New quality productive forces are the inherent requirement and important focus for promoting high-quality economic and social development, and they put forward new requirements to construct a new model and new mechanism for the in-depth integration of scientific and technological innovation and industrial innovation.At present, the complexity of global science and technology innovation is getting higher and higher, and the competition system has shifted from single-point technology in the past to the competition of technological ecosystem, from the competition of application technology to the competition of basic research, and the cross-fertilization and convergence and integration between science and technology are accelerating the evolution.At the same time, a new round of industrial change led by digital science and technology has reached the "technological singularity" of application transformation, and frontier technologies such as general artificial intelligence, gene editing, brain-like science and technology, and quantum information are gradually moving towards the critical "window period" of technological life.Therefore, major scientific and technological research and breakthroughs in original technologies increasingly require in-depth cooperation, open synergy and cross-fertilization among multiple disciplines and multiple innovation subjects.How to strengthen the status of enterprises as the main body of scientific and technological innovation and play the role of innovation consortium as a "new quality carrier" has become an important issue to promote the in-depth integration of industry, academia and research, accelerate the transformation of scientific and technological achievements into real productivity, and develop the new quality of productive forces.
On the basis of the typical practice cases of innovation consortiumempowering new quality productive forces, this paper follows the ground theory to critically combs related classical theoretical literature, process data, and code the collected textual information step by step, mainly including open coding, main axial coding and selective coding, and refines the sub-category, main category and core category in order to identify the theoretical mechanism of the innovation consortium that empowers new quality productive forces.Against the backdrop of national "four oriented" major needs, the theoretical mechanism and practical path of innovation consortiumempowering new quality productivity are analyzed in depth from the "strategy-led + market-led + context-driven" perspective.
This study proposes a three-dimensional "strategy-led-market-oriented-context-driven" framework for innovation consortiumto empower new productive forces.Using the cases of Xiaomi, Huawei, and Baidu, it further analyzes the main practical paths for innovation consortiumto empower new productive forces, including (1) strengthening basic research and original technology curation to accelerate the cultivation of pioneering capabilities; (2) building high-energy innovation consortiums to accelerate the breakthrough of key core technologies; (3) accelerating the transformation of scientific and technological achievements into real-life productive forces according to diversified contexts; (4) strengthening the four-chain integration and empowerment to build a modernized industrial system; and (5) integrating "active government" and "effective market" to enhance the overall effectiveness of the national innovation system.
By revealing the theoretical mechanism and practical path of innovation consortium to empower new quality productive forces, this study provides an important theoretical basis and practical inspiration for the state and regions to efficiently coordinate and lay out industrial innovation consortium, promote industrial innovation through scientific and technological innovation, accelerate the cultivation and development of new quality productive forces.Firstly, major scientific and technological research should be carried out through innovation consortium to enhance the technological support capacity of industrial innovation and development.Secondly, innovation consortium should be utilized to promote the integration of industry, academia and research, and accelerate the transformation of scientific and technological achievements into real productive forces.Third, innovation consortium should be used to empower the industrial chain and innovation chain, and boost the construction of modernized industrial system.
Yuan Ye
,
Cao Qian
,
Yin Ximing
,
Chen Jin
. The Theoretical Mechanism and Practical Path of Innovation Consortium Empowering New Quality Productivity[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024
, 41(20)
: 32
-44
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.L2024XZ423
[1] 中国政府网.习近平在中共中央政治局第十一次集体学习时强调:加快发展新质生产力 扎实推进高质量发展[EB/OL].(2024-02-01)[2024-03-21].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202402/content_6929446.htm.
[2] 中国政府网.中央经济工作会议在北京举行 习近平发表重要讲话[EB/OL].(2023-12-12)[2024-03-21].https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202312/content_6919834.htm.
[3] 王滋,张树满.政产学研用深度融合如何系统突破关键核心技术[J].中国科技论坛,2023,39(6):75-85,107.
[4] U.S.Department of state.joint statement endorsing principles for 6g: secure, open, and resilient by design[EB/OL].(2024-02-26)[2024-03-27].https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/02/26/joint-statement-endorsing-principles-for-6g-secure-open-and-resilient-by-design/.
[5] 程京武.在推进中国式现代化建设中走在前列[J].红旗文稿,2023,60(14):35-38.
[6] 国家发展和改革委员会.加快发展新质生产力[EB/OL].(2024-03-01)[2024-03-21].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/wsdwhfz/202403/t20240301_1364322.html.
[7] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯文集:第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:698.
[8] 李政,廖晓东.发展“新质生产力”的理论、历史和现实“三重”逻辑[J].政治经济学评论,2023,14(6):146-159.
[9] 陈劲,朱子钦.以新技术、新产业驱动新质生产力[J].经济,2024,36(1):22-24.
[10] 张越,余江,杨娅,等.颠覆性技术驱动的未来产业培育模式与路径研究——美国布局下一代集成电路产业的启示[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(6):895-906.
[11] 赵峰,季雷.新质生产力的科学内涵、构成要素和制度保障机制[J].学习与探索,2024,46(1):92-101,175.
[12] 蒲清平.加快形成新质生产力的着力点[J].人民论坛,2023,32(21):34-37.
[13] 钞小静,王清.新质生产力驱动高质量发展的逻辑与路径[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(1):12-20.
[14] 白京羽,刘中全,王颖婕.基于博弈论的创新联合体动力机制研究[J].科研管理,2020,41(10):105-113.
[15] 郭菊娥,王梦迪,冷奥琳.企业布局搭建创新联合体重塑创新生态的机理与路径研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2022,42(1):76-84.
[16] ARORA A, BELENZON S, PATACCONI A.Knowledge sharing in alliances and alliance portfolios[J].Management Science, 2021, 67(3): 1569-1585.
[17] 张羽飞,孙祺,李桂荣,等.产学研深度融合创新联合体:概念衍生、特征类型与推进路径[J/OL].科技进步与对策:1-11[2024-03-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20240226.0928.006.html.
[18] 尹西明,陈泰伦,陈劲,等.面向科技自立自强的高能级创新联合体建设[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,51(2):51-60.
[19] VONORTAS N S.Research joint ventures in the US[J].Research Policy, 1997, 26(4-5): 577-595.
[20] 科技部.关于推动产业技术创新战略联盟构建的指导意见[EB/OL].(2009-02-21)[2024-03-14].https://www.most.gov.cn/szyw/yw/200902/t20090220_67551.html.
[21] 解学梅,王宏伟.产业技术创新战略联盟稳定性影响机制研究——一个合作机制视角的多案例探索性分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(3):62-71.
[22] SU Y S, ZHENG Z X, CHEN J.A multi-platform collaboration innovation ecosystem: the case of China[J].Management Decision, 2018, 56(1): 125-142.
[23] 陈良华,何帅,李宛.新型科研机构的本质特征与运行机制[J].江苏社会科学,2023,44(3):148-158,243-244.
[24] BLIND K, MANGELSDORF A.Motives to standardize: empirical evidence from Germany[J].Technovation, 2016, 48: 13-24.
[25] 陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2000: 335.
[26] PANDIT N R.The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method[J].The Qualitative Report, 1996, 2(4): 1-15.
[27] 谭劲松,宋娟,陈晓红.产业创新生态系统的形成与演进:“架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J].管理世界,2021,37(9):167-191.
[28] 李林,彭方雪,何建洪,等.“一带一路”共建国家间的技术扩散——基于技术内容与网络结构的分析[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2024,36(2):135-145.
[29] 马文君,蔡跃洲.新一代信息技术能否成为动力变革的重要支撑——基于新兴产业分类与企业数据挖掘的实证分析[J].改革,2020,33(2):40-56.
[30] 习近平.在中国科学院第十九次院士大会、中国工程院第十四次院士大会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2018-05-29(002).
[31] 尹西明,陈劲,刘畅.科技领军企业:定义、分类评价与促进对策[J].创新科技,2021,21(6):1-8.
[32] 新华社.习近平主持召开新时代推动中部地区崛起座谈会强调 在更高起点上扎实推动中部地区崛起[EB/OL].(2024-03-20)[2024-03-22].http://www.news.cn/20240320/48c5691a62b64bbdaf8ec51f15f07143/c.html.
[33] 陈劲,尹西明,陈泰伦,等.有组织创新:全面提升国家创新体系整体效能的战略与进路[J].中国软科学,2024,39(3):1-14.
[34] 唐任伍,温馨,武天鑫.国家创新体系的数字化重构——新型举国体制驱动的机理与路径[J].经济与管理研究,2024,45(1):3-15.