企业创新是资源分配和创新投入的有机统一。基于2003—2021年A股上市公司样本数据,从创新广度和创新深度两个维度深入探讨企业创新活动对全要素生产率的影响机制。结果发现:创新广度与企业全要素生产率存在倒U型关系,创新深度对企业全要素生产率具有显著正向影响。异质性研究表明,相较于国有企业,非国有企业创新深度对全要素生产率的正向影响更加显著;相较于非高技术企业,高技术企业创新广度与全要素生产率的倒U型关系曲线更加陡峭。进一步研究表明,高市场化水平情景下,创新深度对企业全要素生产率的正向影响更显著;高知识产权保护水平情景下,创新广度与企业全要素生产率的倒U型关系曲线呈现峰值提高、拐点左移的特点,创新深度对企业全要素生产率的正向影响更显著,说明高知识产权保护水平地区企业创新效应更加显著,但随之而来的创新广度“门槛”问题也更加突出。由此,提出测度企业创新活动的新视角和新方法,进一步揭示不同市场化水平、知识产权保护水平下企业创新对全要素生产率的影响,以期为相关政策制定与实施提供理论参考。
In recent years, as China transitions from a phase of high-speed economic growth to a stage of high-quality development, enhancing total factor productivity (TFP) has emerged as a critical lever for fostering sustainable economic progress. Amidst this backdrop, corporate innovation stands out as a pivotal engine driving productivity enhancements and long-term economic growth. Solow (1956) underscored the significance of TFP in economic advancement, sparking widespread exploration into the underpinnings of productivity growth. Drawing upon a rich tapestry of research that delves into various facets of corporate heterogeneity, including R&D investments, workforce demographics, and industry characteristics, this study aims to scrutinize the intricate mechanisms by which corporate innovation influences TFP. Specifically, it ventures beyond conventional linear perspectives, adopting a novel lens focused on the dimensions of innovation's breadth and depth, thereby providing a robust theoretical foundation for policy formulation and implementation.
This study harnesses a dataset comprising A-share listed companies in China spanning from 2003 to 2021. By meticulously curating a sample reflective of the broader economic landscape, this investigation offers a comprehensive overview of the nexus between corporate innovation and TFP within the Chinese context. The study employs a multi-dimensional approach to quantify corporate innovation, distinguishing between innovation's breadth and depth. The breadth of innovation, indicative of the diversity and cross-disciplinary nature of a firm's innovative endeavors, reflects the firm's ability to engage in innovation across various technological domains. Conversely, the depth of innovation encapsulates the intensity and commitment of a firm towards innovation, signifying concentrated efforts in core technological advancements and improvements in production processes. Utilizing sophisticated statistical techniques, including regression analysis and robustness checks, the study evaluates the impact of these innovation dimensions on TFP. The analytical framework is further enriched by exploring the moderating effects of ownership structure, technological intensity, marketization level, and intellectual property rights protection on the innovation-TFP relationship. The investigation uncovers an inverted U-shaped relationship between the breadth of innovation and TFP, suggesting that while diversifying innovation across different technological fields initially boosts TFP, beyond a certain threshold, it may lead to diminishing returns. In stark contrast, the depth of innovation demonstrates a consistently positive influence on TFP, underscoring the importance of concentrated innovation efforts. Furthermore, the study reveals nuanced insights into how non-state-owned corporates, compared to their state-owned counterparts, and high-tech firms, relative to lower-tech firms, exhibit distinct patterns in how innovation's breadth and depth affect TFP. These findings highlight the complexity of the innovation-productivity paradigm, influenced by corporate characteristics and the external economic environment. The research also illuminates the critical roles of marketization and intellectual property rights protection. In regions with higher levels of marketization and stronger intellectual property protection, the positive effects of innovation depth on TFP are accentuated, thereby reinforcing the argument for fostering conducive economic and legal conditions for innovation.
This study introduces an innovative lens for assessing corporate innovation, emphasizing the dual dimensions of innovation's breadth and depth. By unraveling the intricate dynamics between different facets of innovation and TFP, it extends the existing literature and offers new pathways for theoretical exploration. Moreover, the findings bear significant implications for policymakers and business leaders, advocating for targeted strategies to cultivate an ecosystem that nurtures innovation and drives productivity growth. In conclusion, this research sheds light on the multifaceted relationship between corporate innovation and TFP, contributing valuable insights into the drivers of high-quality economic development. By advocating for nuanced policies that recognize the complexity of innovation activities, this study underscores the imperative of fostering a supportive environment for innovation, tailored to the diverse needs of corporates across different sectors and developmental stages. In the following research, the sample could be expanded and the specific reasons for the formation of the inverted U-shaped relationship between firms' breadth of innovation and total factor productivity could be further explored, along with further exploration of how to optimize the depth of innovation in order to maximize its positive impact on productivity.
[1] 王海成, 张伟豪, 夏紫莹. 产业规模偏好与企业全要素生产率——来自省级政府五年规划文本的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(5): 153-171.
[2] HOPENHAYN H A. Firms, misallocation, and aggregate productivity: a review[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2014, 6(1): 735-770.
[3] ILMAKUNNAS P, MIYAKOSHI T. What are the drivers of TFP in the aging economy? aging labor and ICT capital[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2013, 41(1): 201-211.
[4] 孙华妤, 吕一清. 深圳市全要素生产率再测算及其驱动因素——基于产业及细分行业的研究[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(2): 69-74.
[5] 盛明泉, 蒋世战. 高管股权激励、技术创新与企业全要素生产率——基于制造业企业的实证分析[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2019, 37(2): 70-76.
[6] KUNG H,SCHMID L.Innovation, growth, and asset prices[J].The Journal of Finance,2015,70(3):1001-1037.
[7] 宋敏, 周鹏, 司海涛. 金融科技与企业全要素生产率——“赋能”和信贷配给的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, 38(4): 138-155.
[8] 陈维涛, 严伟涛, 庄尚文. 进口贸易自由化、企业创新与全要素生产率[J]. 世界经济研究, 2018, 37(8): 62-73,136.
[9] AYERST S. Innovator heterogeneity, R&D misallocation and the productivity growth slowdown[R]. U.S.:International Monetary Fund, 2020.
[10] FEINBERG S E, MAJUMDAR S K. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2001, 32(3): 421-437.
[11] GOTO A, SUZUKI K. R & D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R & D in Japanese manufacturing industries[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 71(4): 555-564.
[12] 喻登科, 解佩佩, 高翔. “双碳”目标下产业结构优化对区域绿色发展的影响研究[J]. 创新科技, 2022, 22(9): 50-59.
[13] WANG J, ZHANG Q, LI Q. R&D investment and total factor productivity: an empirical study of the listed companies in the coastal regions of China[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2020, SI(106): 13-23.
[14] 孔东民, 庞立让. 研发投入对生产率提升的滞后效应:来自工业企业的微观证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2014, 13(6): 69-80,90.
[15] 叶祥松, 刘敬. 异质性研发、政府支持与中国科技创新困境[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(9): 116-132.
[16] 盛明泉, 吴少敏, 张娅楠. 探索式创新与企业全要素生产率[J]. 产业经济研究, 2020, 19(1): 28-41.
[17] 黄勃, 李海彤, 江萍, 等. 战略联盟、要素流动与企业全要素生产率提升[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(10): 195-212.
[18] 戴小勇. 中国高创新投入与低生产率之谜:资源错配视角的解释[J]. 世界经济, 2021, 44(3): 86-109.
[19] HSIEH C T, KLENOW P J. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(4): 1403-1448.
[20] JONES C I. The past and future of economic growth: a semi-endogenous perspective[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2022, 14(1): 125-152.
[21] GROSSMAN G M, HELPMAN E. Innovation and growth in the global economy[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,2001.
[22] ADAMS J D. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(4): 673-702.
[23] 刘威, 施进发. 知识密集型服务业促进制造业高质量发展效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 39(2): 29-38.
[24] 鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(2): 541-558.
[25] HALL B, JAFFE A, TRAJTENBERG M. The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools: w8498[R]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.
[26] 张杰, 郑文平. 创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(5): 28-41.
[27] 张美莎, 邸勍, 冯涛. 异质性研发、市场化程度与全要素生产率[J].科技进步与对策,2024,41(9):57-66.
[28] 郭蕾, 肖淑芳, 李雪婧, 等. 非高管员工股权激励与创新产出——基于中国上市高科技企业的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2019, 40(7): 59-67.
[29] 戴魁早, 刘友金. 市场化改革能推进产业技术进步吗——中国高技术产业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 41(2): 71-90.
[30] 李勃昕, 韩先锋, 李宁. 知识产权保护是否影响了中国OFDI逆向创新溢出效应[J]. 中国软科学, 2019, 34(3): 46-60.