The urban agglomerations of the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta are the power sources and growth poles of regional economic development. Their green innovation strategies play a crucial role in driving the surrounding areas. Among them, the economic strength and innovative elements of the two urban agglomerations are concentrated, making them key spatial carriers for strengthening the integration of intellectual property protection in the Yangtze River Delta region during the implementation of the "14th Five-Year Plan", and promoting the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area as an international cooperation highland for intellectual property. As the leaders in promoting the integrated development of major national regional strategies, the construction and improvement of the green innovation pattern within urban agglomerations is particularly important. How to effectively rely on intellectual property protection to accelerate and assist the development of green innovation has become a breakthrough point in promoting high-quality economic development and building a new development pattern. The existing literature emphasizes examining the empowering mechanism of IPR protection for green innovation processes from a national, provincial, industrial, and enterprise perspective. There is a lack of further exploration of the nonlinear relationship between IPR protection and urban green innovation at the city level.
This study focuses on the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta urban clusters, analyzing the driving effects of IPR protection on the development of urban green innovation and its internal mechanisms based on panel data from 2010 to 2021, using spatial Durbin models and threshold models. The study finds that (1) the empowering effect of IPR protection on urban green innovation is continuously changing. As the level of IPR protection increases, the driving effect changes from "incentive effect" to "crowding-out effect", and its negative hindering effect shows a trend of increasing strength. In the Pearl River Delta urban cluster, there is a more complex inverted "U" relationship between the two, while no significant nonlinear evolution is found in the Yangtze River Delta. (2) The spillover effect of IPR protection has significant spatial heterogeneity. In the Pearl River Delta urban cluster, local IPR protection has a "stimulating effect" on the development of adjacent urban green innovation, while the Yangtze River Delta urban cluster shows a "crowding-out effect". (3) IPR protection is conducive to promoting the quality improvement of green innovation, which means that under more stringent IPR protection, cities tend to conduct substantive green innovation rather than strategic green innovation. (4) The mechanism test shows that the improvement of IPR protection level induces R&D personnel and funding inputs, promoting the improvement of urban green innovation capabilities based on existing innovation activities.
With a focus on the two largest city clusters in China, namely the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, this study employs kernel density estimation and exploratory spatial analysis tools to analyze the spatial and temporal differentiation of green innovation efficiency and intellectual property protection level within these two city clusters, providing a more refined characterization of the green innovation efficiency and intellectual property protection level at the urban scale from the input-output perspective of expected and unexpected output, as well as the perspective of technology transaction market. Then, by incorporating intellectual property protection into the analysis framework of green innovation development, the study explores the incentive and crowding-out effects of intellectual property protection in driving the green innovation process, from the perspectives of heterogeneous non-linearities and spatial interaction effects, shedding light on whether intellectual property protection can break the binary constraints of "ecology" and "innovation" in urban green innovation.Furthermore, it examines the mechanism through which intellectual property protection promotes urban green innovation by investigating the transition of green innovation status and quality, and finds that investment in research and development and research funding can enable intellectual property protection to promote green innovation, resulting in cities combining green innovation with existing innovation activities;under stricter intellectual property protection, cities tend to engage in substantive rather than strategic innovation.
[1] KUNAPATARAWONG R, MARTNEZ-ROS E.Towards green growth:how does green innovation affect employment[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(6): 1218-1232.
[2] 钱丽,王文平,肖仁桥.高质量发展视域下中国企业绿色创新效率及其技术差距[J].管理工程学报,2021,35(6):97-114.
[3] 曹霞,于娟.绿色低碳视角下中国区域创新效率研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015,25(5):10-19.
[4] 王晗,何枭吟,许舜威.创新型城市试点对绿色创新效率的影响机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(4):105-114.
[5] 李婉红.中国省域工业绿色技术创新产出的时空演化及影响因素:基于30个省域数据的实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(2):9-19.
[6] YSAMEEN H, TAN Q, ZAMEER H, et al. Exploring the impact of technological innovation, environmental regulations and urbanization on ecological efficiency of China in the context of COP21[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,274:111210.
[7] 李青原,肖泽华.异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J].经济研究,2020,55(9):192-208.
[8] AMORE M D, BENNEDSEN M. Corporate governance and green innovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2016,75: 54-72.
[9] 孙振清,李欢欢,刘保留.中国东部沿海四大城市群协同创新效率综合测度及影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(2):47-55.
[10] 董会忠,李旋,张仁杰.粤港澳大湾区绿色创新效率时空特征及驱动因素分析[J].经济地理,2021,41(5):134-144.
[11] 孙燕铭,谌思邈.长三角区域绿色技术创新效率的时空演化格局及驱动因素[J].地理研究,2021,40(10):2743-2759.
[12] 戚聿东,杜博,叶胜然.知识产权与技术标准协同驱动数字产业创新:机理与路径[J].中国工业经济,2022,39(8):5-24.
[13] WAN Q, YUAN L, YAO Z, et al. Impact of intellectual property protection on the innovation efficiency in China's hi-tech industry[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2023, 35(1): 107-122.
[14] 王海成,吕铁.知识产权司法保护与企业创新——基于广东省知识产权案件“三审合一”的准自然试验[J].管理世界,2016,32(10):118-133.
[15] GANGOPADHYAY K, MONDAL D. Does stronger protection of intellectual property stimulate innovation [J]. Economics Letters, 2012,116(1): 80-82.
[16] 彭衡,李扬.知识产权保护与中国绿色全要素生产率[J].经济体制改革,2019,37(3):18-24.
[17] 肖振红,李炎.高专利密集度制造业绿色创新路径演化分析——知识产权保护强度视角[J].管理评论,2022,34(11):88-98.
[18] 肖振红,李炎.知识产权保护、R&D投入与区域绿色创新绩效[J].系统管理学报,2022,31(2):374-383.
[19] 李雪,吴福象,竺李乐,等.互联网化、知识产权保护与区域创新产出[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(18):46-55.
[20] 庄子银,贾红静,李汛.知识产权保护对企业创新的影响研究——基于企业异质性视角[J].南开管理评论,2022, (11):1-22.
[21] XU P, ZHANG M, GUI M. How R&D financial subsidies, regional R&D input, and intellectual property protection affect the sustainable patent output of SMEs: evidence from China[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3): 1207.
[22] ANG J S, CHENG Y, WU C. Does enforcement of intellectual property rights matter in China? evidence from financing and investment choices in the high-tech industry[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014, 96(2): 332-348.
[23] NOORI J, NASRABADI M B, YAZDI N, et al. Innovative performance of Iranian knowledge-based firms: Large firms or SMEs [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 122: 179-185.
[24] 刘金科,肖翊阳.中国环境保护税与绿色创新:杠杆效应还是挤出效应 [J].经济研究,2022,57(1):72-88.
[25] LETEN B, VANHAVERBEKE W, ROIJAKKERS N, et al. IP models to orchestrate innovation ecosystems: IMEC, a public research institute in nano-electronics[J]. California Management Review, 2013, 55(4): 51-64.
[26] 林子秋,李应博.知识作用视角下城市间环境规制异质性与绿色创新质量研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(21):33-44.
[27] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51(4):60-73.
[28] 周力,沈坤荣.国家级城市群建设对绿色创新的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(8):92-99
[29] 李健,马晓芳.京津冀城市绿色创新效率时空差异及影响因素分析[J].系统工程,2019,37(5):51-61.
[30] 贾宗穆,张婧屹.研发效率、知识产权保护与经济繁荣[J].财经研究,2022,48(7):138-153.
[31] 王钰,胡海青,张琅.知识产权保护、社会网络及新创企业创新绩效[J].管理评论,2021,33(3):129-137.
[32] 李俊青,苗二森.不完全契约条件下的知识产权保护与企业出口技术复杂度[J].中国工业经济,2018,35(12):115-133.
[33] 胡凯,吴清,胡毓敏.知识产权保护的技术创新效应——基于技术交易市场视角和省级面板数据的实证分析[J].财经研究,2012,38(8):15-25.
[34] 刘思明,侯鹏,赵彦云.知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力——来自省级大中型工业企业面板数据的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015,32(3):40-57.