新质生产力专栏

人工智能发展与新质生产力提升:理论机制与实证检验

  • 何元浪 ,
  • 袁健红
展开
  • (1.东南大学 马克思主义学院;2.东南大学 经济管理学院;3.东南大学 中国特色社会主义发展研究院,江苏 南京 211189)
何元浪(1994—),男,广西南宁人,东南大学马克思主义学院博士研究生,研究方向为人工智能与创新经济;袁健红(1966—),女,江苏苏州人,博士,东南大学经济管理学院党委书记,东南大学中国特色社会主义发展研究院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为创新管理。

收稿日期: 2024-05-11

  修回日期: 2024-09-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(24BKS153)

Artificial Intelligence Development and the Enhancement of New Quality Productive Forces:The Theoretical Mechanism and an Empirical Test

  • He Yuanlang ,
  • Yuan Jianhong
Expand
  • (1.School of Marxism, Southeast University;2.School of Economic and Management,Southeast University; 3.Institute for the Development of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics,Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

Received date: 2024-05-11

  Revised date: 2024-09-25

  Online published: 2025-06-10

摘要

新一轮科技革命加速演进背景下,人工智能作为新型劳动工具的典型代表,符合新质生产力发展要求。分析人工智能影响新质生产力的理论机制,并基于2010—2022年中国内地30个省份面板数据和国际机器人联合会(IFR)的工业机器人数据,利用双向固定模型和工具变量法进行实证检验。研究发现:人工智能发展能够显著促进新质生产力提升,并且这一结论经过一系列稳健性检验和内生性检验后依然成立。机制分析发现,人工智能主要通过增强创新能力、改善能源效率和提高数字化水平3个渠道促进新质生产力提升。异质性分析发现,人工智能对新质生产力的带动效应在市场化程度高、技术聚集程度高和产业结构优化水平高的地区更显著。最后,针对发展人工智能、促进新质生产力发展提出对策建议:完善市场经济基础制度,创设有利于人工智能企业发展的营商环境;加快发展人工智能技术,持续推动产业结构优化升级;搭建人工智能创新应用场景,加大人工智能技术推广应用力度。

本文引用格式

何元浪 , 袁健红 . 人工智能发展与新质生产力提升:理论机制与实证检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025 , 42(11) : 1 -11 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.L2024XZ589

Abstract

New quality productive forces refer to modern advanced productive forces that have been created through revolutionary technological breakthroughs, innovative allocation of production factors, and deep transformation and upgrading of industries, the core essence of which is the qualitative transformation of the three elements of workers,means of labor, and labor objects and their optimal combination, and the most significant symbol of which is a significant increase in total factor productivity. It significantly differs from the traditional productivity of high input and high energy consumption, emphasizes key and disruptive technological breakthroughs, and is characterized by high technology, high efficiency and high quality. New quality productive forces bring about a qualitative leap in productivity and serve as the driving force for facilitating high-quality development in the new era. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) provides new ideas and new impetus for fostering new quality productive forces and promoting high-quality development. AI's ongoing development will drive technological innovation, increase production intelligence, spawn new economic sectors, and integrate with traditional industries to enhance resource allocation efficiency and labor productivity. This integration will steer traditional production models towards greater scalability and specialization, moving industries up the value chain.
The examination of artificial intelligence's influence on new quality productive forces holds substantial theoretical and practical importance. The literature review indicates that existing studies predominantly concentrate on the essence, value, and developmental priorities of new quality productivity, as well as AI's effects on productivity, economic growth, employment, and industrial structure. However, there is a scarcity of research addressing the nexus between AI and new quality productive forces, and empirical evidence on AI's role in shaping these forces is limited. The reasons and mechanisms by which AI bolsters new quality productive forces are not well understood.
This paper aims to bridge this gap by theoretically and empirically analyzing AI's impact on new quality productive forces using provincial panel data, revealing the underlying mechanisms and regional disparities in AI's promotion of new quality productive forces, thereby enriching and advancing the discourse on AI and new quality productive forces. This study focuses on 30 provincial administrative regions in China. Data limitations preclude the inclusion of Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, while Xizang is omitted due to incomplete data records. To ensure data consistency and completeness, linear interpolation is applied to estimate missing values in certain provinces; any unfillable gaps are addressed by listwise deletion, ensuring the reliability of the analysis.
The findings suggest that the development of AI can significantly contribute to the improvement of new quality productive forces. The robustness of the findings of this study is verified by conducting robustness tests,shortening the sample period, replacing the explanatory variable, adding control variables, and removing extreme values. In addition, the study employs the number of robots installed in the U.S. as the instrument variable to address potential endogeneity issues in the model and ensure that the estimates are unbiased. Through mechanism analysis, it reveals that AI contributes to new quality productive forces through three main channels: improving innovation, improving energy efficiency, and improving digitization. Through heterogeneity analysis, the study further finds that the driving effect of AI on new quality productive forces is more significant in regions with high marketization, high technology aggregation, and high industrial structure optimization.
This paper deepens the theoretical mechanisms by which AI promotes new quality productive forces on the basis of the existing literature and provides strong empirical evidence for the new quality productive forces effect of AI through empirical tests. Further, this study explores the fundamental question of the path through which AI mainly affects new quality productive forces within a unified framework, supporting the role of innovation capacity, energy efficiency, and digitization level in the path through which AI affects new quality productive forces, and deepens the existing literature and related studies. In accordance with the findings of the study, the paper puts forward policy recommendations conducive to the full development of AI and the promotion of new quality productive forces, which will provide important decision-making references for the development of new quality productive forces in various regions according to local conditions.

参考文献

[1] 习近平主持召开新时代推动东北全面振兴座谈会强调 牢牢把握东北的重要使命 奋力谱写东北全面振兴新篇章[N].人民日报,2023-9-10(01).
[2] 习近平在黑龙江考察时强调 牢牢把握在国家发展大局中的战略定位 奋力开创黑龙江高质量发展新局面[N].人民日报,2023-9-9(01).
[3] 刘志彪,凌永辉,孙瑞东.新质生产力下产业发展方向与战略——以江苏为例[J].南京社会科学,2023,34(11):59-66.
[4] 林晨,陈小亮,陈伟泽,等.人工智能、经济增长与居民消费改善:资本结构优化的视角[J].中国工业经济,2020,38(2):61-83.
[5] 陈劲,吕文晶.人工智能与新工科人才培养:重大转向[J].高等工程教育研究,2017,35(6):18-23.
[6] 洪银兴.发展新质生产力 建设现代化产业体系[J].当代经济研究,2024,35(2):7-9.
[7] 蒋永穆,乔张媛.新质生产力:逻辑、内涵及路径[J].社会科学研究,2024,46(1):10-18,211.
[8] 任保平,王昕.新质生产力形成中建设高标准数据要素市场的框架与路径研究[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2025,27(1):98-104.
[9] 陈彦斌,林晨,陈小亮.人工智能、老龄化与经济增长[J].经济研究,2019,54(7):47-63.
[10] ACEMOGLU D, RESTREPO P. Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2020, 128(6): 2188-2244.
[11] 姚加权,张锟澎,郭李鹏,等.人工智能如何提升企业生产效率——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J].管理世界,2024,40(2):101-116,133.
[12] AGHION P, JONES B F, JONES C I.Artificial intelligence and economic growth[D].NBER Working Paper, 2017.
[13] ACEMOGLU D, RESTREPO P.The race between man and machine:implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment[J]. American Economic Review, 2018,108(6):1488-1542.
[14] GRAETZ G, MICHAELS G.Robots at work[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2018,100(5): 753-768.
[15] 何玉长,方坤.人工智能与实体经济融合的理论阐释[J].学术月刊,2018,50(5):56-67.
[16] 张夏恒,马妍.生成式人工智能技术赋能新质生产力涌现:价值意蕴、运行机理与实践路径[J].电子政务,2024,21(4):17-25.
[17] 胡俊,杜传忠.人工智能推动产业转型升级的机制、路径及对策[J].经济纵横,2020,36(3):94-101.
[18] AUTOR D, SALOMONS A. Is automation labor-displacing? productivity growth, employment, and the labor share[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018.
[19] CALVINO F, VIRGILLITO M E.The innovation-employment nexus: a critical survey of theory and empirics[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys,2018, 32(1):83-117.
[20] 王钰,唐要家.人工智能应用如何影响企业创新宽度[J].财经问题研究,2024,46(2):38-50.
[21] 王雨辰.习近平生态文明思想视域下的“人与自然和谐共生的现代化”[J].求是学刊,2022,49(4):11-20.
[22] 郭凯明.人工智能发展、产业结构转型升级与劳动收入份额变动[J].管理世界,2019,35(7):60-77.
[23] 尹西明,陈劲,王冠.场景驱动:面向新质生产力的数据要素市场化配置新机制[J].社会科学辑刊,2024,46(3):178-188.
[24] 周文,韩文龙.数字财富的创造、分配与共同富裕[J].中国社会科学,2023,44(10):4-23,204.
[25] 闫雪凌,朱博楷,马超.工业机器人使用与制造业就业:来自中国的证据[J].统计研究,2020,37(1):74-87.
[26] 卢江,郭子昂,王煜萍.新质生产力发展水平、区域差异与提升路径[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2024,30(3):1-17.
[27] 王永钦,董雯.机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场——来自制造业上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2020,55(10):159-175.
[28] 杨飞,范从来.产业智能化是否有利于中国益贫式发展[J].经济研究,2020,55(5):150-165.
[29] 黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济,2019,37(8):5-23.
[30] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020,36(10):65-76.
[31] 刘军,杨渊鋆,张三峰.中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究[J].上海经济研究,2020,39(6):81-96.
[32] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022,40(5):100-120.
[33] 寇宗来,刘学悦.中国企业的专利行为:特征事实以及来自创新政策的影响[J].经济研究,2020,55(3):83-99.
[34] 喻登科,祝可,肖欢.CEO知性特质与企业数字化转型关系研究[J/OL].科技进步与对策,1-11[2025-05-29].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20240708.1556.004.html.
[35] 李应博.两岸科技合作治理的知识场域:范式构建与时空演进[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(24):119-129.
文章导航

/