Along with the promotion of global standardization and the increasing varieties among overseas market participants, international technical standards (ITS) gradually become the primary benchmark for consumers to identify and select products.Currently, the key task for the high-quality development of Chinese enterprises in overseas markets is to explore the driving forces of their overseas market expansion from the perspective of ITS and then optimize the corresponding competitive strategies.It has been pointed out in relevant studies that the enterprises that have participated in the ITS establishment are more capable of realizing network effects, expanding patent benefits, and shaping corporate images, which demonstrates the importance of estimating the performance differences in the overseas market from the perspective of ITS establishment.Moreover, participation in the ITS establishment is the core to determining whether enterprises can integrate into the operation of ITS and provides guidance for strategy selection and behavior adjustment in the overseas market expansion.Therefore, this paper regards ITS as a new driving force for Chinese enterprises to expand overseas markets and clarifies the significant effects of participation in the ITS establishment on the enterprises’ performance in overseas markets, which provides a reference for Chinese enterprises in the integration of the ITS establishment and overseas market expansion and the enhancement of global competitiveness.#br#Drawing on the panel data of China A-share listed companies participating in the ITS establishment from 2012 to 2020, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of ITS participation on the performance of enterprises in overseas markets.To strengthen the breadth and representativeness of the sample, this paper selects the enterprises participating in the ITS establishment in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) as the research objects.ISO and IEC are responsible for international standardization activities in most fields in the world such that they have a deep connection with the performance of enterprises in overseas markets.The list of Chinese institutions that participated in the ITS establishment of ISO and IEC from 2012 to 2020 is obtained from the National Standards Committee, and matched with the basic data and financial data of enterprises from Flush Database and CSMAR Database.According to the enterprise's ITS establishment and overseas market performance data, the theoretical hypothesis is tested by propensity score matching, multi-period double difference method, and Heckman's two-stage model.#br#The main conclusions are drawn from three aspects.(1) Participation in the ITS establishment has a positive impact on enhancing the depth of overseas markets for enterprises.(2) Compared with following the ITS establishment, leading the ITS establishment extends the depth of overseas markets for enterprises.(3) Compared with leading the ITS establishment, following the ITS establishment expands the breadth of overseas markets for enterprises.The conclusion deepens the theoretical explanation of technical standards internationalization and broadens the research view of the relationship between the ITS establishment and the performance of enterprises in overseas markets.Moreover, it provides useful inspiration for the internationalization of technical standards of Chinese enterprises and the adjustment of overseas market strategies.First, enterprises focusing on overseas market business development should actively participate in the formulation of ITS and strive to enhance the legitimacy of integrating into the formulation of ITS.Second, enterprises that are devoted to developing specific overseas markets need to pay particular attention to obtaining the leading position in the formulation of ITS.On the one hand, they should establish a standard construction framework centered on their own technological operations, and make technology transformation models and diverse knowledge fusion systems suitable for enterprises to lead the formulation of ITS.On the other hand, for enterprises that lead the formulation of ITS, it is essential to optimize the competitive environment by formulating patent licensing strategies that are suitable for the development stage of overseas market business, and make a product life cycle model with a focus on enterprise patents.Finally, enterprises need to adopt reasonable strategies following international technical standards in order to achieve the leading position in the formulation of ITS.#br#
Zhou Qing
,
Chen Peifu
,
Wang Li
,
Yang Wei
. The Effect of International Technical Standards Establishment on Enterprise Overseas Market Performance[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024
, 41(8)
: 96
-105
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022110636
[1] BLIND K, MANGELSDORF A. Alliance formation of SMEs: empirical evidence from standardization committees[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2012, 60(1): 148-156.
[2] 侯俊军,蒋晴. 中国标准的输出与国际经济合作[J]. 国际经济合作,2015,31(5):12-16.
[3] 宋明顺,张华. 专利标准化对国际贸易作用的机理研究及实证——基于标准与国际贸易关系研究现状[J]. 国际贸易问题,2012,38(2):92-100.
[4] 刘淑春,林汉川. 我国制造业标准国际化战略对策[J]. 宏观质量研究,2020,8(6):80-95.
[5] 任鸽,陈伟宏,钟熙. 高管国际经验、环境不确定性与企业国际化进程[J]. 外国经济与管理,2019,41(9):109-121.
[6] 董临萍,宋渊洋. 高管团队注意力与企业国际化绩效:权力与管理自由度的调节作用[J]. 管理评论,2017,29(8):167-178.
[7] 汪涛,贾煜,崔朋朋,等. 外交关系如何影响跨国企业海外市场绩效[J]. 中国工业经济,2020,37(7):80-97.
[8] 凌艳平,辛晓丹,侯俊军. 企业参与制定国家标准对其出口贸易规模的影响——基于上市公司数据的实证研究[J]. 财经理论与实践,2017,38(1):134-138.
[9] DAI H, ZENG D, QUALLS W J, et al. Do social ties matter for the emergence of dominant design? the moderating roles of technological turbulence and IRP enforcement[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2018, 47: 96-109.
[10] MANGELSDORF A. The role of technical standards for trade between China and the European Union[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2011, 23(7): 725-743.
[11] GANDAL N, SHY O. Standardization policy and international trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2001, 53(2): 363-383.
[12] BALLER S. Trade effects of regional standards liberalization: a heterogeneous firms approach[M]. Washington,DC:World Bank Publications, 2007.
[13] MOENIUS J. The good, the bad and the ambiguous: standards and trade in agricultural products[C].IATRC Summer Symposium,2006: 28-30.
[14] HUSSINGER K, SCHWIEBACHER F. The market value of technology disclosures to standard setting organizations[J].Industry and Innovation, 2015, 22(4): 321-344.
[15] 邢孝兵,徐洁香. 技术标准化的贸易保护效应[J].国际经贸探索,2010,26(6):24-30.
[16] 程虹,刘芸. 市场经济中的标准秩序理论研究[J].宏观质量研究,2017,5(4):1-17.
[17] KWAK J, LEE H. The evolution of alliance structure in China's mobile telecommunication industry and implications for international standardization[J].Telecommunications Policy, 2012, 36(10-11): 966-976.
[18] 禹献云,李庆华. 破坏性创新、知识网络与企业成长的动态关联[J].信息与管理研究,2020,5(Z1):10-21.
[19] 邹思明,曾德明,张利飞,等. 网络关系, 技术多元化与企业技术标准化能力[J].科研管理,2017,38(9):12-20.
[20] 孙耀吾,蒋文兵. 基于技术标准的企业国际化路径选择研究[J].华东经济管理,2013,27(6):118-122.
[21] VIALLE P, SONG J, ZHANG J. Competing with dominant global standards in a catching-up context——the case of mobile standards in China[J].Telecommunications Policy, 2012, 36(10-11): 832-846.
[22] 谢芳,潘家栋,包海波. 基于联盟的数字产业技术标准国际化路径研究——以昕诺飞为例[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(18):50-59.
[23] RANGANATHAN R, GHOSH A, ROSENKOPF L. Competition-cooperation interplay during multi-firm technology coordination: the effect of firm heterogeneity on conflict and consensus in a technology standards organization[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(12): 3193-3221.
[24] 谢文栋. 科技金融政策能否提升科技人才集聚水平——基于多期DID的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(20):131-140.
[25] 舒辉,高璐. 专利与技术标准协同转化的核心问题分析[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(21):111-116.
[26] WIEGMANN P M, DE VRIES H J, BLIND K. Multi-mode standardisation: a critical review and a research agenda[J].Research Policy, 2017, 46(8): 1370-1386.
[27] 王彦芳,陈淑梅. 国际标准对于中间品贸易的影响研究—来自ISO9001的经验证据[J].国际经贸探索,2017,33(7):45-59.
[28] 陈立敏. 国际化战略与企业绩效关系的争议——国际研究评述[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(5):112-125,160.
[29] ORTIZ-DE-MANDOJANA N, BANSAL P. The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(8): 1615-1631.
[30] MAO D F, LI J, PENG F, et al. R&D input and cooperate TFP: an empirical test based on PSM and GPM methods[J].Journal of Finance and Economics, 2013,4: 134-144.
[31] 司春晓,孙诗怡,罗长远.自贸区的外资创造和外资转移效应:基于倾向得分匹配-双重差分法(PSM-DID)的研究[J].世界经济研究,2021,44(5):9-23.
[32] KASIRI L A, CHENG K T G, SAMBASIVAN M, et al. Integration of standardization and customization: impact on service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty[J].Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2017,35: 91-97.
[33] JEONG I, KIM E, SEO E. An empirical study of the relationship between marketing standardization and performance of Japanese firms in international markets: the moderating role of product strategy[J].International Journal of Marketing & Distribution, 2018, 2(1): 15-24.
[34] 刘淑春.技术标准化、标准国际化与中国装备制造走出去[J].浙江社会科学,2018,34(8):16-26.