Against the backgroud ofincreasingly competitive market environment, disruptive innovation has become the key to obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage and determine the success or failure of enterprise competition. As an important part of the main body of innovation and development, 5G technology enterprises represented by Huawei and ZTE have important impacts on promoting the process of disruptive innovation. Although the number of 5G technology enterprises in China has been increased rapidly, the overall strength is still relatively weak, and has not yet had a systematic impact on the national and regional disruptive innovation process. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore the influencing factors of 5G technology enterprises ' disruptive innovation. What are the links between these factors ? Is it possible to further produce some combinations? What are the effects of these combinations on 5G technology enterprises to achieve disruptive innovation ? Thus, the black box of disruptive innovation evolution and operation can befuther opened.#br#There are still some limitations in the existing literature. From the perspective of research, the analytical framework of disruptive innovation is constructed on a single level, and the evolution path of disruptive innovation has not been effectively refined from specific cases. In terms of research content, there is little analysis on the influencing factors of the evolution and operation of disruptive innovation, and it is not clear what kind of connection exists between these influencing factors, and whether it can further produce a combination effect. In terms of research objects, there is a lack of large-scale science and technology enterprises, especially 5G science and technology enterprises, and thus it fails to effectively solve the practical problems that 5G science and technology faces in promoting the development of disruptive innovation. Therefore it is necessary to further deepen the research on the dynamic evolution and operation mechanism ofdisruptive enterprise innovation.#br#Facing the" 14th Five-Year Plan " and the "long-term goal of 2035", this paper puts forward the TOE theoretical framework based on the case data of 30 5G technology enterprises, adopts the two-step fsQCA to construct the configuration effect model of 5G technology enterprises' disruptive innovation between nine influencing factors at three levels of technology, organization and environment, and analyzes the evolution path of 5G technology enterprises' disruptive innovation, which is of great significance to the development of disruptive innovation theory.#br#It is found that industry competition pressure is a remote factor for 5G technology enterprises' disruptive innovation. The government financial support and local economic development have not yet been able to provide essential support for 5G technology enterprises ' disruptive innovation capability. At the same time, there are three evolution paths to enhance the disruptive innovation capability of 5G technology enterprises, including the driving of "independent innovation of technology", orientation of "open innovation of market"and progress of "collaborative innovation of mechanism". By comparing the three evolution paths, it is found that theindependent innovation of technology-driven path is more suitable for the development and change of Chinese market, and can meet the needs of enterprise disruptive innovation capability construction.#br#This study proposes the TOE theoretical framework to study the evolution path of 5G technology enterprises to achieve disruptive innovation, which is more typical and targeted to explore multiple evolution conditions and other issues, and provides theoretical reference and enlightenment for the development of relevant technology enterprises. At the same time, this study adopts the two-step fsQCA, and combined with the Chinese context variables of government finance, local economy and industry competition and their enabling effects on disruptive innovation, it explores the path suitable for the improvement of disruptive innovation performance of Chinese technological enterprises, providing a possible method that is more in line with the practice of Chinese context ,and expanding the innovation characteristic theory and practical research system of technology enterprises in the Chinese context.#br#
Song Zeming
,
Zhang Guangyu
,
Dai Haiwen
. How Can 5G Technology Enterprises Accelerate Disruptive Innovation in the Increasingly Competitive Industry Environment?A Multi-factorConfiguration Analysis Based on Two-step fsQCA[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023
, 40(15)
: 104
-114
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022030299
[1] REINHARDT R, GURTNER S. Differences between early adopters of disruptive and sustaining innovations[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(1): 137-145.
[2] ANSARI S, GARUD R, KUMARASWAMY A. The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37: 1829-1853.
[3] DANIEL A, STEPHEN L J. Assessing Airbnb as a disruptive innovation relative to hotels: substitution and comparative performance expectations[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2017(64): 1-10.
[4] 刘沐洋,郁培丽,杨淼.颠覆性创新合法性动态演化研究——“滴滴出行”案例[J].科研管理,2022,43(8):21-31.
[5] 尚甜甜,缪小明,刘瀚龙,等.资源约束下颠覆性创新过程机制研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021,37(1):35-43,54.
[6] 郁培丽,石俊国,姜坤,等.考虑消费者需求特征的颠覆性创新与产业演化[J].系统工程学报,2021,36(2):256-263.
[7] 余维臻,陈立峰,刘锋.后发情境下创业企业如何成为“独角兽”——颠覆性创新视角的探索性案例研究[J].科学学研究,2021,39(7):1267-1276.
[8] 李树明,邓晰隆.成熟企业颠覆性创新要求与领导能力的匹配[J].企业经济,2021,40(10):41-49.
[9] 王海军,张文耕,戴晓峰,等.组织学习对企业颠覆性创新的影响——基于海尔不用洗衣粉洗衣机的案例研究[J].科学与管理,2021,41(6):1-11.
[10] 欧春尧,刘贻新,戴海闻,等.人工智能企业颠覆性创新的影响因素及其作用路径研究[J].软科学,2021,35(4):55-60,111.
[11] 李纲,余辉,梁镇涛,等.技术交易中供需匹配影响因素研究——基于TOE框架的组态分析[J].情报理论与实践,2022,45(2):85-93,120.
[12] 王康,陈悦.技术融合视角下基于专利的颠覆性技术识别研究[J/OL].情报杂志:1-9[2022-04-13].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1167.G3.20220325.1034.046.html.
[13] 王刚,侯广辉,廖桂铭.不确定性条件下的“创新漏斗”:颠覆性技术的识别方法与多阶段筛选路径研究[J].管理评论,2022,41(4):29-36,134.
[14] 肖艳玲,朱恬,生艳梅,等.颠覆性技术创新及其政策支持[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(4):16-21.
[15] 尹西明,陈劲,海本禄.新竞争环境下企业如何加快颠覆性技术突破——基于整合式创新的理论视角[J].天津社会科学,2019,39(5):112-118.
[16] 李奉书,徐莹婕,杜鹏程,等.数字经济时代下联盟管理能力对企业颠覆性技术创新的影响——知识流动的中介作用与知识重构能力的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(4):80-90.
[17] KLIR G J, YUAN B. Fuzzy set and fuzzy logic: theory and applications[M].Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall,1995.
[18] SCHNEIDER C Q, WAGEMANN C. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2012.
[19] 周海涛,张振刚.政府科技经费对企业创新决策行为的引导效应研究——基于广东高新技术企业微观面板数据[J].中国软科学,2016,31(6):110-120.
[20] 陈劲,赵闯,贾筱,等.重构企业技术创新能力评价体系:从知识管理到价值创造[J].技术经济,2017,36(9):1-8,30.
[21] 李永周,高楠鑫,易倩,等.创新网络嵌入与高技术企业研发人员创新绩效关系研究[J].管理科学,2018,31(2):3-19.
[22] 张庆普,周洋,王晨筱,等.跨界整合式颠覆性创新内在机理与机会识别研究[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(6):93-105.
[23] 陈思睿,杨桂菊,王彤.后发企业的颠覆性创新机理模型——基于小米公司的探索性案例研究[J].管理案例研究与评论,2019,12(4):365-382.
[24] SCHNEIDER C Q. Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions[J].Quality & Quantity, 2019, 53: 1109-1126.
[25] HAESEBROUCK, T. An alternative update of the two-step QCA procedure[J].Quality & Quantity, 2019(3): 1109-1126.