|
|
Research on Configuration Path of Incentive Factors of Science and Technology Talents:a QCA Analysis |
Li Zuoxue,Ma Jingjing |
(School of Economics and Management,Shenyang Aerospace University,Shenyang 110136,China) |
|
|
Abstract Talent is the first resource of science and technology innovation,and the key to talent playing the role lies in motivation. There are few existing literatures that analyze the factors influencing the motivation of science and technology talents from multiple interactive perspectives. Taking 247 science and technology talents in Liaoning province as the research object,using the method of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis,this paper discusses how incentive factors affect the job engagement of science and technology talents in multiple ways. The results show that: salary and welfare are the necessary conditions to affect the job engagement of scientific and technological talents; there are three ways to lead the active job engagement of scientific and technological talents: the first way is high performance management,high salary and welfare and high work autonomy; the second way is high performance management,high salary and welfare and high external support; the third way is high salary and welfare,high work autonomy and high external support there are two ways for the negative job engagement of scientific and technological talents,and there is an asymmetric relationship between the negative job engagement and the positive job engagement of scientific and technological talents.
|
Received: 22 September 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 新华社.我国研发人员总量连续6年稳居世界第一位[EB/OL].新华社,2019.7.23 http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/23/content_5413519.htm.[2] 李志红.完善发现、培养、激励机制 全面增强科技人才活力[N].科技日报,2020-03-19(08).[3] 张术霞,范琳洁,王冰.我国企业知识型员工激励因素的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(5):144-149.[4] 张望军,彭剑锋.中国企业知识型员工激励机制实证分析[J].科研管理,2001,22(6):90-96,62.[5] 石超英.关于新型科技人才激励机制的探讨[J].山东社会科学,2008,22(7):127-129.[6] 倪乐一.科研团队创新激励机制探析[J].中国高校科技,2016,30(11):26-27.[7] 胡威,刘松博.我国科技人才人力资源管理体系研究——基于北京市1879份问卷的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(7):136-141.[8] 许华.高校科研激励机制的反思与重建[J].教育评论,2016,32(11):73-76.[9] 徐言琨,侯克兴.科技型企业创新网络结构与创新绩效影响关系研究[J].工业技术经济,2020,39(4):36-41.[10] 赵晨,薛晔,牛冲槐,等.我国科技人才空间聚集及时空异质性研究[J].统计与决策,2020,36(14):60-64.[11] 斯蒂芬·罗宾斯.组织行为学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.[12] LOCKER E A,LATHAM G P. What should we do about motivation theory? six recommendations for the twenty-first century [J].Academy of management review,2004,29(3): 388-403.[13] 杨东进,冯超阳.保健因素主导、激励因素缺失:现象、成因及启示——基于“80后”员工组织激励的实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(2):20-27.[14] SCHAUFELI W.B,SALANOVA M,GONZLEZROM V.The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach [J].Journal of Happiness studies,2002,3(1):71-92.[15] SCHAUFELI W B,TARIS T W,BAKKER A B.Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde? on the differences between work engagement andworkaholism[J].Researchcompanionto working time& work addiction,2006(9):193-217.[16] 李锐,田晓明,孙建群.自我牺牲型领导对员工知识共享的作用机制[J]. 南开管理评论,2014,17(5):24-32.[17] 胡威,刘松博.我国科技人才人力资源管理体系研究——基于北京市1879份问卷的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(7):136-141.[18] 邰蕾蕾,刘晓峰.青年科技人才绩效评价系统的设计与实现[J].运筹与管理,2013,22(6):200-203.[19] 何艳娜.创新人才绩效管理的过程激励之方[J].领导科学,2019,35(6): 102-104.[20] 李雅鸿,李健.知识型团队激励机制研究与实例分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2011,32(10):50-53.[21] 张学艳,周小虎.顶尖科技人才年薪制:价值意蕴、结构动因、困境与实践[J].管理现代化,2019,39(2):107-110.[22] 熊亮.我国科研事业单位工资制度改革的趋势、脉络和建议[J].中国行政管理,2019,35(3):34-41.[23] 张和平,沈红.薪酬水平对高校教师科研生产率的激励——基于“全国大学教师调查”的实证研究[J].现代教育管理,2019,39(7):84-91.[24] 刘健,刘春林,刘润刚,等.高科技企业员工弹性工作时间的绩效研究:基于工作自主性的调节中介模型[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(19):119-124+136.[25] 许华.高校科研激励机制的反思与重建[J].教育评论,2016,32(11):73-76.[26] 张宝玲,吴方,王济干.基于框架分析法的高校高层次人才薪酬激励模式创新研究[J].江苏高教,2018,34(5):26-31.[27] 顾志恒.如何调动高校教师转化科技成果的积极性——从科技成果转化人才激励机制谈起[J].中国高校科技,2018,32(3):64-66.[28] 王立剑,代秀亮,金蕾,等.人才头衔能否提升科技人才职业成就动机——来自我国一流大学建设高校的证据[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(4):153-160.[29] 周杨,王征.科研型组织激励机制创新研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28 (15):154-156.[30] 石冠峰,韩宏稳.新生代知识型员工激励因素分析及对策[J].企业经济,2014,33(11):62-66.[31] 张轶文,甘怡群.中文版Utrecht工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(3):268-270,281.[32] RAGIN C C.The comparative methodmoving beyond qualitative and quantative strategies[M].California:University of California Press,1987.[33] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017,33(6):155-167.[34] 杜运周.组织与创业领域——组态视角下的创业研究[J].管理学季刊,2019,4(3):31-41,140.[35] SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences [M]. Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2012:336-345.[36] FISS P C.Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research [J].Academy of management journal,2011,54(2): 393-420.[37] 张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报,2019,16(9):1312-1323.[38] RAGIN C C.Redisigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[J].Social forces,2010,88(4):1936-1938.[39] 辽宁省科学技术厅.中共辽宁省委办公厅、辽宁省人民政府办公厅印发《关于贯彻以增加知识价值为导向分配政策的实施意见》的通知[EB/OL].http://www.ln.gov.cn/zfxx/lnsrmzfgb/2017/qk/d13q/gwywj_100167/201709/t20170908_3030203.html.[40] 辽宁省人民政府.我省启动科技成果转化政策激励试点工作:探索实行科研经费包干制、科研事业单位年薪制等新举措[EB/OL].http://www.ln.gov.cn/zfxx/jrln/jrgz/201908/t20190801_3542215.html.[41] 中国新闻网.辽宁打响人才战,引“凤凰”向东北飞[EB/OL].https://www.sohu.com/a/339258863_123753.[42] 辽宁科学技术厅政策法规与监督处.关于深化省级科技计划项目和资金管理“放管服”改革若干措施的通知解读[EB/OL].http://kjt.ln.gov.cn/kjzc/zcjd/201910/t20191010_3608935.html. |
|
|
|