With the rapid development of digital intelligence technology,the transformation of digital intelligence has become an inevitable choice for the development of manufacturing enterprises in the era of the digital economy. In this context,the ability to integrate digital intelligence technology and other resources of the enterprise has become the key to gaining a sustainable competitive advantage. Companies need to use digital intelligence technology to integrate digital intelligence production factors into the way they do business and transform digital intelligence production factors into digital intelligence capabilities. However,due to the lack of directional guidance for the construction of digital intelligence capability,some manufacturing enterprises are caught in the dilemma of "not transforming and waiting for death,or seeking death through transformation" ,and it is urgent to carry out in-depth research on the connotation and structure of digital intelligence capability from an academic point of view.#br#Following the dynamic resource-based view and the similar concept of digital intelligence capability,this paper defines the digital intelligence capability of manufacturing enterprises as the innovative capability of manufacturing enterprises to integrate and apply digital intelligence technologies such as big data,cloud computing and artificial intelligence in their R&D,production and sales activities,and to realize the digital intelligence of production and operation through the connection and configuration of internal and external resources such as digital intelligence technologies and data and information. Then,it explores the structural dimensions of digital intelligence capabilities of manufacturing companies using the qualitative research method of grounded theory and develops its scale. The paper follows the sampling principles of qualitative research to select the sample and conducts semi-structured interviews with 31 middle and senior managers and 23 employees from the selected manufacturing companies. The obtained textual information is tested by open coding,axial coding and selective coding,as well as theoretical saturation,and it is concluded that the digital intelligence capability of manufacturing enterprises consists of three dimensions: production intelligence capability,digital intelligence operation capability and digital intelligence connection capability. Finally,the initial scale of 19 measurement items is developed based on the connotations of each dimension. Drawing on the existing literature,the study revises the initial scale according to the experts' opinions. It strictly follows the scale development steps and constructs a digital intelligence capability index system consisting of 3 dimensions and 16 questions based on exploratory factor analysis for manufacturing enterprises. Through quantitative analysis of reliability and validity tests,the study confirms the good discriminant and convergent validity of the scale.#br#Different from the existing literature,this study clarifies the connotation and extension of digital intelligence capabilities in manufacturing enterprises through an in-depth interpretation of digital intelligence capabilities from a dynamic resource-based perspective and on the basis of comparison with other related concepts. Furthermore,grounded theory is used to dig deeper into the structural dimensions of digital intelligence capabilities,bridging the gap for previous studies merely focused on similar conceptual dimensions of numerical intelligence capabilities. It highlights that,compared to the digital capability,the digital intelligence capability pays more attention to the ecological scale of the industry chain and the depth of cooperation between enterprises,which expands the boundaries of the concept of enterprise digital intelligence capability. Finally,the digital intelligence capability scale for manufacturing companies developed in this study provides an effective measurement tool for the quantitative study of companies' digital intelligence capabilities. The development of this scale makes up for the shortcomings of the previous quantitative research on numerical intelligence ability,promotes the transformation of numerical intelligence ability from conceptual discussion to empirical research,lays a good foundation for further research on the paths and mechanisms of numerical intelligence ability enhancement,and promotes in-depth research on digital intelligence capability.#br#
Zhang Le
,
Chen Juhong
,
Dong Hailin
,
Wang Hao
. Digital Intelligence Capability of Manufacturing Enterprises:Dimension Exploration and Scale Development[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024
, 41(11)
: 79
-88
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2023010267
[1] 陈剑,刘运辉.数智化使能运营管理变革:从供应链到供应链生态系统[J].管理世界,2021,37(11):227-240,14.
[2] CHAUDHURI A,SUBRAMANIAN N,DORA M. Circular economy and digital capabilities of SMEs for providing value to customers: combined resource-based view and ambidexterity perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research,2022,142(3):32-44.
[3] HELFAT C E,PETERAF M A. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10): 997-1010.
[4] PARIDA V,SJODIN D R,LENKA S,et al. Developing global service innovation capabilities: how global manufacturers address the challenges of market heterogeneity[J]. Research Technology management,2015,58(5): 35-44.
[5] CALLE A D L,FREIJE I,UGARTE J V,et al. Measuring the impact of digital capabilities on product-service innovation in Spanish industries[J]. International Journal of Business Environment,2020,11(3): 254-274.
[6] ARDOLINO M,RAPACCINI M,SACCANI N,et al. The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2018,56(6): 2116-2132.
[7] 张志学,赵曙明,连汇文,等.数智时代的自我管理和自我领导:现状与未来[J].外国经济与管理,2021,43(11):3-14.
[8] 金华,陈佳鹏,黄匡时.新业态下数智化劳动:平台规训、风险生成与政策因应[J].电子政务,2022,19(2):75-87.
[9] 陈畴镛,许敬涵.制造企业数字化转型能力评价体系及应用[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(11):46-51.
[10] ROSS J W,BEATH C M,GOODHUE D L.Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets[J]. Sloan Management Review,1996,38(1): 31-42.
[11] 吴晓波,胡保亮,蔡荃.运用信息技术能力获取竞争优势的框架与路径研究[J].科研管理,2006,26(5):53-58.
[12] 张振刚,张君秋,陈一华.资源协奏视角下大数据赋能精益生产的机理研究[J].管理案例研究与评论,2022,15(1):85-98.
[13] LIN C,KUNNATHUR A. Strategic orientations,developmental culture,and big data capability[J]. Journal of Business Research,2019,105(16): 49-60.
[14] CHEN D Q,PRESTON D S,SWINK M. How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2015,32(4): 4-39.
[15] 马鸿佳,肖彬,王春蕾.大数据能力影响因素及效用:基于元分析的研究[J].南开管理评论,2021,40(10):1-19.
[16] LYYTINEN K,YOO Y,BOLAND JR R J. Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks[J]. Information Systems Journal,2016,26(1): 47-75.
[17] 吉峰,贾学迪,林婷婷.制造企业数字化能力的概念及其结构维度——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(5):151-166.
[18] SJODIN D R,PARIDA V,KOHTAMAKI M,et al. Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis[J].Journal of Business Research,2016,69(11): 5330-5335.
[19] 孙建军,李阳,裴雷.“数智”赋能时代图情档变革之思考[J].图书情报知识,2020,195(3):22-27.
[20] 刘平峰,王雨婷,苏超超.大数据赋能企业知识管理创新机理与路径研究——基于华为案例 [J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(1):122-131.
[21] 郑勇华,孙延明,尹剑峰.智能化转型、智能化能力与制造企业转型绩效——战略匹配的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(18):99-109.
[22] KAPLAN A,HAENLEIN M.Siri,siri,in my hand:who′s the fairest in the land? on the interpretations,illustrations,and implications of artificial intelligence[J].Business Horizons,2019,62(1):15-25.
[23] LENKA S,PARIDA V,WINCENT J. Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms[J]. Psychology & Marketing,2017,34(1): 92-100.
[24] 易加斌,徐迪,王宇婷,等.学习导向、大数据能力与商业模式创新:产业类型的调节效应[J].管理评论,2021,33(12):137-151.
[25] ANWAR M,KHAN S Z,SHAH S Z A. Big data capabilities and firm′s performance: a mediating role of competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management,2018,17(4): 1850045.
[26] BARNEY J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management,1991,17(1): 99-120.