人工智能与创新专栏

人工智能赋能产业创新生态系统动态演进:驱动因素与具体路径

  • 刘云 ,
  • 房浩超
展开
  • (中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院,北京 100190)
刘云(1963—),男,安徽合肥人,博士,中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院教授、副院长,研究方向为科技政策、科技评价、创新管理;房浩超(1991—),女,山东临沂人,中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为科技政策、创新管理。通讯作者:房浩超。

收稿日期: 2024-04-29

  修回日期: 2024-09-03

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA016);国家自然科学基金项目(72474206)

The Dynamic Evolution of Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Industrial Innovation Ecosystem:Driving Factors and Specific Paths

  • Liu Yun ,
  • Fang Haochao
Expand
  • (Institute of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China)

Received date: 2024-04-29

  Revised date: 2024-09-03

  Online published: 2025-07-10

摘要

随着人工智能赋能的逐渐深化,产业创新生态系统不断演进。然而,当前对人工智能赋能产业创新生态系统演进内在驱动因素及路径的探讨尚不深入。选取生物医药产业作为案例研究对象,将人工智能应用划分为技术积累期、融合期和产业赋能期,揭示不同赋能阶段产业创新生态系统演进动因与路径。研究发现:①技术积累期由市场竞争引发的生存压力驱动,实现技术单点突破;②技术融合期由政策指引的创新战略驱动,形成端到端的研发模式;③产业赋能期由技术引领的多维合力驱动,形成“AI+自动化实验+专家经验”的模式。研究结论有助于丰富产业创新生态系统理论,为更好地推动人工智能应用、促进产业创新发展提供实践启示。

本文引用格式

刘云 , 房浩超 . 人工智能赋能产业创新生态系统动态演进:驱动因素与具体路径[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(13) : 1 -13 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2024040760

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors, including autonomous vehicles, finance, and biomedicine, has catalyzed significant shifts and advancements in both established and burgeoning industries.Building and developing an innovation ecosystem is an important strategy for countries to promote innovation and development. The application of artificial intelligence can drive technological innovation at the source, attract multiple stakeholders to participate in value creation, integrate innovation resources, and jointly build an innovation ecosystem. With the gradual deepening of artificial intelligence empowerment, it has promoted the dynamic evolution of innovation ecosystems and posed new challenges to the theory of innovation ecosystems. The particularity of artificial intelligence technology has led to a lack of in-depth and systematic research on its specific application process and characteristics in the innovation ecosystem, and the internal driving factors and paths for the evolution of the industrial innovation ecosystem empowered by artificial intelligence are not yet fully understood.This paper adopts a longitudinal single case study method with the biopharmaceutical industry as the case study object. The application of artificial intelligence is divided into a technology accumulation period, an integration period, and an industry empowerment period. From a dynamic perspective, the driving factors and paths of the evolution of the biopharmaceutical industry empowered by artificial intelligence are explored, providing theoretical support and practical guidance for promoting the continuous optimization and upgrading of the industrial innovation ecosystem.The results show that (1) policy guidance, technology promotion, market pull, and organizational change jointly drive the evolution of the innovation ecosystem, and the dominant driving factors that play a role vary in different stages of artificial intelligence technology. (2) Artificial intelligence promotes the evolution of innovation ecosystems through pattern innovation, and innovation patterns achieve a comprehensive transformation from point to end and then to automation. (3) The period of technological accumulation is driven by the survival pressure caused by market competition, achieving a single point breakthrough in technology; the technology integration period is driven by policy-guided innovation strategies, achieving an end-to-end research and development model; and the industrial empowerment period is driven by multidimensional synergy led by technology, achieving a model of "AI+automated experiments+expert experience".The novelties of this paper are as follows: Given the lack of industry analysis at the meso level under technological background in the existing research , this paper conducts case studies on the biopharmaceutical industry to analyze the driving factors and paths of the evolution of artificial intelligence enabled industrial innovation ecosystems, expanding the theoretical research on industrial innovation ecosystems. Moreover, it divides the technology empowerment stage into technology accumulation stage, technology integration stage, and industry empowerment stage, and expands the research on innovation ecosystems from a dynamic perspective. Finally, due to the particularity of artificial intelligence technology, there is a lack of systematic research on the driving factors and paths for the evolution of AI-empowered industrial innovation ecosystems domestically and internationally. This study analyzes the evolution process of the innovation ecosystem in the biopharmaceutical industry, and through model innovation, it facilitates the evolution of the innovation ecosystem.The deep empowerment of artificial intelligence technology and the deep integration of artificial intelligence and industrial innovation ecosystem are the fundamental guarantees for promoting the prosperous and orderly development of industries. At the government level, it is necessary to guide the application of artificial intelligence in different industries, considering the focus of different policies such as supply, demand, and environment. At different stages of technological development, efforts should be made to shift from encouraging technological development to emphasizing regulation, and then to achieving balanced development. At the enterprise level, it is necessary to actively layout artificial intelligence, adjust organizational structure in a timely manner according to the policies and market environment, and achieve a dual wheel drive of "technology+mode". At the same time, in the future, multiple case studies or large-scale empirical studies can also be used to test the research conclusions of this article, further tracking the laws and mechanisms of change, and exploring the empowerment of the biopharmaceutical industry by artificial intelligence from different perspectives.

参考文献

[1] 霍治方,刘刚.智能化转型背景下自动驾驶产业化的中国实践[J].中国科技论坛,2024,40(7):95-109.
[2] 汪寿阳,李明琛,杨昆,等.ChatGPT+金融:八个值得关注的研究方向与问题[J].管理评论,2023,35(4):3-11.
[3] 王茜,李东巧,刘细文.ChatGPT技术在生物医药领域的应用潜力与风险[J].中国科学基金,2024,38(1):200-210.
[4] ROB TOEWS.The next frontier for large language models is biology[EB/OL].[2023-07-16]/.https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2023/07/16/the-next-frontier-for-large-language-models-is-biology/.
[5] BELTAGUI A, ROSLI A, CANDI M. Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: the disruptive impacts of 3D printing[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(1): 103833.
[6] 戎珂,柳卸林,魏江,等.数字经济时代创新生态系统研究[J].管理工程学报,2023,37(6):1-7.
[7] 欧春尧,邵业,曹阳春,等.数智赋能下海上风电产业创新生态系统演化过程研究——基于明阳智能的扎根分析[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(15):128-137.
[8] 杨柏,陈银忠,李海燕.数字化转型下创新生态系统演进的驱动机制[J].科研管理,2023,44(5):62-69.
[9] 关婷, 薛澜, 赵静. 技术赋能的治理创新:基于中国环境领域的实践案例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019,35(4): 58-65.
[10] BREIDBACH C F,REEFKE H,WIDMER T.Service supply chain configurations: from agile to efficient value networks[C].The Routledge Handbook of Service Research Insights and Ideas,2020:241-256.
[11] CHENG H, JIA R, LI D, et al. The rise of robots in China[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2019, 33(2):71-88.
[12] GLUECKLER J, HAMMER I.A pragmatic service typology: capturing the distinctive dynamics of services in time and space[J].Service Industries Journal, 2011,31(5-6):941-957.
[13] ADNER R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem[J].Harvard Business Review,2006,84(4):98-107,148.
[14] ADNER R. Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(1): 39-58.
[15] CENNAMO C, SANTALO J. Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems[J]. Organization science, 2019, 30(3): 617-641.
[16] JACOBIDES M G, TAE C J. Kingpins, bottlenecks, and value dynamics along a sector[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(3): 889-907.
[17] CHAE B K.A general framework for studying the evolution of the digital innovation ecosystem: the case of big data[J].International Journal of Information Management,2019,45(2):83-94.
[18] 刘云, 郭栋, 黄祖广. 我国高档数控机床技术追赶的特征、机制与发展策略——基于复杂产品系统的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39 (3): 140-158.
[19] 林艳,李盈.平台型创新生态系统动态演进机理——基于“架构者”的资源编排视角[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(15):118-127.
[20] NETO J R, FIGUEIREDO C, GABRIEL B C, et al. Factors for innovation ecosystem frameworks: comprehensive organizational aspects for evolution[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 203: 123383.
[21] 武建龙,鲍萌萌,杨仲基.新兴产业颠覆性创新政策组合作用机制研究:基于创新生态系统视角[J].中国软科学,2023,38(7):44-55.
[22] 邵云飞,周湘蓉,杨雪程.从0到1:数字化如何赋能创新生态系统构建[J].技术经济,2022,41(6):44-58.
[23] 李明,王卫.场景驱动、商业模式与创新生态系统演进——基于特斯拉企业价值的逻辑起点[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(17):45-55.
[24] 汤睿,林春培,李京,等.基于资源编排的企业数字化能力与创新生态系统构建[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(16):83-94.
[25] 阮添舜,屈蓉,顾颖.数字平台生态系统下企业何以实现数字创新[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(23):82-91.
[26] 储节旺,吴蓉,李振延.数智赋能的创新生态系统构成及运行机制研究[J].情报理论与实践,2023,46(3):1-8.
[27] 王海军,贺子桐,马晓琳,等.数字化下区域创新生态系统的组织与机制演进——基于中关村科技园区的纵向案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(17):32-43.
[28] EISENHARDT K M, GRAEBNER M E.Theory building from cases:opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50:25-32.
[29] SIGGELKOW N.Persuasion with case studies[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1):20-24.
文章导航

/