In order to upgrade the industrial system, the Chinese government has been striving to accelerate the application of green technology and other key technological innovations. However, the green innovation development of China's new generation of information technology industry is facing problems of insufficiency and imbalance. On the one hand, although with the steady implementation of the "double carbon" strategy, China's industry has gradually changed its extensive development mode,the quality of green innovation is insufficient, and the unequal allocation of green innovation factors among regions has brought about the problem of multilevel differentiation, restricting the regional balance of China's industry. On the other hand, the problem of multi-level differentiation brought about by the uneven allocation of green innovation factors among regions restricts the balanced regional development of China's industries. Therefore, this paper quantifies the green innovation capability of China's new generation of information technology industry, accurately grasps the differences in green innovation capability of China's new generation of information technology industry, clarifies the formation mechanism of the evolution of the difference in green innovation capability, and provides powerful support for the construction of a green technological innovation system, the implementation of regional coordinated development strategy, and provides decision-making references for the realization of the high-quality transformation and development of the new generation of information technology industry in this new period.
On the basis of the panel data of 30 provinces from 2011 to 2021, this paper examines the level and evolution trend of green innovation capability of China's new generation information technology industry from three dimensions of green innovation resource allocation, comprehensive green innovation benefit and green innovation environmental support by using entropy value method with the spatial scales of four major segments and north-south region, and reveals the spatial differences, structural sources and formation mechanism of green innovation capability of China's new generation information technology industry with the help of Gini coefficient and its decomposition method, variance decomposition method and QAP method.
The marginal contribution of this paper includes several aspects. Firstly, with a focus on the requirements of green and low-carbon development for the development of new-generation information technology industry, it expansively incorporates the relevant indicators reflecting green development into the comprehensive measurement index system to scientifically measure the green innovation capacity of China's new-generation information technology industry, and then reveal its current situation and potential for enhancement. Secondly, the spatial differences and evolution characteristics of China's new-generation information technology industry's green innovation capacity provide a realistic basis for exploring differentiated paths of green innovation capacity enhancement. Thirdly, the variance decomposition method is used to examine the structural sources of the differences in green innovation capacity of China's new generation of information technology industry in order to reveal the key areas of synergistic enhancement of green innovation capability of the new generation of information technology industry. Fourthly, the constraints of the differences in green innovation capability of China's new-generation information technology industry are examined by the QAP method from a relational data perspective,providing decision-making reference for the establishment of a new mechanism of regionally coordinated green innovation development that is effective.
The study draws four conclusions. Firstly, from the measurement results, the level of green innovation capability of China's new generation of information technology industry has steadily risen during the sample examination period, but there is a large gap between different provinces. Secondly, from the results of Gini coefficient measurement, the regional gap in green innovation capability of China's new generation information technology industry shows a fluctuating upward trend, and the regional imbalance problem is more prominent in the eastern region. Thirdly, from the results of variance decomposition, the contribution of human capital difference is the highest; the contribution of capital input difference, economic efficiency difference, and technology creation difference is smaller. Fourthly, from the results of QAP measurement, the degrees of positive influence of human capital difference, capital input difference, economic efficiency difference, and opening-up difference on the difference in green innovation capability of the new generation information technology industry decrease in order, while the influence of industrial structure difference is negative.
[1] 李佳,王丽丽,王欢明.产业持续创新发展水平评价研究——以新一代信息技术产业为例[J].科学决策,2021,28(3):62-82.
[2] 陈松奕.高技术产业绿色创新能力评价指标体系构建及测度[J].统计与决策,2023,39(3):174-178.
[3] 李旭辉,杨梦成,严晗,等.中国人工智能产业科技创新能力测度及趋势演进[J].科研管理,2023,44(1):1-7.
[4] 李佳,王丽丽,王欢明.产业持续创新发展水平评价研究——以新一代信息技术产业为例[J].科学决策,2021,28(3):62-82.
[5] 姚孟超,段进军,张仁杰,等.中国高技术产业绿色创新效率的空间关联结构与影响机制分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(11):2345-2356.
[6] 李旭辉,赵浩玥,程刚.三大经济圈新一代信息技术产业竞争力评价与区域差异研究[J].软科学,2021,35(8):106-112.
[7] 刘亦文,欧阳莹.我国新一代信息技术产业创新效率的时空特征与动态演进[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2020,34(5):52-61.
[8] 董会忠,曹正旭,张仁杰.中国高技术产业两阶段绿色创新效率及影响因素识别[J].统计与决策,2022,38(6):44-49.
[9] 金芳,齐志豪,梁益琳.大数据、金融集聚与绿色技术创新[J].经济与管理评论,2021,37(4):97-112.
[10] 申俊喜,刘元雏.战略性新兴产业产能利用率及影响因素——以新一代信息技术产业为例[J].中国科技论坛,2019,35(3):61-70,91.
[11] CHOU S Y,CHANG Y H,SHEN C Y.A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective /subjective attributes[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2008,189(1):132-145.
[12] 喻蕾.文化产业高质量发展:评价指标体系构建及其政策意义[J].经济地理,2021,41(6):147-153.
[13] 中国社会科学院宏观经济研究中心课题组,李雪松,陆旸,等.未来15年中国经济增长潜力与“十四五”时期经济社会发展主要目标及指标研究[J].中国工业经济,2020,38(4):5-22.
[14] 刘波,李湛.中国科技创新资源配置体制机制的演进、创新与政策研究[J].科学管理研究,2021,39(4):8-16.
[15] 胡俊南,胡瑾.江西省战略性新兴产业企业绿色技术创新绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(7):33-41.
[16] 王家明,张云菲,丁浩.山东省区域创新能力时空双维实证评价研究——基于PFHWD-TOPSIS模型[J].华东经济管理,2020,34(11):18-28.
[17] 陈影,文传浩,沈体雁.成渝地区双城经济圈绿色发展效率评价及时空演变研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(5):1137-1151.
[18] 安同良,魏婕,舒欣.中国制造业企业创新测度——基于微观创新调查的跨期比较[J].中国社会科学,2020,41(3):99-122,206.
[19] 张丽琨,张亚萍,梁远.中国工业企业绿色技术创新效率的测度与评价——基于超效率网络SBM-Malmquist模型分析[J].技术经济,2022,41(7):13-22.
[20] 徐孝勇,曾恒源.中国14个集中连片特困地区县域自我发展能力测度与乡村振兴战略瞄准研究[J].农林经济管理学报,2019,18(5):684-692.
[21] 于丽英,刘宏笪,陈子璇.长江经济带绿色治理效率测度与分析——基于广义面板三阶段DEA模型[J].华东经济管理,2021,35(6):88-99.
[22] 武义青,姚连宵.京津冀区域低碳发展现状及转型路径[J].天津社会科学,2022,42(5):89-96.
[23] 徐成龙,任建兰,程钰.山东省环境规制效率时空格局演变及影响因素[J].经济地理,2014,34(12):35-40.
[24] 王班班,莫琼辉,钱浩祺.地方环境政策创新的扩散模式与实施效果——基于河长制政策扩散的微观实证[J].中国工业经济,2020,38(8):99-117.
[25] SRDJEVIC B, MEDEIROS Y D P, FARIA A S. An objective multi-criteria evaluation of water management scenarios[J]. Water Resources Management, 2004,18(1):35-54.
[26] 杨力,刘程程,宋利,等.基于熵权法的煤矿应急救援能力评价[J].中国软科学,2013,28(11):185-192.
[27] CAMILO DAGUM. A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality ratio[J]. Empirical Economics,1997,22(4):515-531.
[28] 刘华军,杜广杰.中国经济发展的地区差距与随机收敛检验——基于2000—2013年DMSP/OLS夜间灯光数据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,34(10):43-59.
[29] SCOTT J P. Social network analysis[M].London: Sage Publications,2017.
[30] 武祯妮,尹应凯.大气污染防治行动打好了资源型城市的“蓝天保卫战”吗[J].产业经济研究,2022,41(1):43-56.
[31] 陈鲁夫,邵云飞.“钻石模型”视角下战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响因素的实证研究——以新一代信息产业为例[J].技术经济,2017,36(2):1-7,116.
[32] 徐晓光,樊华,苏应生,等.中国绿色经济发展水平测度及其影响因素研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021,38(7):65-82.
[33] 裴延峰.中国产业结构变迁的空间不平衡对地区经济差距的影响[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(3):3-23.
[34] 孙燕铭,谌思邈.长三角区域绿色技术创新效率的时空演化格局及驱动因素[J].地理研究,2021,40(10):2743-2759.
[35] 聂名华,齐昊.对外直接投资能否提升中国工业绿色创新效率:基于创新价值链与空间关联的视角[J].世界经济研究,2019,38(2):111-122,137.