员工地位竞争动机、知识分享行为与创新绩效——基于嵌入性悖论视角

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2022050498

科技进步与对策

2022, Vol. 39

Issue (23): 119-127 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022050498

科技人才培育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

员工地位竞争动机、知识分享行为与创新绩效——基于嵌入性悖论视角

程德俊,王肖宇

（南京大学商学院，江苏南京 210093）

Employee Status-striving Motivation, Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Innovation Performance：A Study from the Perspective of Embeddedness Paradox

Cheng Dejun,Wang Xiaoyu

(School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1256 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要组织中个体创新常常面临嵌入性悖论。相对于传统地位竞争的反功能视角，人们日益认识到地位竞争尤其是威望型地位竞争，可以为个体提供创新资源和动力。有效化解这一悖论，关键在于明晰何种类型的地位竞争以及何种程度的嵌入性可以促进个体创新。对一家大型多业务单元传媒集团227名员工进行实证调查，分析结果表明：威望型地位竞争可以通过促进个体知识分享行为提升个体创新绩效；非正式地位较低的个体更有可能具有威望型地位竞争动机；正式地位与非正式地位对个体地位竞争动机有交互影响，处于高正式地位的成员如果在非正式网络中处于边缘位置，则更可能在地位竞争中表现出威望型地位竞争动机。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	程德俊
	王肖宇

关键词 ：嵌入性悖论, 地位竞争动机, 非正式地位, 正式地位, 创新绩效

收稿日期: 2022-05-12 修回日期: 2022-07-15

ZTFLH:

F272.92

基金资助:国家自然科学基金重点项目（72132003，71832006）;国家自然科学基金面上项目（72072084，71572077）

作者简介: 程德俊（1976—），男，江苏泰州人，博士，南京大学商学院教授，研究方向为战略人力资源管理；王肖宇（1997—），女，河南周口人，南京大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向为战略人力资源管理。本文通讯作者：王肖宇。

引用本文:

程德俊,王肖宇. 员工地位竞争动机、知识分享行为与创新绩效——基于嵌入性悖论视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(23): 119-127.
Cheng Dejun,Wang Xiaoyu. Employee Status-striving Motivation, Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Innovation Performance：A Study from the Perspective of Embeddedness Paradox. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2022, 39(23): 119-127.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022050498 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2022/V39/I23/119

[1] VUORI V, OKKONEN J. Knowledge sharing motivational factors of using an intra-organizational social media platform[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2012, 16(4):592-603.
[2] BATTILANA J. Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals' social position[J]. Organization, 2006, 13(5):653-676.
[3] WILLER R. Groups reward individual sacrifice: the status solution to the collective action problem[J]. American Sociological Review, 2009, 74(1):23-43.
[4] BUNDERSON J S, REAGANS R E. Power, status, and learning in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5):1182-1194.
[5] 刘智强, 卫利华, 周空, 等. 地位冲突的双面特性与团队创新[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(4):176-186.
[6] LOCH C H, YAZIJI M, LANGEN C. The fight for the alpha position: channeling status competition in organizations[J]. European Management Journal, 2001, 19(1): 16-25.
[7] 莱维特. 自上而下——永恒的层级管理[M]. 李维安, 周建, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006:73-91.
[8] ANDERSON C, WILLER R. Do status hierarchies benefit groups:a bounded functionalist account of status[M]. The Psychology of Social Status, 2014:47-70.
[9] MAGEE C, GALINSKY D. Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2008, 2(1): 351-398.
[10] 格兰诺维特. 社会与经济: 信任、权力与制度[M]. 王水雄, 罗家德, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2019:23-31.
[11] KILDUFF G J, WILLER R, ANDERSON C. Hierarchy and its discontents: status disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance[J]. Organization Science, 2016, 27(2):373-390.
[12] 唐于红, 赵琛徽, 陶然, 等. 地位竞争动机对个体知识共享行为的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(10):118-127.
[13] KELTNER D,GRUENFELD D H,ANDERSON C.Power，approach，and inhibition[J]. Psychological Review, 110(2):265-284.
[14] 格兰诺维特. 镶嵌: 社会网与经济行动[M]. 罗家德, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2015:1-32.
[15] 程德俊. 组织中地位竞争与领导方式变革[M]. 南京：南京大学出版社, 2019:1-11.
[16] CHENG J T J L, TRACY T, FOULSHAM. Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2013, 104(1):103-125.
[17] 张少峰, 程德俊, 李菲菲, 等. 创造性团队中地位关注动机、竞争行为与知识共享[J]. 经济管理, 2019,41 (9):109-124.
[18] ANDERSON C, KILDUFF G J. Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups：the competence-signaling effects of trait dominance[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2009, 96(2):491-503.
[19] WILTERMUTH S S, RAJ M, WOOD A. How perceived power influences the consequences of dominance expressions in negotiations[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2018, 146(5):14-30.
[20] 刘智强, 邓传军, 廖建桥, 等. 地位竞争动机、地位赋予标准与员工创新行为选择[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013, 31(10):83-95.
[21] 胡琼晶, 谢小云. 团队成员地位与知识分享行为: 基于动机的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4):545-554.
[22] 李伟, 梅继霞. 领导授权赋能对员工创新行为影响研究——一个有调节的中介模型[J].软科学, 2018, 228(12):75-79.
[23] BLADER S L, CHEN Y R. Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, 102(5):994-1014.
[24] BUNDERSON J S. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: a status characteristics perspective[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(4):557-591.
[25] BOXENBAUM E, BATTILANA J. Importation as innovation: transposing managerial practices across fields[J]. Strategic Organization, 2005, 3(4):355-383.
[26] BUNDERSON J S,BOUMGARDEN P.Structure and learning in self-managed teams: why "bureaucratic" teams can be better learners[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(3):609-624.
[27] XU DEAN, ZHOU KEVIN, DU FEI. Deviant versus aspirational tisk taking: the effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018，62(4):1226-1251.
[28] GRANOVETTER M. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78(6):1360-1380．
[29] 邓传军, 刘智强. 非正式地位对员工主动变革行为的影响机制研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(4):215-224.
[30] BOUMGARDEN P,NICKERSON J,ZENGER T R.Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2012, 33(6):587-610.
[31] GROYSBERG B, POLZER J T, ELFENBEIN H A. Too many cooks spoil the broth: how high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness[J]. Organization Science, 2016, 22(3):722-737.
[32] DJURDJEVIC E,STOVERINK A C,KLOTZ A C.Workplace status: the development and validation of a scale[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, 102(7):1124-1147.
[33] COLLINS C J, SMITH K G. Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(3):544-560.
[34] JANSSEN O, HUANG X. Us and me: team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members' citizenship and creative behaviors[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(1):69-88.
[35] HANSEN S, AVITAL M. Share and share alike: the social and technological influences on knowledge sharing behavior[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 5(1):1-19.
[36] MOHAMMED S, NADKARNI S. Temporal diversity and team performance: the moderating role of team temporal leadership[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(3):489-508.
[37] FELIN T N J, FOSS. Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations[J]. Strategic Organization, 2016, 3(4):441-455.