It is crucial to build an ecologically suitable regional innovation ecosystem against the imbalanced spatial pattern and uncoordinated development of regional innovation in China.#br#Gathering global innovation elements to construct an efficient self-organizing evolution innovation ecosystem has become an important way for regional innovation development. In recent years, with the rapid development of the digital economy, the wide application of digital technology has accelerated the reconstruction of regional and global economic patterns. Regional digital transformation driven by new-generation information technology such as big data and cloud computing has created an innovation ecosystem in the new era of the digital economy. The success of digital transformation is the key to the vigorous development of the digital economy and an important support for the stable and coordinated development of regional innovation ecosystems. However, the development of regional innovation ecosystems and innovation activities still faces multi-dimensional challenges,such as data collection, technology integration, talent supply, research and development costs, and data security. The impact mechanism of digital transformation on regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness is not clear, and it is of practical significance to explore the interaction between them. Meanwhile, industrial convergence has become a new trend of modern industrial development in digital transformation; as an important driving force for the growth of traditional industries and a new economic growth point, it plays a key role in promoting the formation and evolution of regional innovation ecosystems. In this process, the institutional environment plays an important role in ensuring and supporting regional innovation.#br#Drawing on the panel data of 30 provinces (autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government) in China, excluding Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan,and Tibet, from 2008 to 2021, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of digital transformation on regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness and brings industrial convergence and institutional environment into the research model as mediating variables and moderating variables to analyze the interaction mechanism between them. The results show that, first of all, digital transformation has a significant positive impact on regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness; that is, the greater the degree of regional digital transformation, the more conducive to regional innovation, which is conducive to the development of the regional innovation ecosystem ecological niche in a more appropriate direction. Among them, the impact of digital transformation in the eastern region on regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness is significantly greater than that in the central and western regions. This is because the development level of the digital economy in the eastern region is relatively high, and thus it can better play the role of digital transformation in optimizing the regional innovation ecosystem's niche fitness. Secondly, industrial convergence plays a mediating role between digital transformation and regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness. Digital transformation can promote regional industrial convergence, and industrial convergence is conducive to the improvement of regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness. Finally, the institutional environment has a significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between digital transformation and regional innovation ecosystem ecological niche suitability. A good institutional environment can ensure the smooth promotion of digital transformation, which is more conducive to the enhancement of regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness through digital transformation.#br#Compared with existing studies, this paper empirically analyzes the relationship between digital transformation and regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness, and makes up for the lack of quantitative analysis in this field. Secondly, industrial convergence and institutional environment are included in the research framework of the relationship between digital transformation and regional innovation ecosystem niche fitness, and the mediating effect and regulatory effect of industrial convergence and institutional environment in this impact process are discussed, which enriches the existing theoretical research framework. Combined with the research conclusions, this paper puts forward policy suggestions on how to strengthen the digital transformation to enable the stable development of regional innovation ecosystem, providing reference for the coordinated innovation and high-quality development of different regions in China.#br#
He Wei
,
Dong Ying
,
Lyu Jingwen
. The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Niche Fitness of Regional Innovation Ecosystem[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024
, 41(17)
: 22
-31
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023020266
[1] 王海花,周洁,郭建杰,等.区域创新生态系统适宜度、双元网络与创新绩效——一个有调节的中介[J].管理评论, 2023,35(3):83-91.
[2] 王德起,何皛彦,吴件.京津冀区域创新生态系统:运行机理及效果评价[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(10): 53-61.
[3] 田秀娟,李睿.数字技术赋能实体经济转型发展——基于熊彼特内生增长理论的分析框架[J].管理世界, 2022,38(5):56-74.
[4] VALDEZ-DE-LEON O . A Digital maturity model for telecommunications service providers[J]. Technology Innovation Management Review,2016,6(8):19-32.
[5] LI L,SU F,ZHANG W,et al.Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: a capability perspective[J]. Information Systems Journal,2018,28(6):1129-1157.
[6] SEO D.Digital business convergence and emerging contested fields:a conceptual framework[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,2017,18 (10):687-702.
[7] 韩璐,陈松,梁玲玲.数字经济、创新环境与城市创新能力[J].科研管理,2021,42(4):35-45.
[8] 徐向龙,侯经川.促进、加速与溢出:数字经济发展对区域创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(1): 50-59.
[9] 闵路路,许正中.数字经济、创新绩效与经济高质量发展——基于中国城市的经验证据[J].统计与决策, 2022, 38(3): 11-15.
[10] 王家庭,袁春来,马宁.数字经济发展对产业结构、产业效率的影响:来自省级层面的经验证据[J].中国科技论坛,2022,20(12):117-127.
[11] 李齐,曹胜,吴文怡.中国治理数字化转型的系统论阐释:样态和路径[J].中国行政管理, 2020,22(10): 44-51.
[12] 张文静.“互联网+基层治理”:以数字化手段推进整体性治理[J].领导科学, 2020,36(10):30-32.
[13] 马健.产业融合理论研究评述[J].经济学动态,2002,43(5):78-81.
[14] 赵玉林,汪美辰.产业融合、产业集聚与区域产业竞争优势提升——基于湖北省先进制造业产业数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(3):26-32.
[15] ADNER,RON.Ecosystem as structure[J].Journal of Management,2017,43(1):39-58.
[16] 周明生,张一兵.数字技术发展促进制造业与服务业融合了吗[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(13):74-82.
[17] 李海舰,赵丽.数据成为生产要素:特征、机制与价值形态演进[J].上海经济研究,2021,38(8):48-59.
[18] 卢现祥.论产权制度、要素市场与高质量发展[J].经济纵横,2020,36(1):65-73.
[19] TED O DONOGHUE,JOSEF ZWEIMULLER.Patents in a model of endogenous growth[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,2004, 9(1):81-123.
[20] 陈志勇,陈思霞.制度环境、地方政府投资冲动与财政预算软约束[J].经济研究,2014,49(3):76-87.
[21] ACEMOGLU D,JOHNSON S,ROBINSON J.Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth[R]. NBER Working Papers,2004:10481.
[22] 杜两省,胡海洋,姚晨.制度环境、技术创新资本流动与区域发展——基于空间集聚视角的研究[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2020,41(2):142-151.
[23] 甄美荣,江晓壮,杨晶照.国家级高新区创新生态系统适宜度与经济绩效测度[J].统计与决策,2020,36(13): 67-72.
[24] 覃荔荔,王道平,周超.综合生态位适宜度在区域创新系统可持续性评价中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(5):927-935.
[25] 武翠,谭清美.基于生态位适宜度的区域创新生态系统与产业协同集聚研究[J].科技管理研究, 2021, 41 (3):1-9.
[26] 武晓婷,张恪渝.数字经济产业与制造业融合测度——基于投入产出视角[J].中国流通经济, 2021,35 (11): 89-98.
[27] 苏永伟.生产性服务业与制造业融合水平测度研究——基于2005—2018年的省级面板数据[J].宏观经济研究,2020,23(12):98-108.
[28] 樊纲,王小鲁,马光荣.中国市场化进程对经济增长的贡献[J].经济研究,2011,46(9):4-16.
[29] 庄旭东,王仁曾.市场化进程、数字化转型与区域创新能力——理论分析与经验证据[J].科技进步与对策, 2022,39(7):44-52.