团队—成员交换差异对团队创新影响机理研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021060654

科技进步与对策

2022, Vol. 39

Issue (16): 153-160 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021060654

科技人才培育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

团队—成员交换差异对团队创新影响机理研究

陈超¹,刘新梅²

（1.河海大学商学院，江苏南京 211100；2.西安交通大学管理学院，陕西西安 710049）

Influence Mechanism of Team-member Exchange Differentiation on Team Innovation

Chen Chao¹,Liu Xinmei²

(1.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;2.School of Management, Xi′an Jiaotong University，Xi′an 710049, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1222 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要从社会认知理论出发，将水平和垂直互动关系纳入同一研究框架，以团队认知整合作为中介变量，关系透明度作为调节变量，构建团队—成员交换（TMX）差异对团队创新的作用模型。采用SPSS等统计分析软件，基于74个团队396名成员数据，对研究假设进行检验。结果表明：TMX差异对团队创新具有负向作用；TMX差异对团队认知整合具有负向作用；团队认知整合对团队创新具有正向作用，且团队认知整合能够中介TMX差异与团队创新间关系；关系透明度对TMX差异与团队认知整合间关系发挥显著调节作用；关系透明度调节团队认知整合对TMX差异—团队创新的中介作用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈超
	刘新梅

关键词 ：团队—成员交换差异, 团队认知整合, 关系透明度, 团队创新

收稿日期: 2021-06-28 修回日期: 2021-08-31

ZTFLH:

C936

基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目（71572140）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目（B210201054,B220201049）

作者简介: 陈超（1991—），男，江苏连云港人，博士，河海大学商学院讲师，研究方向为领导力与创造力；刘新梅（1962—），女，河北河间人，博士，西安交通大学管理学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为创造力与服务创新等。本文通讯作者：陈超。

引用本文:

陈超,刘新梅. 团队—成员交换差异对团队创新影响机理研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(16): 153-160.
Chen Chao,Liu Xinmei. Influence Mechanism of Team-member Exchange Differentiation on Team Innovation. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2022, 39(16): 153-160.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2021060654 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2022/V39/I16/153

[1] 常涛, 董丹丹. 地位冲突对团队创造力的影响:共享内在动机视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(20): 144-153.
[2] 沈超红, 李永连, 程飞. 非正式互动对团队创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(2): 200-208.
[3] LIAO H, LIU D, LOI R. Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(5): 1090-1109.
[4] LIU Y, KELLER R T, SHIH H A. The impact of team-member exchange, differentiation, team commitment, and knowledge sharing on R&D project team performance[J]. R&D Management, 2011, 41(3): 274-287.
[5] BANDURA A.Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective[J].Annual Review of Psychology，2001，52(1): 1-26.
[6] 弗雷德·鲁森斯. 组织行为学（9版）[M]. 王垒,译.北京:人民邮电出版社, 2008:15-36.
[7] CRONIN M A, BEZRUKOVA K, WEINGART L R, et al. Subgroups within a team: the role of cognitive and affective integration[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 32(6): 831-849.
[8] 余义勇, 杨忠. 团队领导跨界行为如何影响团队创造力——基于知识整合和团队氛围的整合视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(12): 129-144.
[9] WALUMBWA F O, AVOLIO B J, GARDNER W L, et al. Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(1): 89-126.
[10] FORD L R, SEERS A. Relational leadership and team climates: pitting differentiation versus agreement[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(3):258-270.
[11] 李燃, 王辉, 赵佳卉. 真诚型领导行为对团队创造力的影响[J].管理科学, 2016, 29(5): 71-82.
[12] LOCKWOOD, PENELOPE. Could it happen to you:predicting the impact of downward comparisons on the self[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2002, 82(3): 343-58.
[13] TSE H, DASBOROUGH M T, ASHKANASY N M. A multi-level analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2008, 19(2): 195-211.
[14] GINKEL W, KNIPPENBERG D V. Group information elaboration and group decision making: the role of shared task representations[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2008, 105(1): 82-97.
[15] 彭伟, 马越, 陈奎庆. 辱虐型领导对团队创造力的影响机制研究:一个有调节的中介模型[J].管理评论, 2020, 32(11): 208-219.
[16] 花常花, 罗瑾琏, 闫丽萍. 知识权力视角下悖论式领导对研发团队创新的作用及影响机制研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2022,39（2）:139-149.
[17] 李倩, 龚诗阳, 李超凡. 团队文化多样性对团队创新的影响及作用机制[J].心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539.
[18] VOGELGESANG G R, LEROY H, AVOLIO B J. The mediating effects of leader integrity with transparency in communication and work engagement/performance[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24(3): 405-413.
[19] GATLING A, SHUM C, BOOK L, et al. The influence of hospitality leaders' relational transparency on followers' trust and deviance behaviors: mediating role of behavioral integrity[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2017, 62(5): 11-20.
[20] KERNIS M H. Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem[J]. Psychological Inquiry, 2003, 14(1): 1-26.
[21] NORMAN S M, AVOLIO B J, LUTHANS F. The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2010, 21(3): 350-364.
[22] GRAEN G B, UHL-BIEN M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J].Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(2): 219-247.
[23] BRISLIN R W. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material[J]. Handbook of Cross-cultural Psychology, 1980, 2(2): 389-444.
[24] SEERS A, PETTY M M, CASHMAN J F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management a naturally occurring quasi-experiment[J]. Group & Organization Management, 1995, 20(1): 18-38.
[25] LOVELACE K, SHAPIRO D L, WEINGART L R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams′ innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(4): 779-793.
[26] HU J, JUDGE T A. Leader-team complementarity: exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, 102(6): 935-955.
[27] ROGER T A J, LEENDERS J M L, JAN K. Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective[J]. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 2003, 20(1-2): 69-92.
[28] COHEN J, COHEN P, WEST S G, et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.)[J]. Erlbaum Associates, 2003, 52(4): 227-229.
[29] PREACHER K J, HAYES A F. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models[J]. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 2004, 36(4): 717-731.
[30] AIKEN L S, WEAT S G. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions-institute for social and economic research (ISER)[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1991, 45(1):119-120.
[31] ZHAO H. Leader-member exchange differentiation and team creativity[J]. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 2015, 36(7): 798-815.