Since the signing of the Paris Agreement, global climate governance has entered a new stage, and some governments have been actively deepening international cooperation to promote global green and sustainable development. Green finance is a new financial model that combines environmental protection with economic profits, playing a significant role in environmental governance. In this context, green finance policies have greater impacts on the financial costs of high-pollution and high-energy-consumption enterprises with two mechanisms of action; on the one hand, green finance policies directly raise the financial threshold for high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises, increasing their debt financing costs; on the other hand, these enterprises can establish good social images through green technology innovation and green information disclosure, which not only helps to gain the favor of investors but also obtain green financial policy support, and to some extent alleviates their costs of debt financing. The purpose of this study is to explore the mechanism and effectiveness of green finance policies, for it would be conducive to improving China's green finance policy system and guiding the green transformation and upgrading of high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises, thus providing important theoretical and practical significance for China's green transformation.#br#The current research on green finance policies has some inadequacies. Firstly, the existing literature assumes that green finance policies increase the difficulty of financing for high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises, thus increasing their total financial costs. In fact, this confuses the total quantity effect and cost effect. Secondly, the existing research ignores the strategic behavior of high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises. Enterprises can take "signaling warfare" to deal with the impact of adverse policies on their financing costs, such as reducing their external financing costs by creating adverse selection through environmental disclosure. Furthermore, the role of green finance policies is a dynamic process, and the policies themselves are committed to stimulating green technology innovation and achieving green transformation in enterprises. After the transformation, the financing costs of enterprises have been significantly reduced, and thus relevant research is insufficient.#br#Following the theory of incomplete information dynamic game, this study reveals the relationship between strategic behavior and financing activities of high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises against the backdrop of green finance policies. Green finance policies can trigger "signal warfare" and green innovation behavior of enterprises, forming multiple Nash equilibria, and having different impacts on the financing of high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises. In order to verify the correctness of the theory, on the basis of the relevant data of 537 listed companies, this paper adopts the chain mediation effect model to examine the impact of green financial policies on the financial costs of high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises. The study finds that green financial policies can not only directly alleviate the financing costs of high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises, but also play the mediating role of environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation. Then, the three indirect paths of environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation as chain mediators reduce their financing costs.#br#This study provides a new perspective for the study of the mechanism of green finance policy, and suggestions for policy improvement are presented. First, the environmental protection department should establish environmental information review agencies which are expected to collect and evaluate the environmental information disclosed by high-energy-consumption and high-pollution enterprises, and then issue relevant evaluation reports. The review of environmental information by third-party institutions and the issuance of relevant reports are conducive to reducing information asymmetry and improving transaction efficiency in the capital market. Second, the government should establish an incentive mechanism for promoting green innovation through the joint participation of the government, enterprises, and the public by making favorable policies to attract and cultivate elite talent, improving the intellectual property protection system, and increasing public awareness and understanding of green innovation. Third, for the enterprises with green innovation capabilities but insufficient R&D investment, the government should establish special funds to support these enterprises and expand their financing channels.#br#
Meng Dabin
,
Li Xinyu
,
Li Lei
. Green Finance Policy and High-Energy-Consumption and High-Pollution Enterprise Financing Costs: The Mediating Response of Green Innovation in the Signaling Game[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024
, 41(18)
: 23
-32
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023040174
[1] ZENG YITING,WANG FENG,WU JUN. The impact of green finance on urban haze pollution in China: a technological innovation perspective[J].Energies, 2022,15(3): 1-20.
[2] 陈国进,丁赛杰,赵向琴,等.中国绿色金融政策、融资成本与企业绿色转型——基于央行担保品政策视角[J].金融研究,2021,44(12):75-95.
[3] 曾惠芝.绿色金融、碳减排与企业融资成本[J].内蒙古财经大学学报,2022,20(1):103-107.
[4] 代昀昊,赵煜航,雷怡雯.绿色金融政策会提高企业债务融资成本吗[J]. 证券市场导报,2023,33(4):33-43.
[5] KARTHIK B, MARY B B, BRYAN K, et al. Shaping liquidity: on the causal effects of voluntary disclosure[J]. Journal of Finance, 2014, 69(5): 2237-2278.
[6] 廖民超,金佳敏,蒋玉石,等.数字平台能力与制造业服务创新绩效——网络能力和价值共创的链式中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(5):55-63.
[7] 牛海鹏,张夏羿,张平淡.我国绿色金融政策的制度变迁与效果评价——以绿色信贷的实证研究为例[J].管理评论,2020,32(8):3-12.
[8] 吴海波,姚洪兴.银企信贷中外源性R&D投入与企业创新能力评价体系局限性研究——基于动态博弈视角[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(16):136-140.
[9] 杜建国,马浩文,金帅.上市公司环境信息披露与公众投资者的演化博弈分析[J].工业技术经济,2017,36(1):152-160.
[10] 肖仁桥,王冉,钱丽.数字化水平对企业碳绩效的非线性影响——绿色技术创新的中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(5):96-106.
[11] 江静.融资约束与中国企业储蓄率:基于微观数据的考察[J].管理世界,2014,30(8):18-29.
[12] 毛捷,管星华.地方政府纾困、融资成本与企业业绩分化[J].经济与管理评论,2021,37(5):54-67.
[13] 邹颖,汪平,张丽敏.中国上市公司资本成本的理性估算与国际比较[J].世界经济文汇,2017,61(1):1-25.
[14] 姜启波,谭清美.政府创新补贴影响企业创新的非动态门槛效应研究——基于创业板上市公司融资约束视角[J]. 经济经纬, 2020, 37(6): 97-105.
[15] 许林,林思宜,钱淑芳.环境信息披露、绿色技术创新对融资约束的缓释效应[J].证券市场导报,2021,31(9):23-33.
[16] 孙志红,陆阿会.环境规制、绿色金融与环保企业投资[J].金融发展研究,2021,40(1):22-28.
[17] 胡海波,费梅菊,王怡琴,等.绿色转型情境下企业绿色创新实现过程——正邦案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(5):84-95.
[18] 杨熠,李余晓璐,沈洪涛.绿色金融政策、公司治理与企业环境信息披露——以502家重污染行业上市公司为例[J].财贸研究,2011,22(5):131-139.
[19] 吴卫红,刘金金,张爱美,等.绿色关注与企业绿色创新:高质量发展导向下数字商业模式场景研究[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(10):1-12.
[20] 赵鑫,杨棉之,曹迅. 国有股权参与、吸收能力与民营企业绿色技术创新——一个有调节的中介效应模型[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(7):1-11.
[21] 王小君.上市公司股权融资成本影响因素分析[J].合作经济与科技,2018,34(7):38-50.
[22] 苏利平,张慧敏.政府监管、环境信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J].会计之友,2020,38(23):80-87.
[23] 柳学信,杜肖璇,孔晓旭,等.碳信息披露水平、股权融资成本与企业价值[J].技术经济,2021,40(8):116-125.
[24] 李万超,柴尚蕾,张宏燕,等.绿色信贷政策下环境信息披露对企业新增银行贷款与债务融资成本的影响研究[J].金融理论与实践,2022,43(4):19-28.
[25] 杜江,龚新蜀.能效“领跑者”制度与企业绿色创新——政府生态环境注意力及高管环保经历的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(4):141-150.
[26] 王保辉.绿色信贷、企业社会责任披露与债务融资成本——基于2011—2017年A股上市重污染企业的实证研究[J].金融理论与实践,2019,40(7):47-54.
[27] 张颖,吴桐.绿色信贷对上市公司信贷融资成本的影响——基于双重差分模型的估计[J].金融与经济,2018,39(12):8-12.