Nowadays, the new generation of employees represented by the "post-90s" has become the backbone of enterprises, and they have become important human resources for the core competitiveness of enterprises. The new generation of "post-90s" tend to challenge convention, and question everything with innovative and critical thinking. With the changing supply and demand relationship in the labor market, they are more likely to experience a feeling of "overqualification". With the vigorous development of the digital economy, the application of emerging digital technologies in traditional fields continues to deepen, bringing enormous innovation potential and opportunities to enterprises in digital transformation. The new generation of employees is facing an "innovation paradox" , and in order to break through this barrier and the innovation bottlenecks, and give full play to their flexibility and creativity, some employees may resort to deviant methods to solve the dilemma of being "shackled", which will trigger spontaneous deviant innovation behavior. #br#Currently, most studies have focused on overqualification from a negative perspective, and believed that overqualification can easily lead to negative attitudes and behaviors, such as low job satisfaction, high turnover behavior and anti-productive behavior. However, it is worth noting that the complexity of overqualification and deviant innovation behaviors cannot be ignored. Overqualification could be a valuable resource, and it is of significance to further explore how to reduce the occurrence of negative behaviors and promote the transformation of redundant qualifications into innovative achievements through the rational allocation of resources and the induction of boundary conditions. #br#This empirical study aims to explore the influence mechanism of the new generation of employees perceived overqualification, role breadth self-efficacy and negative emotions on deviant innovation behavior in China. Following self-regulation theory and self-consistency theory, the study constructs a moderated mediation model from the perspective of individual perception and psychological motivation, with role breadth self-efficacy and negative emotions as mediator variables, and psychological security as a moderator variable. A questionnaire survey is conducted among 332 "post-90s" employees from the manufacturing industry, the Internet and the financial industry in Beijing, Hebei, Tianjin, etc. The hierarchical regression and Bootstrap procedures are used to test the moderated mediating model. It is found that (1) perceived overqualification positively affects employees' deviant innovation behavior;(2) role breadth self-efficacy and negative emotions partially mediate the relationship between overqualification and deviant innovation in cognitive and emotional perspectives respectively;(3) psychological security positively moderates the relationship between role breadth self-efficacy and employee deviant innovation;(4) psychological security positively moderates the relationship between negative emotions and employee deviant innovation.#br#The theoretical contributions of this study are mainly as follows. Firstly, following the self-regulation theory, this study reveals why the new generation of overqualified employees use deviant innovation as a way to prove their qualifications, reflect their self-worth, pursue career development, and increase innovation challenges. On the basis of analyzing their psychological needs and intrinsic motivation, this study creatively integrates ability, willingness and boldness into the same model. Secondly, this study focuses on the complexity of overqualification and deviant innovation behavior. It incorporates two seemingly contradictory but actually parallel perspectives, i.e., role breadth self-efficacy and negative emotions, into the theoretical model. It then integrates the generation and action paths of positive and negative aspects, which can not only depict the complexity of overqualification, but also coincide with the characteristics of deviant innovation with both "loyalty" and "rebellion". Thirdly, this study constructs a moderated mediation model by introducing psychological security, clarifying the boundary of the mechanism between overqualification and deviant innovation behavior. With the continuous changes and development of the internal and external environment, it is extremely important for employees to be bold when facing opportunities and challenges, especially when deviant innovation is highly risky and uncertain. Therefore, this study introduces this perception of environmental safety as a moderate variable in innovation. From the perspective of boldness, it provides an explanation mechanism that can transform supportive perceptions into specific innovative behaviors, helping to understand the behavioral tendencies of employees responding to different stimuli.#br#
[1] 侯烜方,刘蕴琦,黄蓉,等.新生代员工工作价值观对越轨创新的影响机制:标新立异还是阳奉阴违[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(14):143-150.
[2] 丁秀玲,王慧,赵李晶.员工资质过剩的成因、影响及管理策略——高质量发展语境的审视[J].江海学刊,2019,62(2):238-242.
[3] LIN B,LAW K S,ZHOU J.Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? a task crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations[J].Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(1):156-177.
[4] MAYNARD D C,TAYLOR E B,HAKEL M D.Applicant overqualification: perceptions,predictions,and policies of hiring managers[J].Organizational Behavior and Dynamics,2009(1):13-38.
[5] HARARI M B,MANAPRAGADA A,VISWESVARAN C.Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? a meta-analysis of perceived overqualification[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior,2017,102:28-47.
[6] LIU S,MO W. Perceived overqualification: a review and recommendations for research and practice[J].Research in Occupational Stress & Well Being,2012,10(1):1-42.
[7] ALICKE MD,SEDIKIDES C. Self-enhancement and self-protection: what they are and what they do[J]. European Review of Social Psychology,2009,20(1):1-48.
[8] SCHERMULY C C,CREON L,GERLACH P,et al. Leadership styles and psychological empowerment: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,2022,29(1):73-95.
[9] ZHANG M J,LAW K S,LIN B. You think you are big fish in a small pond? perceived overqualification,goal orientations,and proactivity at work[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2016,37(1):61-84.
[10] CHU F,LIU S,GUO M,et al. I am the top talent: perceived overqualification,role breadth self-efficacy,and safety participation of high-speed railway operators in China[J]. Safety Science,2021,144:105476.
[11] 黄玮,项国鹏,杜运周,等.越轨创新与个体创新绩效的关系研究——地位和创造力的联合调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(1):143-154.
[12] 王弘钰,崔智淞,邹纯龙,等.忠诚还是叛逆?中国组织情境下的员工越轨创新行为[J].心理科学进展,2019,27(6):975-989.
[13] TENZER H,YANG P. Personality,values,or attitudes? individual-level antecedents to creative deviance[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2019,23(2):1950009.
[14] AUGSDORFER P .Bootlegging and path dependency[J]. Research Policy,2005,34(1):1-11.
[15] 江依.员工越轨创新行为研究综述及其展望[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(10):131-139.
[16] FRAZIER M L,FAINSHMIDT S,KLINGER R L,et al. Psychological safety: a meta-analytic review and extension[J]. Personnel Psychology,2017,70(1):113-165.
[17] 赵李晶,张正堂,宋锟泰,等.基于资源保存理论的资质过剩与员工时间侵占行为关系研究[J].管理学报,2019,16(4):506-513.
[18] 张君,孙健敏,尹奎.90后新生代员工的特征:基于社会表征的探索[J].企业经济,2019,29(8):111-117.
[19] 王朝晖.员工资质过剩感与创新行为关系研究:社会认知理论的视角[J].科技与经济,2019,32(3):65-69.
[20] PARKER S K,BINDL U K,STRAUSS K. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation [J].Journal of Management,2010,36(4):827-856.
[21] 马蓓,胡蓓,侯宇. 资质过高感对员工创造力的U型影响——能力面子压力的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2018,21(5):150-161.
[22] MAINEMELIS C. Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas[J].Academy of Management Review,2010,35(4):558-578.
[23] AXTELL C M,HOLMAN D J,UNSWORTH K L,et al. Shopfloor innovation: facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2000,73(3):265-285.
[24] ZHANG F,PARKER S K. Reorienting job crafting research: a hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2019,40 (2):126-146.
[25] 周燕,钱慧池.工作嵌入对知识型员工越轨创新行为的影响——建设性责任知觉与角色宽度自我效能的链式中介作用[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(16):142-150.
[26] 黄杜鹃,许广永,魏巍.上下级关系矛盾体验对员工越轨创新行为的双刃剑效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(2):141-150.
[27] ISRAEL SANCHEZ-CARDONA,VERA M,MARTíNEZ-LUGO M,et al. When the job does not fit: the moderating role of job crafting and meaningful work in the relation between employees perceived overqualification and job boredom[J].Journal of Career Assessment,2020,28(2):257-276.
[28] 王弘钰,邹纯龙,崔智淞.差序式领导对员工越轨创新行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(9):131-137.
[29] GEORGE J M,ZHOU J. Dual tuning in a supportive context: joint contributions of positive mood,negative mood,and supervisory behaviors to employee[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):605-622.
[30] 于静静,苑玲玲,蒋守芬.包容型领导对员工创造力的影响研究——心理契约的中介作用[J].经济问题,2023,45(2):94-101.
[31] 李海,熊娟,朱金强.情绪对个体创造力的双向影响机制——基于阴阳观的视角[J].经济管理,2016,38(10):100-113.
[32] KAHN W A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work[J].Academy of Management Journal,1990,33(4):692-724.
[33] NANYANGWE C N,WANG H,CUI Z. Work and innovations: the impact of self-identification on employee bootlegging behaviour[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management,2021,30(4): 713-725.
[34] 梁昊,李锡元,舒熳.资质过剩对员工创新行为的影响——一个跨层的调节模型[J].软科学,2019,33(2):122-125.
[35] 鞠芳辉,谢子远,季晓芬.善待员工的工作不满:工作不满与员工创新性的关系实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2008,25(6):108-117.
[36] 蒋瑜洁,徐永恒.何为越轨创新:文献综述与研究展望[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(5):150-160.
[37] 李朋波,陈黎梅,褚福磊,等.我是高材生:资质过剩感及其对员工的影响[J].心理科学进展,2021,29(7):1313-1330.