|
|
|
| The Impact of the Manufacturing Digitalization on the GVC Division Status Based on the Different Input Sources |
| Xu Zheng1,Zhang Qizi2,Sun Qin1 |
| (1. School of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China;2. Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100006, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract After more than four decades of reform and opening-up, China has made remarkable economic achievements and it has moved from high-speed growth to a stage of high-quality development. However as the world's largest manufacturing country, China is the in low end of the global value chain(GVC) division status of manufacturing industry, and its manufacturing industry is "big but not strong". At present, China not only faces the problem of rising labor costs and other constraints, but is also confronted with a series of challenges from the complex international economic situation, such as anti-globalization, technological control and blockade of Western countries, and the rise of emerging economies. Under the background of the rapid spread of new technological revolution and China's long-term and low-end lock in the global value chain, it is of great practical significance to grasp the opportunity of the digital economy for building a modern industrial system, promoting high-quality development and realizing the goal of becoming a manufacturing power. #br#Although many literatures have analyzed the factors affecting the GVC division status, and some have studied the relationship between digital economy and global value chain, few researches are from the perspective of input sources. The "technology-economy" transformation promoted by digital technology can improve the efficiency of social resource allocation and provide new sources for society. Then, in the process of digitalization, does the digitalization from domestic input and foreign input in a national industry have different effects on the promotion of GVC division status? What is the influence mechanism of manufacturing digitalization on the GVC division status?#br#On the basis of the summary of relevant literature at home and abroad, this paper systematically expounds the mechanism of industrial digitalization affecting the GVC division status, and calculates the index of manufacturing digitalization and the GVC division status by using the panel data of 17 manufacturing industries in 42 economies from 2000 to 2019. An econometric model is constructed to empirically test the influence of manufacturing digitalization on the GVC division status. The results show that the improvement of manufacturing digitalization level originating from domestic resources can significantly promote the improvement of the GVC division status, while the improvement of manufacturing digitalization level originating from foreign countries can significantly inhibit the improvement of the GVC division status. Domestic digitalization can improve the GVC division status through the efficiency enhancement effect.#br#Compared with the existing literature, this paper integrates manufacturing digitalization and GVC division status into a unified analytical framework, and analyzes the impact and transmission mechanism of manufacturing digitalization on GVC division status. Thus,with the analysis of different input sources, this paper has overcome the bias of previous studies only looking at the overall results of "digitalization" improvement while ignoring the influence of sources of digitalization input.#br#The research suggests that firstly digital industrialization should be promoted in an all-round way. It is essential to make more efforts inrelevant research and development to break through technical bottlenecks and improve the technical capacity of the digital industry; it is also urgent to strengthen talent training to improve the value mining ability of data resources, and increase the support of financial insurance, fiscal and tax policies for the digital industry, so as to better play the role of domestic digitalization in promoting the GVC division status. Secondly it is critical to attach importance to the influence of the source of industrial digitalization, give full play to the enhancement effect of domestic digitalization on the GVC division status, become less dependent on international digital industry resources in the process of industrial digitalization, and improve the efficiency of industrial digitalization transformation. Thirdly the government should effectively guide the digital transformation of various industries by unifying data standards, promoting the implementation of the data security law in all industries, establishing a mechanism to protect data security and promoting the formation of a national data circulation, etc. The research conclusion of this paper has reference significance for China to promote industrial digital transformation and rise as a manufacturing power.#br#
|
|
Received: 06 December 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] ANTRS P. Conceptual aspects of global value chains[J]. The World Bank Economic Review，2020，34（3）：551-574.
[2] LOONAM J，O'REGAN N. Global value chains and digital platforms：implications for strategy[J]. Strategic Change，2022，31（1）：161-177.
[3] 张其仔. 产业链供应链现代化新进展、新挑战、新路径[J]. 山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版），2022,72（1）：131-140.
[4] 程俊杰，闫东升. 自主可控、产业识别与政策选择——区域情境下提升产业影响力、控制力的分析框架[J]. 学习与实践， 2021，38（2）：31-39.
[5] 张其仔，许明. 中国参与全球价值链与创新链、产业链的协同升级[J]. 改革，2020,33（6）：58-70.
[6] GOLDFARB A，TUCKER C. Digital economics[J]. Journal of Economic Literature，2019，57（1）：3-43.
[7] 肖旭，戚聿东. 产业数字化转型的价值维度与理论逻辑[J]. 改革，2019，32（8）：61-70.
[8] GOPALAN S，REDDY K，SASIDHARAN S. Does digitalization spur global value chain participation?firm-level evidence from emerging markets[J]. Information Economics and Policy，2022，59:100972.
[9] MBUYISA B，LEONARD A. The role of ICT use in SMEs towards poverty reduction：a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of International Development，2017，29（2）：159-197.
[10] 施炳展. 互联网与国际贸易——基于双边双向网址链接数据的经验分析[J]. 经济研究，2016，51（5）：172-187.
[11] 郭晶，赵越. 高技术产业国际分工地位的影响因素：基于完全国内增加值率视角的跨国实证[J]. 国际商务（对外经济贸易大学学报），2012，26（2）：87-95.
[12] 黄先海，杨高举. 中国高技术产业的国际分工地位研究：基于非竞争型投入占用产出模型的跨国分析[J]. 世界经济，2010，33（5）:82-100.
[13] 戴翔，郑岚. 制度质量如何影响中国跃升全球价值链[J]. 国际贸易问题，2015，41（12）：51-63,132.
[14] 裘莹，郭周明. 数字经济推进我国中小企业价值链攀升的机制与政策研究[J]. 国际贸易，2019，38（11）：12-20,66.
[15] WU Y Q，LU H X，LIAO X L，et al. Research on the digitization of manufacturing will enhance the competitiveness of the value chain based on advantage comparison[J]. Complexity，2021，DOI：10.1155/2021/9917772.
[16] 齐俊妍，任奕达. 数字经济渗透对全球价值链分工地位的影响——基于行业异质性的跨国经验研究[J]. 国际贸易问题，2021，47（9）：105-121.
[17] BANGA K. Digital technologies and product upgrading in global value chains: empirical evidence from Indian manufacturing firms[J]. The European Journal of Development Research，2022，34（1）：77-102.
[18] DILYARD J，ZHAO S，YOU J J. Digital innovation and Industry 4.0 for global value chain resilience：lessons learned and ways forward[J]. Thunderbird International Business Review，2021，63（5）：577-584.
[19] 吕铁. 传统产业数字化转型的趋向与路径[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿，2019，8（18）：13-19.
[20] 王彬，高敬峰，宋玉洁. 数字技术与全球价值链分工——来自中国细分行业的经验证据[J]. 当代财经，2021，42（12）：115-125.
[21] CUSOLITO A P，LEDERMAN D，PENA J O. The effects of digital-technology adoption on productivity and factor demand: firm-level evidence from developing countries[R]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 9333, 2020.
[22] 王姝楠，陈江生. 数字经济的技术-经济范式[J]. 上海经济研究，2019，36（12）：80-94.
[23] NAMBISAN S，WRIGHT M，FELDMAN M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship：progress，challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8):1-9.
[24] JANSSEN M，HAIKO V，WAHYUDI A . Factors influencing big data decision-making quality[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 70(1)：338-345.
[25] ANDERSON N，POTOCNIK K，ZHOU J. Innovation and creativity in organizations：a state-of-the-science review，prospective commentary，and guiding framework[J]. Journal of Management，2014，40（5）：1297-1333.
[26] 郭海，韩佳平. 数字化情境下开放式创新对新创企业成长的影响：商业模式创新的中介作用[J]. 管理评论，2019，31（6）：186-198.
[27] 李唐，李青，陈楚霞. 数据管理能力对企业生产率的影响效应——来自中国企业—劳动力匹配调查的新发现[J].中国工业经济，2020，37（6）：174-192.
[28] WANG Z，WEI S J，ZHU K. Quantifying international production sharing at the bilateral and sector levels[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 19677，2013.
[29] WANG Z，WEI S J，YU X，et al. Measures of participation in global value chains and global business cycles[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 23222，2017.
[30] 吴友群，卢怀鑫，王立勇. 数字化对制造业全球价值链竞争力的影响——来自中国制造业行业的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策，2022，39（7）：53-63.
[31] 张晴，于津平. 制造业投入数字化与全球价值链中高端跃升——基于投入来源差异的再检验[J]. 财经研究，2021，47（9）：93-107.
[32] 余海燕，沈桂龙. 对外直接投资对母国全球价值链地位影响的实证研究[J]. 世界经济研究，2020，39（3）：107-120,137.
[33] KOOPMAN R，POWERS W，WANG Z，et al. Give credit where credit is due：tracing value added in global production chains[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16426，2010.
[34] 徐小锋. 关税变动对我国产业全球价值链参与度和位置影响研究[D]. 上海:上海财经大学，2021.
[35] 范兆娟，艾玮炜. 数字贸易规则对中国嵌入全球价值链的影响[J]. 财贸研究，2022，33（2）：31-41.
|
|
|
|
