企业创新管理

数字化技术驱动企业战略变革机制研究——一个有调节的中介效应模型

  • 王锋正 ,
  • 刘曦萌
展开
  • (1.内蒙古大学 经济管理学院;2.内蒙古地区经济可持续发展研究基地,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010021)
王锋正(1978—),男,内蒙古包头人,博士,内蒙古大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师,内蒙古地区经济可持续发展研究基地研究员,研究方向为企业战略与创新管理、高质量创新、创新政策与环境规制;刘曦萌(1995—),男,安徽淮北人,内蒙古大学经济管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为企业战略、数字化技术与环境规制。

收稿日期: 2023-07-31

  修回日期: 2023-12-04

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(72164030);教育部创新团队发展计划项目(IRT_16R41);内蒙古自治区直属高校基本科研业务费项目(20700-54220346);内蒙古自治区高等学校创新团队发展计划支持项目(NMGIRT2415);内蒙古大学研究生科研创新重点项目(11200-54220396)

The Mechanism of Digital Technology-Driven Corporate Strategic Change: A Moderated Mediation Model

  • Wang Fengzheng ,
  • Liu Ximeng
Expand
  • (1.School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University;2.Research Base for Sustainable Economic Development of Inner Mongolia Region, Hohhot 010021, China)

Received date: 2023-07-31

  Revised date: 2023-12-04

  Online published: 2024-12-10

摘要

加快战略变革是企业响应时代号召、获取竞争新优势的必然选择。数字经济时代,明晰数字化技术驱动企业战略变革的内在机理,考察公司治理能否发挥“助推器”作用,已成为学术界关注企业数字化转型的焦点。基于战略变革理论,选取2012—2022年1350家上市公司数据,通过构建有调节的中介效应模型进行实证检验,研究发现:①数字化技术应用能够显著驱动企业战略变革,经过测量偏误、内生性等稳健性检验后该结论依然成立;②数字化技术主要通过优化资源配置、增强应变能力、降低运营成本3种机制驱动企业战略变革,公司治理能够显著增强数字化技术对3种机制的促进作用,进而驱动企业战略变革;③当企业处于成长期时,公司治理仅能增强数字化技术对降低运营成本的促进效应。当企业处于成熟期与衰退期时,公司治理有助于增强数字化技术对3种机制的促进作用。据此,企业应充分利用数字化技术实现强配置、抗波动、降成本,积极改善公司治理能力,驱动企业战略变革并获取竞争新优势。

本文引用格式

王锋正 , 刘曦萌 . 数字化技术驱动企业战略变革机制研究——一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(23) : 97 -106 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.H202307207

Abstract

China attaches great importance to the development of the digital economy,continuously promotes the deep integration of digital technology and the real economy, coordinates advances in both the digital industry and the digital transformation of traditional industries, and accelerates the building of the country's cyberspace strength and a digital China. In response to the call of the times, it is an inevitable choice for corporates to accelerate strategic change so as to implement national strategies and gain new competitive advantages. In the era of the digital economy, clarifying the inherent mechanisms of digital technology driving enterprise strategic change and examining whether corporate governance can continue to play a “catalyst” role has become one of the focuses of attention in the field of enterprise digital transformation. Corporate strategic change is a risky behavior of disruptive innovation, and achieving strategic change urgently requires scientific and sound corporate governance to safeguard the inherent needs of shareholder interests. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to clarify the impact mechanisms of digital technology application in driving strategic change and how corporate governance can ensure the smooth progress of strategic change. This is of great practical significance for enterprises to respond to the call of the times and gain new competitive advantages.
This study assumes that digital technology can drive strategic change in enterprises by optimizing resource allocation, enhancing adaptability, and reducing operating costs, and corporate governance enhances the impact of digital technology on optimizing resource allocation, enhancing adaptability, and reducing operating costs, thereby driving strategic change in enterprises. Drawing on theories such as strategic change, it selects data from 1 350 Chinese listed companies from 2012 to 2022 and uses multiple linear regression models, moderated mediation models, an instrumental variable approach, a robust two-stage least squares method under high collinearity, as well as PSM-DID to empirically test the impact mechanisms of digital technology application in driving strategic change and the moderated mediation effects of corporate governance.
Empirical evidence shows that the application of digital technology can significantly drive strategic change in companies, which is confirmed by robustness tests such as measurement bias and endogeneity. Mechanism analysis finds that digital technology mainly drives strategic change in companies through three mechanisms: optimizing resource allocation, enhancing adaptability, and reducing operational costs. The moderated mediation analysis finds that corporate governance can significantly enhance the promoting effect of digital technology on the three mechanisms, thereby driving strategic change in companies. Further research reveals that among the three moderated mediation effects, only reducing operational costs is significant in the growth stage, and all three effects are significant in the mature stage and decline stage. The research results indicate that applying digital technology for strong configuration, resilience to volatility and cost reduction in conjunction with comprehensive corporate governance is of great strategic significance for driving strategic change and gaining competitive advantages. Thus, enterprises should actively apply digital technology to empower strategic activities in the value chain, and build long-term competitiveness with digital technology as the core; digital technology is expected to play a significant role in improving their capabilities in strong configuration, resistance to fluctuations and cost reduction, and enhancing their corporate governance capabilities.
The marginal contribution of this study mainly lies in two aspects. Firstly, it explores the impact mechanisms of optimizing resource allocation, enhancing adaptive capacity, and reducing operational costs from the perspectives of production factors, tools, and processes, which enriches the research on the impact mechanisms of digital technology-driven strategic change in companies. Secondly, it provides beneficial supplements to the mechanism research on digital technology-driven strategic change in companies. On the basis of the moderated mediation model, it investigates how corporate governance enhances the promoting effect of digital technology on three mechanisms from the perspective of overall governance and conducts a heterogeneous analysis of moderated mediation effects over the lifecycle.

参考文献

[1] 陈德球, 胡晴.数字经济时代下的公司治理研究:范式创新与实践前沿[J].管理世界, 2022,38(6):213-240.
[2] 孙永祥, 黄祖辉.上市公司的股权结构与绩效[J].经济研究, 1999,34(12):23-30.
[3] 朱武祥, 宋勇.股权结构与企业价值——对家电行业上市公司实证分析[J].经济研究, 2001, 36(12): 66-72,92.
[4] ACEMOGLU D,RESTREPO P.The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment[J].American Economic Review,2018,108(6):1488-1542.
[5] 吴卫红, 杨帆, 张爱美, 等.数字化技术转型、数字化治理能力与制造业企业绿色转型升级——基于数字化赋能理论的作用机制研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2023,40(12):32-41.
[6] 吴非, 常曦, 任晓怡.政府驱动型创新:财政科技支出与企业数字化转型[J].财政研究, 2021,42(1):102-115.
[7] DEANGELO H,DEANGELO L,STULZ R M. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2006,81(2): 227-254.
[8] GRAETZ G,MICHAELS G.Is modern technology responsible for jobless recoveries[J].American Economic Review,2017,107(5):168-173.
[9] 戴翔, 马皓巍.数字化转型、出口增长与低加成率陷阱[J].中国工业经济, 2023,40(5):61-79.
[10] 范建红, 王冰, 闫乐, 等.数字普惠金融对高技术制造业创新韧性的影响——基于系统GMM与门槛效应的检验[J].科技进步与对策, 2022,39(17):51-61.
[11] 曾德麟, 蔡家玮, 欧阳桃花.数字化转型研究:整合框架与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理, 2021,43(5):63-76.
[12] 陶锋, 王欣然, 徐扬, 等.数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J].中国工业经济, 2023,40(5):118-136.
[13] 巫强, 姚雨秀.企业数字化转型与供应链配置:集中化还是多元化[J].中国工业经济, 2023,40(8):99-117.
[14] JORGENSON D W,STIROH K J.Computers and growth[J].Economics of Innovation & New Technology,1995,3(3),295-316.
[15] BEN-NASR H,BOUBAKER S,ROUATBI W.Ownership structure, control contestability, and corporate debt maturity[J].Journal of Corporate Finance,2015,35(12):265-285.
[16] MO Z.Multiple large shareholders and corporate innovation: evidence from Chinese Listed company[J].World Scientific Research Journal,2021,7(5):345-355.
[17] 张永安, 关永娟.市场需求、创新政策组合与企业创新绩效——企业生命周期视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2021,38(1):87-94.
[18] 段姝, 杨彬.财政补贴与税收优惠的创新激励效应研究——来自民营科技型企业规模与生命周期的诠释[J].科技进步与对策, 2020,37(16):120-127.
[19] 彭红枫, 米雁翔.信息不对称、信号质量与股权众筹融资绩效[J].财贸经济, 2017,38(5):80-95.
[20] KIRTLEY J,O'MAHONY S.What is a pivot? explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot[J].Strategic Management Journal,2023, 44(1):197-230.
[21] 祁怀锦, 曹修琴, 刘艳霞.数字经济对公司治理的影响——基于信息不对称和管理者非理性行为视角[J].改革, 2020,37(4):50-64.
[22] 韵江, 宁鑫, 暴莹.CEO过度自信与战略变革——基于“韧性效应”和“创造效应”的研究[J].南开管理评论, 2022,25(5):180-190.
[23] 吴小节, 曾华, 汪秀琼.多层次情境嵌入视角下的委托代理理论研究现状及发展[J].管理学报, 2017,14(6):936-946.
[24] 乔朋华, 张悦, 许为宾, 等.管理者心理韧性、战略变革与企业成长——基于香港联合证券交易所中资上市公司的实证研究[J].管理评论, 2022,34(2):269-280.
[25] ALCHIAN A A,DEMSETZ H.Production, information costs, and economic organization[J].IEEE Engineering Management Review,1972,62(2):777-795.
[26] 韦庄禹.数字经济发展对制造业企业资源配置效率的影响研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2022,39(3):66-85.
[27] 申慧慧, 于鹏, 吴联生.国有股权、环境不确定性与投资效率[J].经济研究, 2012,47(7):113-126.
[28] 韩珣, 李建军.金融错配、非金融企业影子银行化与经济“脱实向虚”[J].金融研究, 2020,43(8):93-111.
[29] 陈红, 张玉, 刘东霞.政府补助、税收优惠与企业创新绩效——不同生命周期阶段的实证研究[J].南开管理评论, 2019,22(3):187-200.
文章导航

/