企业科技创新

企业ESG表现对绿色创新质量的影响及作用机制

  • 钱丽 ,
  • 严润玥 ,
  • 肖仁桥
展开
  • (1.安徽财经大学 工商管理学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030;2.华中科技大学 管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074)
钱丽(1981—),女,湖北武汉人,博士,安徽财经大学工商管理学院教授、硕士生导师,研究方向为绿色创新管理;严润玥(2000—),女,安徽合肥人,安徽财经大学工商管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为绿色创新管理;肖仁桥(1982—),男,湖北武汉人,博士,安徽财经大学工商管理学院副院长、教授、硕士生导师,华中科技大学管理学院研究员,研究方向为绿色创新管理。

收稿日期: 2024-07-15

  修回日期: 2024-10-23

  网络出版日期: 2025-08-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BJY252,23BGL065);安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目(AHSKY2021D129);安徽省高校优秀科研创新团队项目(2022AH010041);安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(ACYC2023018)

The Impact of Enterprise ESG Performance on the Quality of Green Innovation and Its Mechanisms

  • Qian Li ,
  • Yan Runyue ,
  • Xiao Renqiao
Expand
  • (1.School of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China;2.School of Management, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Received date: 2024-07-15

  Revised date: 2024-10-23

  Online published: 2025-08-10

摘要

基于利益相关者理论,选取2010—2022年中国A股上市公司面板数据为研究样本,利用双向固定效应模型实证分析企业ESG表现对绿色创新质量的影响及作用机制。研究结果表明:企业ESG表现能够显著促进企业绿色创新质量提升,经过工具变量法、PSM检验等一系列稳健性检验,结论依然成立;企业ESG表现对绿色创新的影响具有企业、行业、ESG水平和绿色创新质量异质性,企业ESG表现对大规模企业、非国有企业、非重污染企业、低ESG水平以及高绿色创新质量企业的促进作用更显著;企业ESG表现通过增加内部资金获取、人才集聚和加强外部社会监督促进企业绿色创新质量提升,其中,社会监督的传导作用最强,其次是资金获取,而人才集聚的作用最弱;环境规制在企业ESG表现促进绿色创新质量提升中具有显著负向调节作用。

本文引用格式

钱丽 , 严润玥 , 肖仁桥 . 企业ESG表现对绿色创新质量的影响及作用机制[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(15) : 108 -118 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.Q202407193

Abstract

Against the backdrop of “carbon peak and carbon neutrality”, China is accelerating the construction of a green, low-carbon and circular development economic system.This effort is designed to catalyze a shift in economic development paradigms through the lens of green innovation. While corporate investment in green innovation has seen a sustained increase, and the volume of green innovations has surged, and there are strategic green innovation behaviors funded by patent policies, resulting in enterprises focusing on the quantity of innovation while ignoring the improvement of innovation quality. Therefore, exploring how enterprises can improve the quality of green innovation and realize the "win-win" of economic and environmental benefits has become the focus of current research.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG), as a comprehensive framework for evaluating the sustainable development of enterprises, can significantly enhance investor confidence, improve consumer loyalty, and then bring economic benefits and social influence to enterprises. Its disclosure level is also increasing year by year. Does enterprise ESG performance have a positive impact on the quality of green innovation? Is the impact heterogeneous among different types of enterprises? What is the underlying mechanism of action? Answering the above questions is helpful to grasp the mechanism of ESG performance of enterprises as a whole, and improve the quality of green innovation of enterprises.
Following stakeholder theory, this study selects panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2021 as the research sample, and uses a two-way fixed effects model to empirically analyze the impact and mechanism of enterprise ESG performance on the quality of green innovation. It employs the patent knowledge breadth method to measure the quality of green innovation as the dependent variable enterprises, and uses the Huazhong ESG rating index to reflect the ESG performance of Chinese listed companies as the explanatory variable. The results show that enterprise ESG performance can significantly promote the green innovation quality. After a series of robustness tests such as instrumental variable method and PSM test, the conclusion still holds true. Moreover, the impact of enterprise ESG performance on green innovation varies across enterprises, industries, ESG levels, and green innovation quality. Corporate ESG performance has a more significant promoting effect on large-scale, non-state-owned enterprises, non heavy polluting enterprises, low ESG levels, and high green innovation quality enterprises. Furthermore, the ESG performance of enterprise promotes the improvement of green innovation quality by increasing internal funding acquisition, talent agglomeration, and strengthening external social supervision. Among them, the transmission effect of social supervision is the strongest, followed by fund acquisition, while the role of talent agglomeration is the weakest. Environmental regulations have a significant negative moderating effect on promoting the improvement of green innovation quality in ESG performance.
Drawing from the conclusions presented, this study offers a series of strategic recommendations. Enterprises are encouraged to, firstly, establish a sustainable development oriented ESG disclosure system, an ESG data collection and monitoring systems based on international standards, a special ESG management committee, and an internal evaluation mechanism. Secondly, differentiated strategies should be adopted according to the characteristics of different enterprises. For example, small-scale enterprises should strengthen cooperation with universities and research institutions; state-owned enterprises can further clarify property rights and management responsibilities; heavy polluting enterprises should develop and apply advanced emission reduction technologies and clean energy; enterprises with high ESG levels can participate in technical cooperation R&D projects and technical forums; low green innovation quality enterprises should establish an environmental and social responsibility office or team to focus on monitoring and improving ESG performance. The government needs to strengthen the synergy of environmental policies and encourage enterprises to improve their ESG performance. Finally, in order to improve the quality of green innovation, enterprises can increase environmental protection awareness to foster a culture of environmental stewardship, use multi-channel financing to reduce costs, and emphasize the utilization of talent agglomeration effect.

参考文献

[1] 用新的伟大奋斗创造新的伟业——党的二十大报告关键词[N].人民日报,2022-10-17(8).
[2] 王磊,景诗龙,邓芳芳.营商环境优化对企业创新效率的影响研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2022,42(6):1601-1615.
[3] 张杰,陈容,郑姣姣.策略性创新抑或真实性创新——来自中国企业设立研发机构的证据[J].经济管理,2022,44(3):5-23.
[4] 胡洁,于宪荣,韩一鸣.ESG评级能否促进企业绿色转型——基于多时点双重差分法的验证[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(7):90-111.
[5] 谢红军,吕雪.负责任的国际投资:ESG与中国OFDI[J].经济研究,2022,57(3):83-99.
[6] BANK T W .Who cares wins : connecting financial markets to a changing world[C]. Working Paper, 2017.
[7] 黄世忠,叶丰滢.ESG报告基本假设初探[J].会计研究,2023,44(5):22-32.
[8] GILLAN S L, KOCH A, STARKS L T. Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2021,66(3):101889.
[9] LI J, LIAN G, XU A. How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? mechanism discussion and performance study[J].Journal of Business Research,2023,158:113648.
[10] PEDERSEN L, FITZGIBBONS H S, POMORSKI L. Responsible investing: the ESG-efficient frontier[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2021, 142(2): 572-597.
[11] 刘军伟,梁秋宸,刘华.ESG信息披露双元动机对企业绿色创新绩效的影响——绿色形象的中介作用与价值认知的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2025,42(1):113-121.
[12] CAI L J, CUI H. Corporate environmental responsibility and firm risk[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2016,135(3): 563-594.
[13] CHAN H K,YEE R W Y, DAI J, et al. The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 181:384-391.
[14] 杨阳,曾刚,葛世帅,等.国内外绿色创新研究进展与展望[J].经济地理, 2022,42(3):10-21.
[15] 杨虎涛.数字经济的增长效能与中国经济高质量发展研究[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2020,26(3):21-32.
[16] OBOBISA E S, CHEN H, MENSAH I A.The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 180:121670.
[17] 陶锋,赵锦瑜,周浩.环境规制实现了绿色技术创新的“增量提质”吗——来自环保目标责任制的证据[J].中国工业经济,2021,38(2):136-154.
[18] 李清,陈琳.ESG评级不确定性对企业绿色创新的影响研究[J].管理学报,2024,21(12):1820-1829.
[19] 杨菁菁,胡锦.ESG表现对企业绿色创新的影响[J].环境经济研究,2022,7(2):66-88.
[20] TAN Y, ZHU Z. The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: the mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness[J].Technology in Society, 2022,68:101906.
[21] 龙子午,张晓菲.ESG表现对企业绿色技术创新的影响——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J].南方金融,2023,23(9):56-70.
[22] 李井林,阳镇,陈劲.ESG表现如何赋能企业绿色技术创新——来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J].管理工程学报,2024,38(5):1-17.
[23] 赵沁娜,李航.ESG评级是否促进了企业绿色技术创新——来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J].南方经济,2024,42(2):116-135.
[24] 朱鹏,郭文凤.环境信息披露质量对绿色创新的影响[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2022,43(6):92-101.
[25] LINS K V, SERVAES H, TAMAYO A. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: the value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis[J].The Journal of Finance, 2017, 72(4): 1785-1824.
[26] LI S, PAULRAJ A, SHANG K. Proactive environmental strategies and performance: role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(7): 2136-2151.
[27] 朱小刚,刘博,刘春年.数字化提升企业绿色创新质量的机制研究[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2024,26(1):18-33.
[28] 徐凤敏,景奎,李雪鹏.“双碳”目标背景下基于ESG整合的投资组合研究[J].金融研究,2023,66(8):149-169.
[29] 钱丽,汪美鑫,肖仁桥.低碳试点政策对城市碳中和技术创新的影响及溢出效应[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(21):108-119.
[30] 彭百川,张颖,王治.企业ESG表现对绿色创新效率的影响研究[J].统计与决策,2024,40(5):172-176.
[31] 丁声怿,白俊红.企业ESG表现与绿色全要素生产率[J].产业经济评论,2024,12(3):135-154.
[32] 肖土盛,孙瑞琦,袁淳,等.企业数字化转型、人力资本结构调整与劳动收入份额[J].管理世界,2022,38(12):220-237.
[33] 李亚兵,夏月,赵振.高管绿色认知对重污染行业企业绩效的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(7):113-123.
[34] 王福胜,王也,刘仕煜.媒体关注、管理者过度自信对盈余管理的影响研究[J].管理学报,2022,19(6):832-840.
文章导航

/