高水平科技自立自强是在建设世界科技强国战略目标下提出的现阶段国家发展的重大战略,对于新时代应对国内外形势变化具有深刻意义。在新发展阶段,高水平研究型大学作为国家创新体系和战略科技力量的重要组成部分,在服务高水平科技自立自强战略目标中发挥着独特作用。基于20所“双一流”建设高校的调研和扎根分析,构建研究型大学服务高水平科技自立自强关键因素模型,提出研究型大学应通过体制机制改革,在高质量科学研究、拔尖创新人才培养、跨学科交叉融合、产学研深度融合、高水平国际科学合作、卓越创新文化建设6个方面发挥关键作用,履行其服务于高水平科技自立自强的历史使命。
Sci-tech self-reliance and self-strengthening(SRSS) at a higher level is critical for national development at the current stage, with the strategic goal of becoming a world scientific and technological power. The high-level research universities are part of the national innovation system and strategic scientific and technological force, playing a unique role in serving the strategic goal of sci-tech self-reliance and self-strengthening at higher levels.
In order to reveal the common characteristics and inherent laws of research universities in serving high-level SRSI, this study selects 20 "Double First-Class" universities for empirical research and ground theory analysis, and 6 main categories, 21 sub-categories and 52 influencing factors are then extracted. By exploring the potential correlation between the main categories, the study establishes the evidence chain of key factors based on the typical model of the typical model of the main category and builds the key factor model of high-level SRSS to present a comprehensive picture of the various factors that need to be considered and addressed to achieve the strategic goal.
It is concluded that the key factors for research universities to contribute to high-level SRSS include six aspects, but they are lagging behind the demand of the target of high-level SRSS. First of all, the innovative talents cultivation is far from the need of SRSS.Secondly, interdisciplinary integration still faces many difficulties. Due to disciplinary barriers and the uneven distribution of resources, interdisciplinary research is often difficult to carry out smoothly. Thirdly, the level and depth of the deep integration of industry, universities and research still need to be strengthened. Fourthly, most of the cooperation between universities and industry and research institutions remains at the surface level, with the need for deeper interaction and partnership to be established. Fifthly,international cooperation also needs to be continuously improved. Although the university has carried out some international cooperation and exchange activities, cooperation with world-class international universities and research institutions is still limited. Finally, a culture of innovation for excellence and embracing failure has not been established.This culture will encourage researchers to explore unknown areas, challenge traditional ideas, and not to fear failures and setbacks.
A series of recommendations for research universities are proposed. Firstly, in the innovation of the scientific research organization model, universities should increase the proportion of organized scientific research, and strengthen the top-level design, so as to build up an interdisciplinary and multi-team scientific research force, which is better to improve the efficiency of scientific research resource allocation, and carry out original leading scientific and technological breakthroughs which can enhance the source supply of innovation-driven research. Secondly, in terms of talent training, universities should constantly improve the training mode of innovative talents to provide the talents independently that meet the needs of SRSS, especially to cultivate a large number of top innovative talents. Thirdly, the discipline construction should conform to the profound reform of the scientific research paradigm; it requires the reform of innovation mechanism, environment supporting and encouraging scientific cooperation. Besides, disciplinary construction should conform to scientific laws and meet the needs of scientific research. Fourthly, the focus should shift from the technology transfer from university to industry to the deep cooperation of industry-university-research-application. Fifthly, research universities should be supported in international cooperation to lead big science or big instrument projects, participate more actively in the global scientific network, and enhance the universities′ original innovation capability and international influences. Finally, the innovation culture of pursuing excellence acts as a fundamental element that sustains high-level SRSS and ensures its continuous advancement. Behind the international competition in science and technology lies not just a contest of technology, equipment, and capital, but also a deeper rivalry between systems and cultures, where cultural factors exert a more profound and foundational influence. Given the high social standing and influence of research universities, it is imperative to reinforce their role in shaping innovative culture. This includes promoting the scientific spirit, fostering an environment conducive to innovation, and advocating for the enhancement of moral education, risk awareness, and ethical standards in science and technology in the culture of innovation.
[1] 眭依凡,富阳丽.科技自立自强:对“双一流”建设及其成效评价的系统性再思考[J]. 中国高教研究,2022,38(12):18-27.
[2] 沈红.研究型大学的自我迭代:新型研究型大学的诞生与发展[J].教育研究,2022,43(9):22-32.
[3] 习近平.加强基础研究 实现高水平科技自立自强[J].奋斗,2023,66(15):4-9.
[4] 阳镇,贺俊.科技自立自强:逻辑解构、关键议题与实现路径[J].改革,2023,36(3):15-31.
[5] 陈云,陈凯,谢科范,等. 打造高质量创新链[J]. 科技与管理,2022,24(5):1-10.
[6] 陈凯华,郭锐,裴瑞敏.我国科技人才政策十年发展与面向高水平科技自立自强的优化思路[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(5):613-621.
[7] 樊春良.面向科技自立自强的国家创新体系建设[J].当代中国与世界,2022,2(3):74-86.
[8] 闵维方.美国大学崛起的历史进程与管理特点分析[J].山东高等教育,2015,3(1):5-16,2.
[9] 秦铮,孙福全,袁立科.德美日建设世界科技强国的经验及启示[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(12):40-45.
[10] 方在庆.持续不间断地推进科研体制创新——德国成为世界科技强国之路[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(5):502-508.
[11] 贾永堂,徐娟.19世纪末20世纪初美国高水平研究型大学群体性崛起的机制分析——基于社会进化论的视角[J].高等教育研究,2012,33(5):79-89.
[12] National Science Board.The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020[EB/OL](2020-1-1)[2023-5-8].https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/.
[13] BERCOVITZ J, FELDMAN M.Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development[J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2006,31(1):175-188.
[14] 胡建华. “科学技术创造立国”政策下的日本大学改革[J].北京大学教育评论,2004,2(2):97-102.
[15] 郭伟,崔佳,赵明媚,等. 日本世界一流大学建设:变迁、特征与启示[J].中国高教研究,2020,36(9):91-97.
[16] 龚旭.构建经济强国的科技创新体制——日本科技体制改革的政策解析[J].中国科技论坛,2003,19(6):33-37.
[17] SALMI J.Excellence initiatives to create world-class universities[J]. Higher Education Evaluation and Development,2016,10(1):1-29.
[18] 沈红.研究型大学的自我迭代:新型研究型大学的诞生与发展[J]. 教育研究,2022,43(9):22-32.
[19] FREEMAN C.Technology policy and economic performance:lessons from Japan[M].London:Printer Publishers,1987:12-128.
[20] 教育部. 2021年教育统计数据[EB/OL][2022-12-30](2023-11-27), http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2021/quanguo/202301/t20230104_1038056.html.
[21] 教育部.第二轮“双一流”建设高校及建设学科名单[EB/OL].[2022-02-29](2022-10-14).http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/202202/t20220211_598710.html.
[22] 王战军.什么是研究型大学——中国研究型大学建设基本问题研究(一)[J].学位与研究生教育,2003,20(1):9-11.
[23] 徐高明.基于分类分层的一流大学差别化发展框架[J].现代教育管理,2019,39(2):25-31.
[24] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L. The discovery of ground theory:strategies for qualitative research[M]. Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company,1967.