Digital Innovation and Digital Transformation Column

Enterprise Digital Transformation, Managers' Time Orientation and Core-technology Competence:An Inverted U-shape

  • Lu Ren ,
  • Zhao Xiangying ,
  • Lyu Daguo
Expand
  • (1. School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China;2. Institute of Finance and Public Management, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 233030, China)

Received date: 2022-11-14

  Revised date: 2023-02-13

  Online published: 2024-04-10

Abstract

In the era of digital technology, digital transformation has become a necessary approach for enterprises to improve core-technology competence. From a micro perspective, digital transformation not only provides enterprises with means and tools to develop core-technology competence, but also provides new business scenarios for enterprises;from a macro perspective,it helps Chinese enterprises to further open the international market and cultivate the technological advantages in some high-tech fields by embracing digital technology and carrying out digital transformation. Thus, it is of significance to systematically and comprehensively explore how digital transformation helps enterprises enhance their core-technology competence. Existing studies mainly focus on the linear relationship between digital transformation and enterprise performance, and some studies note that carrying out digital transformation improves enterprise performance, while other studies argue that digital transformation hinders enterprise performance. The controversy raises the question of whether there is a non-linear relationship between digital transformation and enterprise performance. #br#This paper aims to fill in the above-mentioned research gap by verifying that the relationship between digital transformation and core-technology competence is an inverted U-shape. Drawing on Hanns et al.’s research template, it builds a theoretical framework that deconstructs the inverted U-shape into two forces, namely the driving force and the blocking force. The driving force promotes the improvement of core-technology competence through the search and recombination of information, the coordination of multi-tasks, and organizational structure changes. The blocking force, in contrast, decreases the enterprises' core-technology competence in three dimensions of cost saving, talent recruitment and distraction. By integrating the driving force and blocking force, the inverted U-shape relationship between digital transformation and core-technology competence is formed. Furthermore, because managers usually play a decisive role in whether to conduct digital transformation and control the process of digital transformation;managers’ time orientation which includes forward-lookingness and myopia uncovers managers' thoughts about the enterprise development in the short and long term, it is necessary to include managers' time orientation in the theoretical framework of this paper.#br#With the help of existing text data in the annual reports of listed companies, word frequency is used to estimate enterprise digital transformation, managerial forward-lookingness and myopia. In the calculation of the core-technology competence of enterprises using the revealed technology advantage index, three more indicators are added, namely the average cited number of enterprise patents, the average number of claims of patent rights, and the average quality of patents. The four-dimensional index is then built, and by applying the entropy method, the core-technology competence is calculated. Using the fixed-effect model and instrumental variable method, this paper studies 9 491 observations of 2 182 listed companies from 2010 to 2019. The result shows that there exists an inverted U-shaped relationship between enterprise digital transformation and core-technology competence, and several robustness tests and endogeneity tests reconfirm the conclusion;the managerial forward-lookingness strengthens this relationship, implying that managerial forward-lookingness significantly promotes the core-technology competence and makes the curve steeper;while the managerial myopia weakens the relationship, indicating that managers' myopia has negative effects on the core-technology competence and makes the curve flatter.#br#Digital transformation is not a panacea for strengthening enterprise core-technology competence. Managers should implement digital transformation moderately to attain optimal core-technology competence. In addition, in the process of digital transformation, the managers' time orientation should be taken into account. Forward-looking managers instead of myopic ones can help enterprises achieve higher core-technology competence through digital transformation. Implications for policy-making are presented. First, managers should recognize that carrying out digital transformation has two opposite impacts on core technological competence. When implementing digital transformation, it is essential to adopt appropriate strategies to maximize the positive influence and control the negative impact. Second, when making strategic decisions, managers should focus on the long-term interests of enterprises, enhance their dynamic capabilities, provide more information on forward-lookingness in annual reports, and avoid overemphasizing the short-term interests of enterprises. Third, the government should provide policy support for enterprises that actively promote digital transformation and focus on cultivating core-technology competence, and guide enterprises to take advantage of digital transformation.#br#

Cite this article

Lu Ren , Zhao Xiangying , Lyu Daguo . Enterprise Digital Transformation, Managers' Time Orientation and Core-technology Competence:An Inverted U-shape[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2024 , 41(7) : 11 -20 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022110352

References

[1] 刘洋,董久钰,魏江.数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J].管理世界,2020,36(7):198-217.
[2] 焦豪,杨季枫,王培暖,等.数据驱动的企业动态能力作用机制研究——基于数据全生命周期管理的数字化转型过程分析[J].中国工业经济,2021,38(11):174-192.
[3] 宋娟,谭劲松,王可欣,等.创新生态系统视角下核心企业突破关键核心技术“卡脖子”——以中国高速列车牵引系统为例[J].南开管理评论,2023,26(5):4-17.
[4] HANELT A,BOHNSACK R,MARZ D,et al.A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change[J].Journal of Management Studies,2021,58(5):1159-1197.
[5] 陈堂,陈光.数字化转型对产业结构升级的空间效应研究——基于静态和动态空间面板模型的实证分析[J].经济与管理研究,2021,42(8):30-51.
[6] 曹兴,张亮.企业技术核心能力的动态循环过程及其优化研究[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(3):34-38.
[7] ABU-RAHMA A,JALEEL B.Influence of managers' time orientation on strategic practices in the UAE[J].International Journal of Emerging Markets,2017,12(2):219-237.
[8] 田高良,薛宇婷,李星,等.投资者重视管理者的前瞻性吗——基于年报文本分析的经验证据[J].管理工程学报,2023,37(1):225-236.
[9] 俞鸿琳.实体企业金融化:管理者短视角度的新解释[J].经济管理,2022,44(3):55-71.
[10] 张丽.网络零售企业路径依赖形成因素与突破路径探析[J].商业经济研究,2018,37(21):88-91.
[11] JONES M D,HUTCHESON S,CAMBA J D.Past,present,and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: a review[J].Journal of Manufacturing Systems,2021,60:936-948.
[12] CAPPA F,ORIANI R,PERUFFO E,et al.Big data for creating and capturing value in the digitalized environment: unpacking the effects of volume,variety,and veracity on firm performance[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2021,38(1):49-67.
[13] 戚聿东,蔡呈伟.数字化对制造企业绩效的多重影响及其机理研究[J].学习与探索,2020,42(7):108-119.
[14] MIKALEF P,PATELI A.Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA[J].Journal of Business Research,2017(70):1-16.
[15] VECCHIATO R,ROVEDA C.Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2010,77(9): 1527-1539.
[16] 王新光.管理者短视行为阻碍了企业数字化转型吗——基于文本分析和机器学习的经验证据[J].现代经济探讨,2022,40(6):103-113.
[17] 赵强,邓先柏.基于管理者短视理论的高息委托贷款影响研究[J].会计之友,2017,35(9):75-78.
[18] 王帆,许诺,章琳,等.年报预约披露延迟与企业创新[J].会计研究,2020,38(8):159-177.
[19] KIM J,LEE C,CHO Y.Technological diversification,core-technology competence,and firm growth[J].Research Policy,2016,45(1):113-124.
[20] 张杰,郑文平.创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么[J].经济研究,2018,53(5):28-41.
[21] HAANS R F J,PIETERS C,HE Z.Thinking about U: theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J].Strategic Management Journal,2016,37(7):1177-1195.
[22] GOLDSMITH-PINKHAM P,SORKIN I,SWIFT H.Bartik instruments: what,when,why,and how[J].American Economic Review,2020,110(8):2586-2624.
Outlines

/