数据要素专栏

数据资产何以提升企业绿色创新能力——基于双重机器学习模型的因果推断

  • 毛春梅 ,
  • 闫一博 ,
  • 牛军军 ,
  • 王青
展开
  • (1. 河海大学 公共管理学院;2. 河海大学 商学院,江苏 南京 210024)
毛春梅(1968—),女,江苏南通人,博士,河海大学公共管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为技术创新管理、资源与环境管理;闫一博(1999—),男,河南长垣人,河海大学商学院博士研究生,研究方向为技术创新管理;牛军军(1993—),女,安徽阜阳人,河海大学公共管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为资源与环境管理;王青(1998—),女,安徽安庆人,河海大学公共管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为资源与环境管理。通讯作者:闫一博。

收稿日期: 2025-01-23

  修回日期: 2025-04-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-25

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重点项目(20AGL036)

How Data Assets Enhance Corporate Green Innovation Capabilities: Causal Inference Based on a Double Machine Learning Model

  • Mao Chunmei ,
  • Yan Yibo ,
  • Niu Junjun ,
  • Wang Qing
Expand
  • (1.School of Public Administration, Hohai University;2.School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

Received date: 2025-01-23

  Revised date: 2025-04-30

  Online published: 2025-10-25

摘要

随着数字经济发展,数据资产已成为企业核心生产要素。基于中国上市企业数据,构建双重机器学习模型,探究数据资产对提升企业绿色创新能力的因果效应及作用机制。结果表明,数据资产显著提升企业绿色创新能力,经过稳健性检验后该结论依然成立。机制分析表明,数据资产通过优化人力资本结构促进绿色创新能力提升;ESG表现、数字基础设施、行业竞争正向调节数据资产对绿色创新能力的促进作用。异质性分析表明,数据资产对企业绿色创新能力的提升作用在超大/特大/大城市企业、高科技企业、国有企业和规模较大企业中更显著。研究不仅揭示了数据资产提升企业绿色创新能力的机制路径,更为通过优化数据要素配置促进企业绿色转型提供了政策启示。

本文引用格式

毛春梅 , 闫一博 , 牛军军 , 王青 . 数据资产何以提升企业绿色创新能力——基于双重机器学习模型的因果推断[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(20) : 1 -10 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.D22025010644

Abstract

Under the guidance of China's "dual carbon" goals, green innovation has emerged as a core driver for the low-carbon transformation of the economy and society, while the traditional pollution control model is shifting toward a more value-creating green development paradigm that emphasizes sustainable growth and innovation. The intensification of global trade frictions has hindered the international flow of green technologies, making the enhancement of independent innovation capabilities a critical pathway to achieving carbon neutrality. However, green innovation is characterized by high investment, long cycles, and significant risks, and these characteristics frequently lead to unsustainable corporate investment decisions, particularly under short-term operational pressures, thereby creating persistent bottlenecks in innovation advancement. The rapid adoption of digital technologies in recent years offers a new breakthrough to address this challenge. Against the backdrop of digital transformation, data, as a core resource, is permeating various industries, becoming the key link between digital industrialization and industrial digitization. Data assets, with their attributes of infinite supply, low-cost reuse, and cross-spatiotemporal sharing, can effectively reduce the trial-and-error costs of green innovation, enhance technological synergies, and drive breakthroughs in energy conservation, emission reduction, and circular economy.
Meanwhile, the transformation of data assets into green innovation outcomes is influenced by multiple factors. High-quality digital talent is essential for unlocking data value, while robust digital infrastructure improves data allocation efficiency. Moderate market competition drives corporate innovation, and strong ESG performance steers data resources toward sustainable development. Existing research has examined the impact of digital finance, the digital economy, and digital policies on green innovation. However, studies on data assets remain largely theoretical, focusing on accounting, valuation, and economic effects, and empirical research in this domain is still in its infancy, particularly concerning the intricate relationship between data assets and corporate green innovation. A deeper understanding of how data assets empower green innovation is crucial for enriching the theoretical framework surrounding data marketization but also for providing actionable insights to policymakers. By better understanding this relationship, policymakers can more effectively align digital economy strategies with sustainability objectives, which is of paramount importance in the context of achieving China's “dual carbon” goals.
Against this backdrop, this study employs the double machine learning model to examine the causal effects and mechanisms through which data assets influence corporate green innovation capabilities. Empirical results demonstrate that data assets significantly enhance green innovation, a finding that remains robust across a series of tests. The analysis reveals that data assets improve green innovation by optimizing human capital structure, particularly in firms with higher ESG performance, where the effect is stronger due to their emphasis on sustainable development and technological advancement. Additionally, digital infrastructure strengthens this relationship by improving the allocation efficiency of data resources, while intensified industry competition further amplifies the effect by increasing firms' sensitivity to technological innovation. Nevertheless, the magnitude of this impact varies across different firm types and regions due to differences in resource endowments and technological readiness: enterprises in megacities, high-tech firms, state-owned enterprises, and large corporations benefit more significantly, likely due to their greater access to resources and technological infrastructure; whereas small and medium-sized city enterprises, non-high-tech firms, non-state-owned enterprises, and smaller businesses exhibit weaker effects due to differences in resource endowments and technological readiness. This study not only uncovers the mechanisms driving green innovation through data assets but also offers policy insights for facilitating corporate green transformation through optimized data resource allocation.
The contributions of this study lie in its integration of data assets as a new production factor and its methodological innovation through the application of double machine learning, addressing limitations in traditional econometric approaches. By clarifying how skilled labor mediates the relationship between data assets and green innovation, it demystifies the role of human capital in fostering technological breakthroughs. Moreover, by examining contextual moderators such as ESG performance, industry competition, and digital infrastructure, the study provides actionable guidance for firms across diverse sectors and regions, informing strategies for leveraging data assets to advance sustainable development objectives.

参考文献

[1] 王海花, 谭钦瀛, 李烨. 数字技术应用、绿色创新与企业可持续发展绩效——制度压力的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(7): 124-135.
[2] 严翔, 黄永春, 胡世亮, 等. 绿色技术转移何以抑制碳排放——基于长三角城市的经验证据[J].管理评论, 2023, 35(8): 171-183.
[3] LI J C, LIAN G H, XU A T. How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? mechanism discussion and performance study[J].Journal of Business Research, 2023, 158: 113648.
[4] HANNILA H, SILVOLA R, HARKONEN J, et al. Data-driven begins with DATA potential of data assets[J].Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2022, 62(1): 29-38.
[5] 翟华云, 刘易斯. 数字金融发展、融资约束与企业绿色创新关系研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(17): 116-124.
[6] 华淑名, 李京泽. 数字经济条件下环境规制工具能否实现企业绿色技术创新的“提质增量”[J].科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(8): 141-150.
[7] 肖仁桥, 崔琦, 钱丽. “宽带中国” 试点政策对企业绿色创新的影响——数字金融、数字化转型的中介效应[J].科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(17): 117-126.
[8] 李健, 董小凡, 张金林, 等. 数据资产对企业创新投入的影响研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(12): 18-33.
[9] WU J, XIA Q, LI Z Y. Green innovation and enterprise green total factor productivity at a micro level: a perspective of technical distance[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 344: 131070.
[10] HIMEUR Y, ELNOUR M, FADLI F, et al. AI-big data analytics for building automation and management systems: a survey, actual challenges and future perspectives[J].Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(6): 4929-5021.
[11] 朱劲松,刘钰莹,郑旭.同行绿色转型是否会倒逼企业绿色创新——基于文本挖掘的溢出效应分析[J/OL].系统管理学报,1-23[2025-04-09].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1977.N.20241227.1714.002.html.
[12] 毛维. 数据资产与工业企业绿色创新[J].中国集体经济, 2022,48(13): 29-31.
[13] 苑泽明, 宋雨倩, 于翔. 数据资产共享、供应链配置多元化与企业价值[J].统计与决策, 2024, 40(17): 172-177.
[14] ZHOU W, ZHUANG Y, CHEN Y. How does artificial intelligence affect pollutant emissions by improving energy efficiency and developing green technology[J].Energy Economics, 2024, 131: 107355.
[15] BECKER G S. Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1962, 70(5): 9-49.
[16] AUTOR D H. Why are there still so many jobs? the history and future of workplace automation[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2015, 29(3): 3-30.
[17] WANG Y C, KUNG L, BYRD T A. Big data analytics: understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 126: 3-13.
[18] 潘凯, 张星星. 数字经济赋能共同富裕的作用机制分析[J].江汉论坛, 2024,67(6): 27-32.
[19] 张涛, 李均超. 网络基础设施、包容性绿色增长与地区差距——基于双重机器学习的因果推断[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(4): 113-135.
[20] 于翔, 牛彪, 苑泽明. 数据资产、人力资本升级与企业价值[J].中南财经政法大学学报, 2024,67(2): 109-122.
[21] 张济平, 李增福. 供应链数字化、供应链整合与企业绿色转型[J].华东经济管理, 2024, 38(11): 84-95.
[22] 程时雄, 何宇航. 自然灾害对城市经济增长的影响研究: 以洪涝灾害为例[J].中国软科学, 2024,39(10): 109-126.
[23] 马苓, 刘硕, 郑敏娜. 企业数字化转型、绿色创新与碳绩效——碳排放权交易政策与公众环境关注度的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(2): 63-73.
[24] 王家庭, 盛楠. 数字化转型推动企业绿色创新——基于信息效应、资源效应与技术效应的分析[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(5): 113-130.
[25] 陈瑛, 唐堂, 陈子琦. 技能还是学历——人力资本结构与企业数字化转型[J].产业经济评论, 2025,13(1): 143-161.
[26] BIA M, HUBER M, LAFFRS L. Double machine learning for sample selection models[J].Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2024, 42(3): 958-969.
[27] 周建平, 徐维祥, 郭加新. 城市知识创新网络对新质生产力形成的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2025, 46(2): 53-63.
[28] 卢艳秋, 闫心怡, 陈傲. 因利乘便: 重污染企业绿色双元创新驱动路径[J].科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(24): 96-106.
[29] 姚凯, 王亚娟. 海归高管与企业国际化——基于我国高科技上市公司的实证研究[J].经济理论与经济管理, 2020, 40(11): 55-71.
[30] 罗宇, 张明昂. 环境规制与企业纳税遵从: 效应、机制与改善路径[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(8): 175-196.
文章导航

/