区域科学发展

数字技术创新赋能城市低碳转型路径机制研究

  • 陈晓 ,
  • 张鑫奥 ,
  • 王育宝
展开
  • (1.新疆大学 经济与管理学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046;2.新疆宏观经济高质量发展研究中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046;3.新疆能源碳中和战略与决策研究中心,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046)
陈晓(1970—),女,陕西临潼人,博士,新疆大学经济与管理学院教授、硕士生导师,新疆宏观经济高质量发展研究中心主任,研究方向为人口、资源与环境经济学;张鑫奥(1998—),男,河南许昌人,新疆大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生,新疆宏观经济高质量发展研究中心助理研究员,研究方向为西方经济学;王育宝(1968—),男,陕西乾县人,博士,新疆大学经济与管理学院副院长、博士生导师,新疆能源碳中和战略与决策研究中心主任,研究方向为气候变化经济学与“双碳”目标。本文通讯作者:张鑫奥。

收稿日期: 2023-07-27

  修回日期: 2023-11-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD133);中央引导地方科技发展专项-科技成果转移转化项目(ZYYD2022016);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2020D01C051);新疆大学哲学社会科学高端智库培育项目(22GPY003)

The Path and Mechanism of Digital Technology Innovation Empowering Urban Low-Carbon Transformation

  • Chen Xiao ,
  • Zhang Xinao ,
  • Wang Yubao
Expand
  • (1.College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China;2. Institute for Xinjiang Macro-Economic High-quality Development, Urumqi 830046,China;3.Xinjiang Energy Carbon Neutrality Strategy and Policy Research Center,Urumqi 830046, China)

Received date: 2023-07-27

  Revised date: 2023-11-14

  Online published: 2024-12-10

摘要

数字技术创新的强劲“东风”助力中国“双碳”目标实现是兼顾环境与发展、满足人民日益增长美好生活需要的重要途径。基于2006—2021年中国内地279个城市面板数据,运用297万件数字技术授权专利衡量中国地级市数字技术创新水平,从城市碳强度视角考察数字技术创新的影响。研究发现:①数字技术创新通过降低能源消耗强度和推动产业结构升级降低城市碳排放强度,国家智慧城市、国家知识产权城市和国家低碳城市试点政策有助于增强数字技术创新的减碳作用;②空间计量结果显示,数字技术创新通过城市间“虹吸效应”和“示范效应”产生空间协同降碳作用,整体上通过空间溢出对周边经济水平相近城市群产生碳强度削弱效应;③数字技术创新降碳程度因城市地理区位不同、能源禀赋差异存在异质性,不同类型数字核心产业创新及不同研究类型数字创新均能显著降低碳强度。因此,应把握数字技术创新机遇,构建低碳零碳负碳技术创新体系,因地制宜做好城市科技创新以支持碳达峰。

本文引用格式

陈晓 , 张鑫奥 , 王育宝 . 数字技术创新赋能城市低碳转型路径机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(23) : 41 -51 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.H202307142

Abstract

In order to cope with global climate change more effectively, it is a new mission to achieve low-carbon transformation for governments and businesses worldwide. Global environmental governance needs to make fresh contributions to building green and low-carbon production and lifestyles. Digital technology innovation, including artificial intelligence, big data analysis, and the Internet of Things, offers unprecedented opportunities for building a low-carbon economy. These innovations not only inject new vitality into traditional industries but also help reduce carbon emissions by improving energy efficiency and providing intelligent carbon management tools. Digital technology also gives rise to emerging industries, such as clean energy and intelligent transportation, which inherently have lower carbon footprints. Therefore, digital technology innovation is a key driver in promoting low-carbon transformation, reducing carbon emissions in traditional industries, and fostering new low-carbon economic growth. However, existing research lacks in-depth examination of the impact of technological innovation on carbon emissions, particularly in the field of digital technology innovation. Most studies tend to construct comprehensive indicators for the development of the digital economy to explore the relationship between digital economy development and carbon emissions.In-depth research on how digital technology innovation promotes low-carbon economic transformation is crucial for understanding its impact mechanisms and optimizing policy formulation.
In terms of research methodology, this paper analyzes the direct effects, indirect mechanisms, policy adjustments, and spatial spillover paths of digital technology innovation on low-carbon transformation. In order to examine the role of digital technology innovation in low-carbon transformation from the perspective of urban carbon intensity, the study selects the panel data from 279 Chinese cities from 2006 to 2021 to measure the level of digital technology innovation in Chinese cities with 2.97 million digital technology patents. Empirically, the main model for testing direct effects is the two-way fixed effects model; and then the mediation effect models and moderation effect models are used to analyze the indirect mechanisms and policy adjustments, respectively. The spatial carbon emission reduction effect of digital technology innovation is estimated using spatial Durbin and spatial lag models.
The study concludes that digital technology innovation reduces urban carbon emission intensity by lowering energy consumption intensity and promoting industrial and service sector upgrades through mediation effect channels within cities. External policies such as national smart cities, national intellectual property cities, and national low-carbon city pilots beef up the carbon reduction impact of digital technology innovation. Spatial econometric results show that digital technology innovation produces a synergistic carbon reduction effect through "siphoning" and "demonstration" effects among cities, overall reducing carbon intensity in surrounding economically similar urban agglomerations through spatial spillover. Moreover, the degree of carbon reduction through digital technology innovation varies depending on a city's geographical location and energy endowment, with different types of digital core industry innovations and different types of digital innovation research significantly reducing carbon intensity. Overall, this paper provides policy insights that the government should seize the opportunities of digital technology innovation, fully leverage the low-carbon transformation potential of digital technology, build a network of digital technology innovation spillovers, and appropriately support urban digital technology innovation for carbon peaking and neutrality.
This paper makes marginal contributions in three aspects. First, it explores the factors influencing urban carbon emission reduction from the perspective of digital technology innovation, verifying the direct impact of digital technology innovation on reducing carbon emission intensity and exploring its internal mediation mechanisms and external policy regulation mechanisms. Second, it measures digital technology innovation with patents authorized in the core industries of the digital economy and further uses spatial econometric models to examine the spatial spillover paths of digital technology innovation in reducing carbon emission intensity,which helps to explore the spatial paths of carbon reduction through digital technology innovation. Third, the paper also examines the heterogeneity in reducing carbon intensity through digital technology innovation among cities with different geographical locations and resource differences, as well as among various core industry innovations in the digital economy and different research on digital technology innovation.

参考文献

[1] BHARADWAJ A, EL SAWY O A, PAVLOU P A, et al. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights[J]. Mis Quarterly, 2013, 37(2): 471-482.
[2] ZAHID R M, LI Y, RAZAQUE L A, et al. The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the brics countries[J]. Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020, 27(19): 23899-23913.
[3] 谢云飞. 数字经济对区域碳排放强度的影响效应及作用机制[J]. 当代经济管理, 2022, 44(2): 68-78.
[4] 何艳秋, 成雪莹, 王芳. 技术扩散视角下农业碳排放区域溢出效应研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2022,43(4): 132-144.
[5] ZHAO M, SUN T, FENG Q. Capital allocation efficiency, technological innovation and vehicle carbon emissions: evidence from a panel threshold model of chinese new energy vehicles enterprises[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 784: 147104.
[6] 邵帅, 范美婷, 杨莉莉. 经济结构调整、绿色技术进步与中国低碳转型发展——基于总体技术前沿和空间溢出效应视角的经验考察[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(2): 46-69, 4-10.
[7] ZHANG W, LIU X, WANG D, et al. Digital economy and carbon emission performance: evidence at china's city level[J]. Energy Policy, 2022, 165: 112927.
[8] 陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J/OL]. 数量经济技术经济研究: 1-24. DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20230310.010.
[9] ZHU Z, LIU B, YU Z, et al. Effects of the digital economy on carbon emissions: evidence from china[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(15): 9450.
[10] AHMED F, NAEEM M, IQBAL M. ICT and renewable energy: a way forward to the next generation telecom base stations[J]. Telecommunication Systems, 2017, 64(1): 43-56.
[11] MURSHED M, TANHA M M. Oil price shocks and renewable energy transition: empirical evidence from net oil-importing south asian economies[J]. Energy Ecology and Environment, 2021, 6(3): 183-203.
[12] LIU Y, YANG Y, LI H, et al. Digital economy development, industrial structure upgrading and green total factor productivity: empirical evidence from China′s cities[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(4): 2414.
[13] 郭凯明, 杭静, 徐亚男. 劳动生产率、鲍莫尔病效应与区域结构转型[J]. 经济学动态, 2020,41(4): 79-95.
[14] 王雅晴, 谭德明, 张佳田, 等. 我国城市发展与能源碳排放关系的面板数据分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21): 7897-7907.
[15] 戴魁早, 黄姿, 王思曼. 数字经济促进了中国服务业结构升级吗[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(2): 90-112.
[16] 周勇, 吴海珍, 韩兆安. 数字经济对制造业转型升级的影响[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(20): 122-126.
[17] 王雅莉, 侯林岐, 朱金鹤. 城市创新能否助力低碳经济发展——创新型城市试点政策对碳强度的影响评估及机制分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(18): 39-49.
[18] 李湛, 张良, 罗鄂湘. 科技创新政策、创新能力与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(10): 14-24.
[19] 李爽, 王劲文. 低碳城市试点政策、居民低碳素养与企业绿色技术创新[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, 33(4): 93-103.
[20] LIU Y, DONG J, MEI L, et al. Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: an affordance perspective[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102458.
[21] 张峻, 刘小勇, 王昕芊. 国家知识产权试点政策是否促进了城市创新合作[J]. 经济学动态, 2023,64(5): 72-91.
[22] CHEN X, MAO S, LV S, et al. A study on the non-linear impact of digital technology innovation on carbon emissions in the transportation industry[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(19): 12432.
[23] 陈海龙, 李阳. 数字经济发展对创业活跃度的空间溢出效应研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2023, 38(5): 41-52.
[24] SU Y, LI Z, YANG C. Spatial interaction spillover effects between digital financial technology and urban ecological efficiency in china: an empirical study based on spatial simultaneous equations[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(16): 8535.
[25] 王赫, 吴朝阳. 经济差距对创新溢出与技术交流的影响——基于经济距离矩阵的空间计量研究[J]. 经济问题, 2020,40(9): 78-84.
[26] ARORA A, BELENZON S, SHEER L. Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research[J]. American Economic Review, 2021, 111(3): 871-898.
[27] SUN H, EDZIAH B K, KPORSU A K, et al. Energy efficiency: the role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 167: 120659.
[28] CHEN J, GAO M, CHENG S, et al. County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in china during 1997—2017[J]. Scientific Data, 2020, 7(1): 391.
[29] AKCIGIT U,HANLEY D,SERRANO-VELARDE N.Back to basics: basic research spillovers, innovation policy, and growth[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2021, 88(1): 1-43.
文章导航

/