The construction of national high-tech zones is an important measure to improve China's independent innovation ability. And it is of great significance to the strategy of innovative national construction. The free trade zone is an important platform for China to establish a new system for high-level open economy. The outline of the National 14th Five-year Plan clearly stresses the significance of "strengthening the innovation function of high-tech industrial development zones" and "giving free trade zones greater autonomy in reform and innovation". It has become an important measure for China to accelerate the high-quality development of national high-tech zones and free trade zones to promote the strategy of innovation-driven development as well as the reform and opening-up policy. In recent years, the geographical overlap between the national high-tech zone and the free trade zones has become increasingly obvious. The construction emphasis and objectives of these two types of zones are also highly consistent. It has become a practical issue to promote the joint innovation of high-tech zones and free trade zones. More importantly, this is in line with the internal requirements of building a new development pattern. It is very challenging to objectively evaluate the innovation efficiency of high-tech zones and accurately identify the mechanism of the free trade zone policy. #br#Therefore, on the basis of literature and theoretical analysis, this paper aims to clarify the internal mechanism of the joint innovation between high-tech zones and free trade zones, and also makes an empirical study on the impact of the establishment of the free trade zones on innovation efficiency of high-tech zones. This will help give better play to the policy superposition effect of free trade zones and high-tech zones, and build the two types of zones into important nodes of the "dual circulation" development pattern. Specifically,based on the theoretical analysis, this study discusses the theoretical mechanism of the impact of the establishment of free trade zones on the agglomeration level of innovation resources and the innovation efficiency of high-tech zones. Then drawing on the panel data of 34 national high-tech zones and their cities from 2007 to 2020, it uses DEA-Malmquist model to measure the innovation efficiency index of high-tech zones, and also uses the time-varying DID method to evaluate the impacts of free trade zones on the agglomeration level of innovation resource and the innovation efficiency of national high-tech zones. #br#Through the theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, the main conclusions are drawn as follows. First, the mean values of innovation efficiency index, technical efficiency index and technical progress index of both the treatment group and the control group are greater than 1. Among them, the mean value of technical progress index is greater than the mean value of technical efficiency index. This shows that the innovation efficiency of the high-tech zones was improved from 2007 to 2020, and itmainly depended on the improvement of technical progress rather than technical efficiency. Second, the establishment of the free trade zones has a significant positive impact on the agglomeration level of innovative resources of high-tech zones, and it is manifested in three aspects: the agglomeration of high-tech enterprises, the growth of R&D expenditure and the growth of R&D personnel. Third, the establishment of the free trade zones does not significantly improve the innovation efficiency of the high-tech zones. In view of the decomposition of innovation efficiency, the reason is that although the establishment of the free trade zone has significantly improved the technical efficiency of the high-tech zones,it has not significantly improved the technical progress of the high-tech zones. These conclusions suggest that the free trade zones should draw upon the institutional advantages and promote the in-depth reform so that more high-quality innovation elements can be gathered. Then on the basis of the agglomeration of high-tech enterprises and the increase of R&D investment, the high-tech zones should further strengthen their innovation ability and improve the utilization efficiency of innovative resources and the conversion efficiency of technological achievements. Finally, the government should open up the institutional and market channels between the free trade zones and the high-tech zones, and integrate the construction of the free trade zones with the high-tech zones, so as to enhance the policy synergy of the two zones and form complementary advantages.#br#
Liu Fan
,
Xiang Xuzhao
. Impact Assessment and Mechanism Analysis of the Construction of Free Trade Zones on the Innovation Efficiency of National High-tech Zones[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023
, 40(9)
: 22
-32
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022040259
[1] 张立峰,郭爱英,董晓宏. 京津冀国家级高新区创新效率及影响因素——基于随机前沿模型的实证研究[J]. 商业经济研究,2018,30(16):153-155.
[2] CHARNES A , COOPER W W , RHODES E . Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429-444.
[3] 余珮,程阳. 我国国家级高新技术园区创新效率的测度与区域比较研究——基于创新价值链视角[J].当代财经,2016,32(12):3-15.
[4] 邵汉华,周磊. 国家高新区与城市经济效率的时空耦合协调研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(14):36-42.
[5] 欧光军,杨青,雷霖. 国家高新区产业集群创新生态能力评价研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(8):63-71.
[6] ROMER, PAUL M . Increasing returns and long-run growth[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94(5):1002-1037.
[7] CHOI S B , LEE S H , WILLIAMS C . Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China[J].Research Policy, 2011, 40(3):441-452.
[8] 曾武佳,李清华,蔡承岗. 我国高新技术产业开发区创新效率及其影响因素研究[J].软科学,2020,34(5):6-11.
[9] 刘钒,邓明亮. 国家高新区对外贸易、高新技术企业占比影响创新效率的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(24):37-44.
[10] 熊波,金丽雯. 国家高新区提高了城市创新力吗[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(4):40-49.
[11] 周彩云,葛星. 高新区设立与区域绿色经济增长——基于PSM-DID模型[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(3):43-51.
[12] 李荣,张冀新. 创新型产业集群对国家高新区集聚效应影响研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2021,42(8):114-118.
[13] 尹晨,周思力,王祎馨.论制度型开放视野下的上海自贸区制度创新[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2019,61(5):175-180.
[14] 李欣.超越经济治理:自贸区治理体系与治理能力现代化建构研究——以厦门自贸区为例[J].经济体制改革,2018,36(5):33-38.
[15] 智艳,罗长远.上海自贸区发展现状、目标模式与政策支撑[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2018,60(2):148-157.
[16] 全毅,张婷玉. 中国自由贸易试验区转型升级方向与发展路径[J].经济学家,2021,33(10):100-109.
[17] 王爱俭,方云龙. 双循环新发展格局视域下中国自由贸易试验区发展再定位——兼论中国经济高质量发展的自贸区改革路径[J].现代经济探讨,2021,40(11):37-48.
[18] 张阿城,于业芹. 自贸区与城市经济增长:资本、技术与市场化——基于PSM-DID的拟自然实验研究[J].经济问题探索,2020,41(10):110-123.
[19] 刘秉镰,边杨. 自贸区设立与区域协同开放——以京津冀为例[J].河北经贸大学学报,2019,40(1):90-101.
[20] 赵亮. 自贸试验区驱动区域产业结构升级的机理探讨[J].经济体制改革,2021,39(3):122-127.
[21] 龙云安,张健,王雪梅. 科技创新支撑自贸区与长江上游地区协同发展:效应与模式[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(4):92-97.
[22] 王伟楠,傅晋华. 我国自由贸易试验区科技创新政策分析及对海南自贸区(港)的启示[J].科技中国,2019,24(12):36-40.
[23] 叶霖莉. 自贸区建设对地区技术创新水平的影响效应研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2021,42(9):24-28.
[24] 高增安,李肖萌. 自贸区设立背景下的区域创新发展及其影响路径[J].管理现代化,2019,39(5):50-54.
[25] 刘秉镰,王钺. 自贸区对区域创新能力的影响效应研究——来自上海自由贸易试验区准实验的证据[J].经济与管理研究,2018,39(9):65-74.
[26] 盛斌. 中国自由贸易试验区的评估与展望[J].国际贸易,2017,36(6):7-13.
[27] 陈爱贞,刘志彪. 自贸区:中国开放型经济“第二季”[J].学术月刊,2014,46(1):20-28.
[28] 陈琪,刘卫. 建立中国(上海)自由贸易试验区动因及其经济效应分析[J].科学发展,2014,7(2):43-50.
[29] SEYOUM B, RAMIREZ J. Foreign trade zones in the United States: a study with special emphasis on the proposal for trade agreement parity[J].Journal of Economic Studies, 2012, 39(1):13-30.
[30] 诺斯. 制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海: 上海人民出版社,2008.
[31] 李荣. 国家高新区创新能力差异实证分析[J].经济体制改革,2018,36(6):45-50.
[32] 程郁,陈雪. 创新驱动的经济增长——高新区全要素生产率增长的分解[J].中国软科学,2013,28(11):26-39.