The importance of innovation in leading economic development and promoting industrial transformation is increasingly prominent. It is difficult for enterprises to ensure continuous management innovation activities by relying on their limited resources, so boundary-spanning search activities to obtain external knowledge and information are increasingly valued by enterprises. This paper studies the management innovation activities of enterprises from the perspective of boundary-spanning search, clarifies the role mechanism of boundary-spanning search to management innovation, and provides new solutions for enterprises to carry out management innovation activities. #br#Boundary-spanning search plays an important role in management innovation activities, but it is not a direct factor in management innovation. Social cognitive theory suggests that innovation behavior is influenced by cognitive factors, and companies with high cognitive flexibility will make adjustment after receiving external knowledge and information, which in turn will have an impact on management innovation activities of the company. Therefore, this paper argues that cognitive flexibility, as an important factor to promote enterprise growth, plays a "top-down" role in the process of boundary-spanning search for management innovation. In addition, higher absorptive capacity has a beneficial effect on knowledge application and technology transformation, and the resources such as knowledge and information obtained through boundary-spanning search can be better utilized and integrated in practice. Therefore, through the integration, absorption and utilization of resources such as knowledge and information, the absorptive capacity of enterprises can be improved to better catalyze boundary-spanning search to generate new strategies and solutions for cognitive flexibility in response to environmental changes and lay the foundation for enterprise management innovation activities. Based on this, this paper incorporates absorptive capacity into the research framework, which helps to explain the mechanism underlying the process of boundary-spanning search to cognitive flexibility. As shown above, this paper explores the influence mechanism of cognitive flexibility and management innovation from the perspective of boundary-spanning search based on open innovation theory, and collects 287 sample data for empirical study.#br#The results show that technology-driven boundary-spanning search and market-driven boundary-spanning search have positive effects on both exploratory and exploitative management innovation; cognitive flexibility has a mediating effect between boundary-spanning search and management innovation; and absorptive capacity positively moderates the relationship between technology-driven boundary-spanning search and market-driven boundary-spanning search and cognitive flexibility. In addition, we further examine the similarities and differences between large enterprises and small enterprises in terms of boundary-spanning search and absorptive capacity by grouping enterprises according to their size. Through grouping regressions, we find that technology-driven boundary-spanning search is relatively stronger in large and medium-sized firms, and market-driven boundary-spanning search is relatively stronger in small and medium-sized firms. Absorptive capacity has a moderating effect between technology-driven boundary-spanning search and cognitive flexibility in large and medium-sized enterprises, but no moderating effect is found in micro and small enterprises.#br#Based on the logic of knowledge-cognition-innovation, this paper investigates the influence mechanism on cognitive flexibility and managerial innovation from the perspective of boundary-spanning search and draws some contributions. Firstly, management innovation is a relatively new concept in the field of innovation. This study introduces dual theory into the field of management innovation, describes the characteristics of management innovation more systematically, and studies the dual innovation activities of enterprises from the perspective of boundary-spanning search, which provides a new way of thinking for the research of management innovation. Secondly, based on open innovation theory, this paper investigates the influence mechanism on management innovation from the perspective of boundary-spanning search based on the theoretical framework of "boundary-spanning search-cognitive flexibility-management innovation". Specifically, this paper classifies the dimensions of boundary-spanning search based on the difference of knowledge specialization, and verifies the positive influence of boundary-spanning search on management innovation from two aspects of technology-driven and market-driven boundary-spanning search, which enriches the research on the driving factors of management innovation. This study introduces dual theory into the field of management innovation, and studies the dual innovation activities of enterprises from the perspective of boundary-spanning search, which provides a new way of thinking for the research of management innovation. It verifies the positive influence of boundary-spanning search on management innovation from two aspects of technology-driven and market-driven boundary-spanning search and enriches the research on the driving factors of management innovation. Lastly this study introduces absorptive capacity as a moderating variable, and empirically tests that absorptive capacity can optimize the output effect of boundary-spanning search. Therefore it breaks the original thinking stereotypes and clarifies the specific mechanism of boundary-spanning search to promote cognitive flexibility.#br#
Wang Qingjin
,
Shi Renbo
,
Du Tiantian
,
Han Changlin
. How Does Boundary-spanning Search Promote Enterprise Management Innovation? The Role of Cognitive Flexibility and Absorptive Capacity[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2022
, 39(15)
: 67
-78
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.C202107095
[1] 丛贞,马荣康,刘凤朝.问题导向搜索与创业企业新产品创新绩效——来自苹果App Store应用平台的证据[J].科学学研究,2021,39(9):1697-1705.
[2] 李凤娇,吴非,任玎.财政分权、地方政府效率与区域创新[J].科研管理,2021,42(2):112-120.
[3] 朱琳,江轩宇,伊志宏,等.经营杠杆影响企业创新吗[J].南开管理评论,2021,24(6):163-175.
[4] 余传鹏,林春培,张振刚,等.专业化知识搜寻、管理创新与企业绩效:认知评价的调节作用[J].管理世界,2020,36(1):146-166,240.
[5] 贯君,徐建中,林艳.跨界搜寻、网络惯例、双元能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].管理评论,2019,31(12):61-72.
[6] AFIE M B.Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2004, 21(3): 241-244.
[7] 苏敬勤,林海芬.认知偏差视角的管理创新引进机制实证研究[J].管理学报,2012,9(11):1653-1660.
[8] 熊伟,奉小斌,陈丽琼.国外跨界搜寻研究回顾与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2011,33(6):18-26.
[9] RIITTA K,GAUTAM A. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J].The Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6):1183-1194.
[10] 邓昕才,叶一娇,吴亮,等.跨界搜寻的创新驱动力:一个有调节的中介模型[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(24):19-28.
[11] VOLBERDA H W, VAN D B F A J, HEIJ C V. Management innovation: management as fertile ground for innovation[J]. European Management Review,2013,10(1):1-15.
[12] 缪根红,陈万明,唐朝永.外部创新搜寻、知识整合与创新绩效关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(1):130-135.
[13] WHALEN R. Boundary spanning innovation and the patent system: interdisciplinary challenges for a specialized examination system[J].Research Policy,2018,47(7):1334-1343.
[14] PHENE A, KARIN F I, MARSH L. Breakthrough innovations in the us biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(4):369-388.
[15] MENGUC B, AUH S. Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: the role of organizational structure[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2010, 39(5):820-831.
[16] BADRE D, WAGNER A. Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006, 103(18):7186-7191.
[17] LEUNER B, GOULD E. Dendritic growth in medial prefrontal cortex and cognitive flexibility are enhanced during the postpartum period[J]. Journal of Neuroscience, 2010, 30(40):13499-13503.
[18] STEMME A , DECO G , BUSCH A , et al. Neurons and the synaptic basis of the FMRI signal associated with cognitive flexibility[J]. NeuroImage, 2005, 26(2):454-470.
[19] 崔杰,吴婷婷, 胡海青. 认知柔性对裂变创业拼凑的影响——母体网络关系嵌入的倒U型调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(17):28-35.
[20] 左莉,周建林.认知柔性、创业拼凑与新企业绩效的关系研究——基于环境动态性的调节作用[J].预测,2017,36(2):17-23.
[21] 蒋丽芹,李思卉.沉淀冗余、跨界搜寻与高科技企业创新绩效——战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(22):73-80.
[22] ARON K B, ROBERTO C, JORDAN G. Architecture of cognitive flexibility revealed by lesion mapping[J]. NeuroImage, 2013, 82: 547-554.
[23] TEECE D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 28(13):1319-1350.
[24] ZHOU XUE,ZHANG LING,SU XIAOYUN,et al .Signals for entrepreneurial family lending: psychological capital as an intent signal[J].Frontiers in Phychology, 2022,2:797615.
[25] ZHOU XUE,ZHANG LING,SU XIAOYUN. Entrepreneurial institutional environment and entrepreneurial orientation: the mediating role of entrepreneurial passion[J].Frontiers in Phychology, 2022,3:840548.
[26] 刘凤朝,付雅宁,张娜.研发者中间人角色对企业探索式创新的影响研究——吸收能力的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(3):50-60.
[27] AGNIHOTRI A. Low cost innovation in emerging markets[J]. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2015, 22, 399-411.
[28] SOFKA W, GRIMPE C. Specialized search and innovation performance: evidence across Europe[J]. R & D Management, 2010, 40(3):310-323.
[29] DIAMOND A. Executive functions[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, 64: 135-168.
[30] WILLIAM P, VRONIQUE A. Configuring absorptive capacity as a key process for research intensive firms[J]. Technovation, 2015:36-37.
[31] MIGUEL H E, MANUEL S P, CRISTINA S L. Exploitation- and exploration-based innovations:the role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors[J]. technovation, 2011, 31(5-6):203-215.
[32] VACCARO I G, JANSEN J J P, BOSCH F A J V D, et al. Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(1):28-51.