The problems of resource shortage, environmental deterioration and ecological imbalance caused by extensive economic development have been increasingly severe. It has become the basic requirement of social sustainable development to change the traditional mode of production with high energy consumption and high pollution and actively promoting low carbon, green and circular economy. It is inevitable for enterprises to obtain economic benefits and enhance competitive advantage. Green innovation introduces ecological ideas into technological innovative activities with the characteristics of systematic complexity and high situational dependence. Under the background of open economy, it is difficult to effectively carry out green innovation only by relying on the accumulation of the organization's own resources. Enterprises need to break through the organizational boundary to obtain the heterogeneous resources necessary for innovation. It can comprehensively improve the innovative ability of enterprises through efficient reconstruction and allocation. By this way, enterprises can realize the high-quality development in the benign interaction with cooperative members. Therefore, it has become an important way by embedding in external cooperation network for enterprises to obtain various innovative resources, enhance self-innovation ability andsuccessfully carry out green innovation. However, at present, scholars mainly focus on the effect of external environmental pressure, ignoring the impact of social cooperation network.
Following the logical chain of “embeddedness-capability-behavior”, this paper integrates the theory of network embeddedness, resource base theory, higher order theory and institutional theory in order to explore the influence of network embeddedness on green innovation of enterprises and to further analyze its internal mechanism. And the mediating role of green dynamic ability and the moderating role of environmental regulation and managers' environmental attention are further investigated. This study uses questionnaire survey to obtain sample data. The research objects are manufacturing enterprises mainly from Shandong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Tianjin, Hebei and other provinces and cities. The confidentiality and research purpose of the questionnaire are attached at the beginning of the questionnaire to ensure the reliability of the data. The survey time is from September to December 2019. Questionnaires with repeated options and more missing values are excluded. It took four months to distribute questionnaires to 939 enterprises, and 498 valid questionnaires are collected with effective rate of 53.03%. This paper uses the method of multiple regression analysis and structural equation model to test the hypotheses.
The results show that structural embeddedness and relational embeddedness play a significant positive role in promoting green innovation. And green dynamic ability plays an intermediary role between structural embeddedness, relational embeddedness and green innovation. Furthermore, environmental regulation and managers' environmental attention positively moderate the relationship between green dynamic ability and green innovation respectively.
The main contributions and conclusions of this paper are as follows. (1) Based on the perspective of social network, this paper expands the analysis boundary of green innovation by constructing theoretical model of network embeddedness on green innovation. In the era of knowledge economy, enterprises should make extensive contact with outside organizations, strive to occupy favorable position of social network, and establish reciprocal cooperating relations with partners. These are helpful for enterprises to obtain high-quality scarce resources, stimulate innovative thinking and carry out green innovation. (2) This paper explores the intermediary effect of green dynamic ability between network embeddedness and green innovation. It complements and perfects the existing research results of network theory. Structural embeddedness and relational embeddedness are important ways and sources to improve the ability of green resources acquisition and integration. They can create opportunities and conditions for enterprises to search, obtain, allocate and reorganize green resources, which is beneficial to adopt new environmental technologies and products. (3) This paper clarifies the boundary of the influence of dynamic ability on green innovation, and it expounds the applicable situation of dynamic ability theory. Situational variables are important factors for enterprises to make strategic behavior choices. When facing strict external environmental policies, enterprises with strong green dynamic ability are more likely to obtain scarce resources and realize technological innovation through optimization and reorganization. In addition, when managers pay more attention to environmental issues, they are more likely to perceive potential market opportunities and obtain relevant information. Therefore, enterprises with strong green dynamic ability are more likely to carry out green innovation.
[1] 董直庆, 王辉. 环境规制的“本地—邻地”绿色技术进步效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, 36(1): 100-118.
[2] 李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 65 (9): 192-208.
[3] 徐建中, 贯君, 林艳. 制度压力、高管环保意识与企业绿色创新实践——基于新制度主义理论和高阶理论视角[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(9): 72-83.
[4] 陈力田, 朱亚丽, 郭磊. 多重制度压力下企业绿色创新响应行为动因研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(5):710-717.
[5] CAI W G, LI G P. The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,176: 110-118.
[6] LI D Y, ZHENG M, CAO C C. The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: evidence from China top 100[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 41-49.
[7] GREEN S D, LARSEN G D, KAO C. Competitive strategy revisited: contested concepts and dynamic capabilities[J]. Construction Management & Economics, 2008, 26(1): 63-78.
[8] BOYD B K, HAYNES K T, HITT M A, et al. Contingency hypotheses in strategy management research: use, disuse, or misuse[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(1): 278-313.
[9] PHELPS C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(4): 890-913.
[10] GONZALEZ M A, TRIGUERO A, SAEZ MARTINEZ F J. Many or trusted partners for eco-innovation? the influence of breadth and depth of firms' knowledge network in the food sector[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 147: 51-62.
[11] XUE X L, ZHANG X L, WANG L, et al. Analyzing collaborative relationships among industrialized construction technology innovation organizations: a combined SNA and SEM approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 173: 265-277.
[12] 王双龙. 联盟关系的多样性对企业创新平衡模式的影响机制研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39 (1): 107-117.
[13] 徐建中, 李奉书, 李丽, 等. 企业外部关系质量对低碳技术创新的影响: 基于知识视角的研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2017, 31 (2): 183-192.
[14] BATJARGAL B, HITT M, TSUI A, et al. Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs, social networks and new venture growth[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(4): 1024-1049.
[15] HUANG J W, LI Y H. Green innovation and performance: the view of organizational capability and social reciprocity[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 145(2): 309-324.
[16] 吴松强, 苏思骐, 沈忠芹, 等. 产业集群网络关系特征对产品创新绩效的影响——环境不确定性的调节效应[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(5): 46-57.
[17] 孙耀吾, 秦毓, 贺石. 高技术中小企业知识搜索对创新能力的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(3): 550-557.
[18] MORAN P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(12): 1129-1151.
[19] INKPEN A C, TSANG E W K. Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(1): 146-165.
[20] LAVADO A C, RODNGUEZ G C, MEDINA C C. Social and organizational capital building the context for innovation[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2010, 39(4): 681-690.
[21] ZHOU K Z, LI C B. How knowledge affects radical innovation: knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(9): 1090-1102.
[22] LIAO Y C, PHAN P H. Internal capabilities, external structural holes network positions, and knowledge creation[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(13): 1148-1167.
[23] 吴兴宇,王满. 产学研协同创新视角下联盟网络嵌入对创新绩效的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37 (3): 16-23.
[24] SHARMA S. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(4): 681-697.
[25] TSAI K, LIAO Y C. Innovation capacity and the implementation of eco-innovation: toward a contingency perspective [J]. Business Strategy & the Environment, 2017, 26(7): 1000-1013.
[26] MENGUC B, AUH S, OZANNE L. The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm's performance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 94(2): 279-298.
[27] 易朝辉, 罗志辉. 网络嵌入、技术能力与大学衍生企业绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(10): 94-103.
[28] MAKKONEN H, POHJOLA M, OLKKONEN R, et al. Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(1): 2707-2719.
[29] LIN Y H, CHEN Y S. Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities and green service innovation[J]. Quality & Quantity, 2017, 51(4): 1-23.
[30] XIE X M, JIAGE H, ZOU H L. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: a content analysis method[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 101(1): 697-706.
[31] 孙丽文, 任相伟, 李翼凡. 战略柔性、绿色创新与企业绩效——动态环境规制下的交互和调节效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(22): 82-91.
[32] 王娟茹, 张渝. 环境规制、绿色技术创新意愿与绿色技术创新行为[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(2): 352-360.
[33] 邢丽云, 俞会新. 绿色动态能力对企业环境创新的影响研究——环境规制和高管环保认知的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(6): 26-32.
[34] 于飞, 胡查平, 刘明霞. 网络密度、高管注意力配置与企业绿色创新: 制度压力的调节作用[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(2): 55-66.