A Study on Enterprises' Design Innovation Path Based on the Differences of Technology Intensity in the Coming Intelligent Era

  • Li Ruohui ,
  • Guan Huiyuan
Expand
  • College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China

Online published: 2017-10-23

Abstract

The coming of the intelligent era brings a further gap between products of the technology intensive industry and traditional manufacturing sectors. Based on the differences of enterprises' technology, this paper divides them into two types. And taking the abilities of discovering and expressing design touch points as the main indexes for enterprises' design capability, it constructs a path of "design capability to design performance to company competitiveness" to research on the characters of designs in these two kinds of enterprises. The result shows that, in companies with lower technology intensity, products' forms and CMF play a positive role on companies' competiveness, while the way of using and the number of designers have a negative effect. In higher technology intensity companies, products' function and usage are the most positive factors, and the design funds together with the technology support also play a positive role.

Cite this article

Li Ruohui , Guan Huiyuan . A Study on Enterprises' Design Innovation Path Based on the Differences of Technology Intensity in the Coming Intelligent Era[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2017 , 34(19) : 107 -113 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016110356

References

[1]BOBILLO A M,RODRIGUEZ S J A.Innovation investment,competitiveness and performance in industrial firms[J].Thunderbird International Business Review,2006,48(6):867890.
[2]DOSI G.Innovation,evolution and economics: where we are and where we should go[J].Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges,2013: 111113.
[3]〖JP+2〗VERGANTI R.Design driven innovation:changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean[M].Harvard Business Press,2013.
[4]KUMAR V.A process for practicing design innovation[J].Journal of business strategy,2009,30(3):91100.
[5]MORILLO M,DELL'ERA C,VERGANTI R.Exploring the role of outsider interpreters in the development of designdriven innovations[J].International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning,2015,10(34): 222253.
[6]辛向阳.交互设计:从物理逻辑到行为逻辑[J].装饰,2015,261(1):5862.
[7]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:中国画报出版社,2012.
[8]NORMAN D A,VERGANTI R.Incremental and radical innovation:design research vs.technology and meaning change[J].Design Issues,2014,30(1): 7896.
[9]AKIIKE A.Where is abernathy and utterback model [J].Annals of Business Administrative Science,2013,12(5): 225236.
[10]RINDOVA V P,PETKOVA A P.When is a new thing a good thing[J].Organization Science,2007,18(2):217232.
[11]ROY R.Industrial knowledge management: a microlevel approach[M].Springer Science & Business Media,2012.
[12]CHIVA R,ALEGRE J.Linking design management skills and design function organization[J].Technovation,2007,20(3):297315.
[13]F ZURLO,C CAUTELA.Design strategies in different narrative frames[J].Design issues,2014,30(1):1935.
[14]程能林.工业设计概论[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2011.
[15]〖JP3〗CABIRIO C,ALESSANDRO D,FRANCESCO Z.Design and innovation: how many ways[J].Design issues,2014,30 (1):36.
[16]LEE H.Recognizing design: the artistic director as silent designer[J].Design Issues,2015,31(4): 5666.
[17]陈劲,陈雪颂.设计驱动式创新:一种开放社会下的创新模式[J].技术经济,2010,29(8):15.
[18]陈圻,陈国栋.三维驱动力网络创新路径及其组合研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(1):122128.
 [19]陈国栋,张海波,陈圻.设计驱动在企业创新行为中的地位研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,33(5):122129.
[20]COOPER R G,EDGETT S J.Best practices in the ideatolaunch process and its governance[J].ResearchTechnology Management,2012,55(2): 4354.
[21]黄鹰.关于品牌价值因果定量评估法的几个问题[J].开放导报,2005,123(6):8588.
[22]DAVID G,DETMAR W S,MARIE C B.Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for reaserch practice[J].Communications of AIS,2000,4(10) :251.
 [23]陈雪颂.设计驱动式创新机理研究[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(4):191196.
[24]金碚.企业竞争力测评的理论与方法[J].中国工业经济,2003(3):513.
 
Outlines

/