Considering the Cognitive difference of innovation degree, this paper builds a model to study the licensing contracts mechanism, which an outside innovator sells its horizontal product innovation to one or two firms who compete a la Cournot Under incomplete information.It finds that fixed-fee contract is not always superior than royalty contract to the licensor considering the cognitive disadvantage.In two-part tariff contract, cognitive difference distorts the innovator’s choice from exclusive licensing to non-exclusive licensing.Cognitive difference weakens the licensor's market power, which enhances the advantage of royalty contract.Auction and equity investment contracts are helpful to avoid the influence of incomplete information.It is suggested that the innovation patentee should clarify the long-term return and apply a variety of licensing contracts.To maximize profit with the technology industry chain mutual inclusion of incentives, non-exclusive licensing strategy is adopted to cooperate with royalty, two-part tariff, equity investment contracts, which promotes the application of technological innovation, and improves social welfare.
Wang Junmei
,
Wang Qiaoling
,
Yang Yongdong
. Researchon Licensing a Horizontal Product Innovation Considering the Cognitive Difference of Innovation Degree[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021
, 38(7)
: 134
-140
.
DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020050267
[1] CHEN H, HONG H, MUKHERJEE A, et al.Tariffs, technology licensing and adoption[J].International Review of Economics and Finance, 2016,43 (5): 234-240.
[2] 马永红, 李言睿.不完全信息下企业合作创新决策的多方博弈模型[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2019, 40(9): 1656-1661.
[3] 许家云, 毛其淋, 胡鞍钢.中间品进口与企业出口产品质量升级: 基于中国证据的研究[J].世界经济, 2017,40 (3): 52-75.
[4] 诸竹君, 黄先海, 余骁.进口中间品质量、自主创新与企业出口国内增加值率[J].中国工业经济, 2018, 35(8): 116-134.
[5] 李俊青, 苗二森.不完全契约条件下的知识产权保护与企业出口技术复杂度[J].中国工业经济, 2018, 35(12): 115-133.
[6] 贺俊, 吕铁, 黄阳华,等.技术赶超的激励结构与能力积累:中国高铁经验及其政策启示[J].管理世界, 2018,34(10): 191-207.
[7] 李新剑.后技术赶超时期创新赶超模式研究——创新网络构建视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(21): 26-34.
[8] 谢申祥, 张辉, 王孝松.外国企业的技术授权决策与社会福利[J].世界经济,2013,36(10): 103-122.
[9] WU C.Price competition and technology licensing in a dynamic duopoly[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2018,267 (2): 570-584.
[10] KAMIEN M, TAUMAN Y.Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986, 101(3): 471-491.
[11] 吕峰, 梁琬曈, 张峰.效率还是效果: 复杂环境下企业创新的权衡[J].南开管理评论, 2018, 21(5): 188-199.
[12] 叶光亮, 何亚丽.环境污染治理中的最优专利授权: 固定费用还是特许权收费[J].经济学(季刊), 2018, 17(2): 633-650.
[13] 郭树龙, 杨帆.国外技术授权、研发创新与企业生产率[J].产业经济评论, 2019, 7(4): 18-28.
[14] 徐璐, 叶光亮.竞争政策与跨国最优技术授权策略[J].经济研究, 2018, 53(2): 95-108.
[15] 綦勇, 侯泽敏, 田海峰.Stackelberg竞争下内生技术创新的企业兼并与技术授权[J],系统管理学报,2017, 26(1): 44-53.
[16] ERKAL N.Optimal licensing policy in differentiated industries[J].The Economic Record, 2005, 81(252): 51-64.
[17] GORDANIER J, MIAO C.On the duration of technology licensing[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2011,29 (6): 755-765.
[18] 綦勇, 侯泽敏.进口国关税、异质性与外国企业技术授权[J].科研管理,2016, 37(5): 132-140.
[19] LI C, GENG X.Licensing to a durable-good monopoly[J].Economic Modelling, 2008, 25(5): 876-884.
[20] MIAO C.Licensing a technology standard[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2016, 47(7): 33-61.
[21] TIAN X.Licensing a quality-enhancing innovation to an upstream firm[J].Economic Modelling, 2016,53 (2): 509-514.
[22] ZHANG Q, ZHANG J, ZACCOUR G, et al.Strategic technology licensing in a supply chain[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 267(1): 162-175.
[23] SEN D.On the coexistence of different licensing schemes[J].International Review of Economics and Finance, 2005, 14(4): 393-413.
[24] HEYWOOD S, LI J, YE J.Per unit vs.ad valorem royalties under asymmetric information[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2014, 37(11): 38-46.
[25] 王君美.排他性与非排他性决策下创新授权契约机制研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(4): 14-22.
[26] 金亮, 郑本荣, 胡浔.专利授权合同设计与生产外包——基于企业社会责任的视角[J].南开管理评论, 2019, 22(3): 40-53.
[27] MILLIOU C, PETRAKIS E.Upstream horizontal mergers, vertical contracts, and bargaining[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2007, 25(5): 963-987.