案例研究

链主企业生态主导力提升产业链韧性路径研究——以比亚迪和中国新能源汽车产业链为例

  • 王进富 ,
  • 李婷婷 ,
  • 张颖颖
展开
  • (1.西安工程大学 管理学院,陕西 西安 710048;2.陕西省科技政策创新与评估软科学研究基地,陕西 西安 710048)
王进富(1978—),男,甘肃靖远人,博士,西安工程大学副校长,管理学院、陕西省科技政策创新与评估软科学研究基地教授,研究方向为科技体制机制改革与科技政策;李婷婷(1999—),女,山东菏泽人,西安工程大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为技术创新管理;张颖颖(1987—),女,陕西西安人,博士,西安工程大学管理学院、陕西省科技政策创新与评估软科学研究基地副教授,研究方向为科技创业与孵化。

收稿日期: 2023-05-20

  修回日期: 2023-10-31

  网络出版日期: 2024-11-11

基金资助

教育部人文社会科学青年项目(23YJC630242);陕西省社会科学基金年度项目(2023R008、2023R049);陕西省软科学研究一般项目(2023-CX-RKX-010);陕西省哲学社会科学研究专项青年项目(2023QN0127);陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目(21JK0179);西安市科协决策咨询研究项目(23JCZX002R2)

The Pathways of Ecological Dominance of Leading Firms in Industrial Chain to Enhance the Resilience of Industrial Chains:A Case Study of BYD and China's New Energy Vehicle Industry Chain

  • Wang Jinfu ,
  • Li Tingting ,
  • Zhang Yingying
Expand
  • (1.School of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an 710048, China;2.Shaanxi Science and Technology Policy Innovation and Evaluation Soft Science Research Base, Xi'an 710048, China)

Received date: 2023-05-20

  Revised date: 2023-10-31

  Online published: 2024-11-11

摘要

提升产业链供应链韧性和安全水平已成为新发展阶段推动我国高质量发展的关键着力点,具备生态主导力的链主企业在产业链韧性提升过程中扮演着支撑者、引领者和组织者的角色。以比亚迪和中国新能源汽车产业链为研究对象,采用扎根理论方法进行探索性单案例研究,探究链主企业生态主导力能力维度和产业链韧性提升路径。研究发现:①链主企业生态主导力包括技术创新引领能力、产业协作整合能力、数字转型赋能能力3个维度;②链主企业生态主导力通过促进产业链关键核心技术突破、产业链协同配套、产业链数字化转型3条路径提升产业链韧性,技术创新引领能力能够促进产业链关键核心技术突破,实现强链、补链,产业协作整合能力能够促进产业链协同配套,实现稳链、固链,数字转型赋能能力能够促进产业链数字化转型,实现延链、优链,从而显著提高产业链风险抵御能力、冲击恢复能力、链条升级能力。研究结论有助于拓展链主企业生态主导力与产业链韧性相关研究,为链主企业提升生态主导力和增强产业链韧性提供实践参考。

本文引用格式

王进富 , 李婷婷 , 张颖颖 . 链主企业生态主导力提升产业链韧性路径研究——以比亚迪和中国新能源汽车产业链为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024 , 41(21) : 151 -160 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.YXG202305164

Abstract

Enhancing the resilience and security levels of industrial and supply chains is critical for new developmental strategies. It also represents a crucial strategic choice for a nation's medium-to-long-term economic and social development. Moreover, it serves as an essential cornerstone in building a manufacturing powerhouse. A comprehensive, large-scale, and competitive industrial system has been fundamentally established in China, wherein the overall security and resilience of the industrial chains are being consistently fortified. However, the current global socio-political and economic landscape is fraught with complexities and uncertainties, exposing industrial chains to external risks such as disruptions and decouplings. Internally, these chains suffer from deficiencies like inadequate foundational innovative capabilities and a low position in the global value chain. Therefore, exploring avenues for augmenting industrial chain resilience is paramount for realizing the strategic objectives of high-quality development. Leading firms, acting as the 'architects' in constructing and evolving the entire industrial ecosystem, play a pivotal role in guiding industrial objectives and integrating relationships between upstream and downstream stakeholders. These firms can spearhead concerted efforts in critical cross-cutting technologies within the chain and facilitate the flow and sharing of innovative resources among entities within the chain. Hence, it is instrumental in enhancing industrial chain resilience by fully leveraging the ecological leadership of leading firms.
Existing literature has delved into the roles of leading firms and industrial chain resilience. However, it lacks a nuanced and differentiated analysis of the ecological leadership dimensions exerted by leading firms. Additionally, scant research has been conducted from a micro-enterprise perspective to examine the unique mechanisms through which leading firms, as dominant actors in the industrial ecosystem, contribute to enhancing industrial chain resilience. To bridge this gap, the present study employs grounded theory methodologies and conducts case studies comparing BYD and the Chinese new energy automotive industrial chain to investigate the capability dimensions of ecological leadership by leading firms and the processes by which they enhance industrial chain resilience.
The findings reveal that (1) in their development, leading firms progressively establish ecological leadership capabilities that enhance the resilience of industrial chains. These capabilities are categorized into three dimensions: technological innovation leadership, industrial collaboration and integration, and digital transformation empowerment. Specifically, technological innovation leadership is manifested through capabilities in technological innovation and leading innovation. Industrial collaboration and integration are demonstrated through resource integration and relationship coordination capabilities. Digital transformation empowerment is embodied in digital concept empowerment, digital resource empowerment, and digital structure empowerment. (2) The ecological leadership exerted by leading firms enhances the resilience of industrial chains through three distinct pathways: breakthroughs in key technologies, coordinated industrial linkages, and digital transformation of the industrial chain. Firstly, relying on their capabilities in technological innovation, the leading firms disseminate technology, knowledge, and information to firms within the chain. Then, through autonomous innovation and open, collaborative innovation with intra-chain firms, significant advancements in key technologies are achieved, thereby filling the gaps in weak technological links and considerably bolstering the resilience of critical elements within the industrial chain. Secondly, on the basis of their capabilities in industrial collaboration and integration, leading firms collaborate with large, medium, and small enterprises, as well as upstream and downstream entities, facilitating the development of a stable system for coordinated industrial linkages. This enables prompt adjustments to be made, thereby maintaining stability when disruptions impact the industrial chain. Thirdly, anchored by their capabilities in digital transformation empowerment, leading firms realize comprehensive digital transformation in R&D, production, and product intelligence, markedly enhancing product quality, user experience and competitive advantage. Concurrently, this drives the acceleration of digital transformation among smaller firms within the chain, thereby promoting an ascendancy in the value of the industrial chain and augmenting its efficiency and resilience.
This study, while clarifying the specific dimensions encompassed by the ecological leadership of lead firms, also provides an in-depth and expanded analysis of the essence, manifestation, and functionality of each dimension. From a micro-enterprise perspective, the study unveils specific pathways for augmenting the resilience of industrial chains, enriching the viewpoints in existing resilience studies, and extending the scope of research on the resilience of individual industrial chains to the new energy automotive industrial chain.

参考文献

[1] 盛朝迅.着力提升产业链供应链韧性和安全水平[J].中国经济评论,2022,43(11):36-39.
[2] 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.
[3] 吕越,邓利静.着力提升产业链供应链韧性与安全水平——以中国汽车产业链为例的测度及分析[J].国际贸易问题,2023,49(2):1-19.
[4] 段浩.新冠疫情对我国产业链韧性的压力测试及应对举措[J].中国工业和信息化,2020,6(3):94-96.
[5] JACOBIDES M G, MACDUFFIE J P, TAE C J. Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMS: change and stability in the automotive sector[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(9):1942-1967.
[6] 陈套.企业成为创新主体的逻辑发凡和实践路径[J].科学管理研究,2022,40(2):88-95.
[7] 赵晶,刘玉洁,付珂语,等.大型国企发挥产业链链长职能的路径与机制——基于特高压输电工程的案例研究[J].管理世界,2022,38(5):221-240.
[8] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组.产业链链长的理论内涵及其功能实现[J].中国工业经济,2022,40(7):7-26.
[9] 陈英武,俞晓峰.产业链“链主”企业生态主导力提升路径研究——以江苏为例[J].经济研究参考,2022,44(11):59-68.
[10] 吕越,张杰.人工智能与产业链韧性提升[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2024,44(2):29-38.
[11] 张正荣,刘丹,邬关荣.数字经济对制造业产业链韧性的空间溢出效应[J].浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,50(5):531-538.
[12] 李胜会,戎芳毅.知识产权治理如何提升产业链韧性——基于国家知识产权示范城市政策的实证检验[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,44(5): 92-107.
[13] 吴金明,邵昶.产业链形成机制研究——“4+4+4”模型[J].中国工业经济,2006,24(4):36-43.
[14] 刘志彪,孔令池.双循环格局下的链长制:地方主导型产业政策的新形态和功能探索[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,71(1):110-118.
[15] 林淑君,倪红福.中国式产业链链长制:理论内涵与实践意义[J].云南社会科学,2022,42(4):90-101.
[16] 白雪洁,宋培,艾阳,等.中国构建自主可控现代产业体系的理论逻辑与实践路径[J].经济学家,2022,34(6):48-57.
[17] 盛朝迅.产业生态主导企业培育的国际经验与中国路径[J].改革,2022,45(10):34-44.
[18] ROSE A. Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2007, 7(4): 383-398.
[19] 陈晓东,刘洋,周柯.数字经济提升我国产业链韧性的路径研究[J].经济体制改革,2022,40(1):95-102.
[20] 石建勋,卢丹宁.着力提升产业链供应链韧性和安全水平研究[J].财经问题研究,2023,43(2):3-13.
[21] 肖兴志,李少林.大变局下的产业链韧性:生成逻辑、实践关切与政策取向[J].改革,2022,45(11):1-14.
[22] 李胜会,戎芳毅.产业链现代化的渐进逻辑:破解锁定与韧性提升[J].广东社会科学,2022,39(5):37-47.
[23] 罗良文,马艳芹.“双碳”目标下产业链韧性提升的机理、挑战及路径[J].现代经济探讨,2023,42(6):85-96.
[24] 王泽宇,唐云清,韩增林,等.中国沿海省份海洋船舶产业链韧性测度及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2022,42(7):117-125.
[25] 张伟,李航宇,张婷.中国制造业产业链韧性测度及其时空分异特征[J].经济地理,2023,43(4):134-143.
[26] 李伟,贺俊.基于能力视角的产业链安全内涵、关键维度和治理战略[J].云南社会科学,2022,42(4):102-110.
[27] EISENHARDT K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 532-550.
[28] 贾旭东,谭新辉.经典扎根理论及其精神对中国管理研究的现实价值[J].管理学报,2010,7(5):656-665.
[29] 胡登峰,冯楠,黄紫微,等.新能源汽车产业创新生态系统演进及企业竞争优势构建——以江淮和比亚迪汽车为例[J].中国软科学,2021,36(11):150-160.
[30] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research[M].London:Routledge, 2017.
[31] 阳镇.关键核心技术:多层次理解及其突破[J].创新科技,2023,23(1):14-24.
[32] 单宇,刘爽,马宝龙.国产替代过程中关键核心技术的适应性重构机制——基于海信集团1969—2022视像技术的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2023,39(4):80-100.
[33] 顾润德,李春发,孙雷霆,等.全产业链模式下制造业产业生态链构建机制研究——基于扎根理论的多案例探索[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(14):40-50.
[34] 肖旭,戚聿东.产业数字化转型的价值维度与理论逻辑[J].改革,2019,42(8):61-70.
[35] 张卿,邓石军.数字化转型对企业韧性的影响——来自COVID-19的证据[J].经济与管理,2023,37(1):38-48.
[36] 徐铮,张其仔,孙琴.不同投入来源制造业数字化对全球价值链分工地位的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(9):44-54.
文章导航

/