
[13] 郭海, 王栋. 制度转型时期领导权结构与绩效关系实证研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2010,30(1):62-64.
[14] BOYD B K. CEO duality and firm performance: a contingency model[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16(4):301-312.
[15] 郭吉涛, 姚佳成. 数字经济与企业风险承担:管理自主权的调节效应[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022,24(1):83-91.
[16] 聂兴凯, 王稳华, 裴璇. 企业数字化转型会影响会计信息可比性吗[J]. 会计研究, 2022,43(5):17-39.
[17] 苏涛永, 孟丽. 企业战略激进度、管理者变更与技术距离[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022,39(1):89-98.
[18] FISS P C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011,54(2):393-420.
[19] JAN D, ERWIN V D L, ROELOF K. A Statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2020,23(2):385-395.
[20] 张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019,16(9):1312-1323.
Outlines

/